AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Dude tips a ton and threatens to have model banned

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.

eagerbeaver

Banhammered
Jun 30, 2021
42
22
21
So I'm in this room right now and the model is relatively new. She's been on the site for a few months. She has this one member who sends her tip notes and joined her fanclub so he can pm her all the time. He's always telling her to go home or else... It was never clear what the else was until today. So he's in her room and he just has a real shitty attitude with everyone. And then another dude tipped her like 500. And so the creepy stalker fan immediately tips her 1000. Then someone else tips 1000. And this just loses his mind. He tips like 4000 and then a few minutes later tips a steady stream of 1000 each time. She's up to like almost 20k at this point. Which is great sure. Except the entire time he's telling her that if she doesn't do what he says, he'll get her room banned. Now I personally think he's full of shit but I do know I've seen rooms get banned out of the blue before. She's not from the U.S. and her english isn't very good so she's having a real difficult time figuring out what to do. She's scared that he'll actually get her room banned if she doesn't play along with his craziness. She's showed me things he said and it's really creepy possessive shit. "Now do u really wanna upset me?" is a direct quote.

So my questions are:
1. Is he most likely full of shit or is there a chance he could get her banned?
2. Depending on the answer to question 1, what's the best thing for her to when dealing with this guy?
3. What's the best thing someone like me can do in this situation? I don't want to make things worse.

I wrote all of this really fast because this happening right now so if anything is unclear just ask.
Thanks in advance.
 
The ‘looking too young thing’ is the biggest threat to Chaturbate’s existence given the idiotic role playing games being played. I had a favourite cam girl and while I knew she played the ‘daddy’ game, it was written on her clothing, I had no idea what she was doing in other peoples private shows until I made the mistake of spying on one. SHe was deadset imitating a pre-pubescent child for a paedophile. It horrified me to see her like that. I spoke with her about it on instagram and she refused to stop simulating child sex shows. She said everyone pays for their own shows and most of the people in her room were paedophiles. It became apparent that was what she was actually seeking out. Now the studio is apparently banned, . THere is a huge network of paedophiles using Chaturbate right now for these illegal simulated child sex shows and some girls are falling for the trap of taking the quick money only to lose their career at Chaturbate when reported. In some jurisdictions they might even be charged with a criminal offence. It’s not worth it. Chaturbate has a log of everything said on the site and keeps the video evidence. This studio was so blatant in presenting these underage simulation shows that I cringe at the thought of what else they get up to. They just created a huge paedophile ring on her account, 24,000 paying clients, many of whom they can now have offline conversations with and they know their illegal kinks.

You all saw what just happened with Pornhub etc, with the payment processors such as Visa threatening to stop processing payments to their sites unless they removed a lot of content? Chaturbate will likely be forced to delete a lot more accounts of young looking and acting people because of this blatant, persistent paedophile ring operating on CHaturbate and the foolish few girls who service them. I found a twitter account for this particular girl and it even advertises her as underage with an 18 in a circle with a cross through it. Just that by itself would likely cause Visa to consider action. If it was me making the decisions at CHaturbate then right now I would instruct all young people to remove teddy bears from their sets, grow pubic hair, not to wear pigtails and immediately report anyone who asks them to call them daddy, or uncle, or to act less than their age. Then I’d send people in to test if they are complying and immediately ban those who don’t take this issue seriously. That is going to have to happen, the only question is will it be because Visa or law enforcement takes action or if CHaturbate can head it off by themselves first. Why would anyone act and dress up like a small child unless they want to attract a paedophile? Keep that crap off our screens.
If true, of course this is very serious and I'm sure with the appropriate evidence, would be followed up by the site passing on details to law enforcement agencies.

But there is no comparison between deliberate and illegal behaviour, and banning an age-verified broadcaster based on a subjective 'appearance' of age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yummybrownfox
Upvote 0
If true, of course this is very serious and I'm sure with the appropriate evidence, would be followed up by the site passing on details to law enforcement agencies.

But there is no comparison between deliberate and illegal behaviour, and banning an age-verified broadcaster based on a subjective 'appearance' of age.
You know what Rod, I do agree with you. In fact I have seen and lamented the fact when a couple of my favourite broadcasters miss fairy and laura_lee were banned for this and they were in their 20’s, at least I know Laura was 23. Since I have seen what is really going on with these young girls with teddy bears, pigtails and uniforms with ‘yes daddy’ written on them however, I can see large scale action needs to be taken if CHaturbate is to have a future and licence to operate. It’s likely the world’s largest ever peadophile network developing in plain sight
 
  • Like
Reactions: yummybrownfox
Upvote 0
I've never sought out the rooms that focus on the 'daddy' hashtag, so I can't comment. But I'm not convinced that the situation is as dramatic as you suggest ^.

I'd also think it better to not mention broadcasters by name here.
Those two broadcasters I named were only banned because of their appearance, as you mentioned in your comment. In no way did I mean to infer they were involved in the illegal practices I described in my earlier comment. I have not named the girl who I recently reported to CHaturbate with dates and times for conducting the criminal offence.
 
Upvote 0
I found a twitter account for this particular girl and it even advertises her as underage with an 18 in a circle with a cross through it.

Not sure about the model you’re referencing here, but the 18/crossed out emoji is commonly used to indicate the content is NSFW and/or for people 18+ only. I see it in a lot of model profiles and that’s usually what they mean, not that they themselves are under 18. But I see how it could be confusing.
 
Upvote 0
In no way did I mean to infer they were involved in the illegal practices I described in my earlier comment. I have not named the girl who I recently reported to CHaturbate with dates and times for conducting the criminal offence.
Yeah that wasn't what I meant, just a general comment that it's better to not mention specific models here (unless it's the model themself seeking account help in one of the support areas).
 
  • Like
Reactions: yummybrownfox
Upvote 0
In some jurisdictions they might even be charged with a criminal offence.
In Germany a chat that describes sex with a child would be child porn, and it's illegal to own it or share it with others. The German law does summarize all porn under the term “pornographic writings”, which includes text and photos and videos. It's about the topic, not about the medium.
 
Upvote 0
In Germany a chat that describes sex with a child would be child porn, and it's illegal to own it or share it with others. The German law does summarize all porn under the term “pornographic writings”, which includes text and photos and videos. It's about the topic, not about the medium.
Yes, I’m in Australia and what I saw could potentially have resulted in me being charged for viewing child pornography. I left the room as soon as I saw what was happening and did not know it was going to happen, but I saw some of it so technically am I guilty of the offence? Chaturbate broadcast it, are they guilty of an offence too? It is such a ridiculously stupid and dangerous thing for people to do.
 
Upvote 0
The ‘looking too young thing’ is the biggest threat to Chaturbate’s existence given the idiotic role playing games being played. I had a favourite cam girl and while I knew she played the ‘daddy’ game, it was written on her clothing, I had no idea what she was doing in other peoples private shows until I made the mistake of spying on one. SHe was deadset imitating a pre-pubescent child for a paedophile. It horrified me to see her like that. I spoke with her about it on instagram and she refused to stop simulating child sex shows. She said everyone pays for their own shows and most of the people in her room were paedophiles. It became apparent that was what she was actually seeking out. Now the studio is apparently banned, . THere is a huge network of paedophiles using Chaturbate right now for these illegal simulated child sex shows and some girls are falling for the trap of taking the quick money only to lose their career at Chaturbate when reported. In some jurisdictions they might even be charged with a criminal offence. It’s not worth it. Chaturbate has a log of everything said on the site and keeps the video evidence. This studio was so blatant in presenting these underage simulation shows that I cringe at the thought of what else they get up to. They just created a huge paedophile ring on her account, 24,000 paying clients, many of whom they can now have offline conversations with and they know their illegal kinks.

As Shakespeare might say, "The gentleman doth protest too much me thinks."

I have spied on at least 200 private shows on CB, and I have not seen any behavior that is even remotely like what you describe in any one of those 200+ shows. How is it that you find one of these shows and then somehow imply that 24000 followers on this person's account are all pedophiles? Not to be stopped after wrongly accusing 23,999 followers without evidence, you then go on to trash the entire CB website.

The only thing that is clear from your post is that you spend a lot of time thinking about this issue, and you approach morality the way someone from the "moral majority" would, which is to take a few isolated pieces of evidence and immediately use them to imply bad things about entire populations of totally innocent people. You would be perfect as a judge at the Salem Witch Trials. You would be sure to find 150 witches in every neighborhood of 100 people.

I do agree with some of the things you discuss. I think CB should just ban things like Teddy Bears in rooms. It doesn't serve any purpose except to make someone look younger than they are. I might even go as far as removing the #daddy tag. It has too much ambiguity and people like you will never give anyone the benefit of the doubt and will always read its use as evidence for whatever you want to see. Maybe if CB did some obvious things and removed this low-hanging fruit they could stop banning 24 year olds for "looking too young".
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
They just created a huge paedophile ring on her account, 24,000 paying clients, many of whom they can now have offline conversations with and they know their illegal kinks.
This is quite a bold statement.

First, you state 24K paedophlies are somehow connected to her account. Well, maybe you spent the last decade spying on 24K private shows, thereby making sure her business really works well.

Then you state they build a ring, which means they communicate among each other, not just with the performer. How did you get to that conclusion?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.