Account Terminate on stripchat

[hellobelleme]

Hi everyone, I’m posting here because I genuinely need help and clarity regarding my permanent ban on Stripchat.
Over a month ago, I was banned with no warning, no prior violations, and no suspension, just an immediate permanent ban. I’ve had time to process it, but I still cannot understand how this decision was justified.
The situation that led to the ban was very straightforward. A subscriber had just joined my fan club and asked for my WhatsApp. I refused and told him that if he wanted further interaction, he could tip 100 tokens on the platform. I do not accept off-site payments, and I never shared personal contact information. I only work within the token system.
After that, he became upset and reported me.
That is the full story.
I did not break any rules. I did not receive a warning. Yet I was permanently banned, while similar behavior by other models seems to go unpunished. This makes the enforcement feel inconsistent and unfair.
What’s especially frustrating is that models are the ones bringing and keeping customers on the platform. I had a loyal fan base, and many of my viewers regularly recharged tokens just to be part of my fan club. Even now, after moving on, people continue to message me asking when I’ll be back on Stripchat.
So my question, especially for Armin or anyone with insight, is this:
Why permanently ban a contributing, rule-abiding model without warning or a clear explanation?
I truly believe Stripchat needs to review how these cases are handled. Permanent bans should not be the first response when no rules were clearly violated.
If anyone has advice, contacts, or has experienced something similar, I would really appreciate your input.

 

[Elira_SC]

Hi there. What is the specific reason given for the ban? It would have said in your email.

 

[hellobelleme]

The email says the reason was “accepting payments other than tokens.” That is not true. I have never accepted off-site payments of any kind.
I had a normal public show the night before and woke up to my account terminated. The only incident was a subscriber asking for my WhatsApp, which I refused. I told him to tip on the platform instead. He got upset and reported me.
There was no warning, no investigation, and no proof. My appeals have only received automated responses. That’s why I’m asking for help here.

 

[Elira_SC]

The account was reviewed internally through the appropriate processes, and the decision falls under a category of violations that are not eligible for appeal. That determination was made based on information verified during the review, not on public statements or assumptions. As a reminder, Stripchat is a tokens-only platform and you did break this rule.

That said, Community Managers are here as a resource. If models or users ever have questions about what’s allowed, or are unsure whether something may cross a line, reaching out early and being transparent gives us the best opportunity to provide guidance before issues escalate.

 

[Elira_SC]

I want to clarify one important point at a high level due to a few comments.


Enforcement actions are not taken based on attempts or “baiting” alone. In situations where users try to push boundaries and the model clearly refuses and reports it, that is not grounds for punishment.

In this specific case, the review was based on verified information showing that the interaction went beyond a refusal and crossed into activity that isn’t permitted on a tokens-only platform. Because of privacy and security policies, we can’t discuss details publicly, but the decision was made based on what was confirmed during review- not assumptions or third-party reports.

We understand these topics are emotional, and we take model safety seriously. That’s exactly why we encourage models to reach out to Community Managers or Support as soon as something feels questionable, so we can help before it escalates into an enforcement issue.

 

[Vixxen81]

not on public statements or assumptions.

It was literally a USER report you used to ban her. What the actual fuck? You say so in your own reply.

 

[Vixxen81]

the interaction went beyond a refusal and crossed into activity

How?

"I won't do that"

REPORT REPORT REPORT

Model banned


I mean I really think you don't understand how bad your reputation on this site is for being so UNFRIENDLY to models at every turn. If you ban them all, where you gonna earn your salary? You think models are just clamoring to sign up for SC when there are ten other sites above you?

 

[Elira_SC]

It was literally a USER report you used to ban her. What the actual fuck? You say so in your own reply.

No — that’s not correct. What I said is that the determination was made based on information verified during the review, not on public statements or assumptions. In other words, the situation was investigated by the moderation team.

Permanent bans are not issued simply because an account is reported. Enforcement decisions are made only after an investigation is completed.

 

[Vixxen81]

No — that’s not correct. What I said is that the determination was made based on information verified during the review, not on public statements or assumptions. In other words, the situation was investigated by the moderation team.

Permanent bans are not issued simply because an account is reported. Enforcement decisions are made only after an investigation is completed.

I do not believe that a model went to ask for offline tips when you guys have such a butt plug up your ass about not sharing anything that isn't SC. I would really love for you to be more transparent because it seems like you'd rather ban the model than the user. It's stupid and I don't really see why you offer so little support to models but drool over tippers who report models for really stupid shit.

You're always "oh let me look into it, yeah I did and you suck so ban"

Chaturbate overturns bans all of the time and you're not even subjected to the US laws that CB is. You just make it up on the fly. In Greece. IDK, shady stuff.

 

[Elira_SC]

How?

"I won't do that"

REPORT REPORT REPORT

Model banned


I mean I really think you don't understand how bad your reputation on this site is for being so UNFRIENDLY to models at every turn. If you ban them all, where you gonna earn your salary? You think models are just clamoring to sign up for SC when there are ten other sites above you?

Reports alone do not result in bans. Reports trigger a review, and any enforcement decision is made only after moderation investigates the situation and verifies what occurred. This applies to users and models alike.

We’re not able to explain the specifics of how a boundary was crossed in a public forum, especially to third parties who are not the account holder. You are not the account holder. Those conversations happen privately and directly with the person involved — and in this case, that’s already taking place. If they feel comfortable sharing HOW, it's a personal decision.

If you have feedback or concerns about how reports are handled in general, you’re welcome to share them with Support or reach out to me privately. Public speculation about individual cases isn’t helpful and often misses important context. All the best!

 

[Vixxen81]

Reports alone do not result in bans. Reports trigger a review, and any enforcement decision is made only after moderation investigates the situation and verifies what occurred. This applies to users and models alike.

We’re not able to explain the specifics of how a boundary was crossed in a public forum, especially to third parties who are not the account holder. You are not the account holder. Those conversations happen privately and directly with the person involved — and in this case, that’s already taking place. If they feel comfortable sharing HOW, it's a personal decision.

If you have feedback or concerns about how reports are handled in general, you’re welcome to share them with Support or reach out to me privately. Public speculation about individual cases isn’t helpful and often misses important context. All the best!

You did not explain HOW to the person in question because they are STILL confused on HOW you reached the conclusion they solicited offline payments. If you had explained it, they wouldn't be here asking for an explanation.

 

[Elira_SC]

You did not explain HOW to the person in question because they are STILL confused on HOW you reached the conclusion they solicited offline payments. If you had explained it, they wouldn't be here asking for an explanation.

I'm not sure where you are getting this information from as I have not heard from the original poster. I have heard from them once and that was the screenshot in this thread. Everything else has been you and myself. I clarified with them via PM why the conclusion was made and how. Simple. They will respond when they can.

 

[Vixxen81]

I'm not sure where you are getting this information from as I have not heard from the original poster. I have heard from them once and that was the screenshot in this thread. Everything else has been you and myself. I clarified with them via PM why the conclusion was made and how. Simple. They will respond when they can.

The email says the reason was “accepting payments other than tokens.” That is not true. I have never accepted off-site payments of any kind.
I had a normal public show the night before and woke up to my account terminated. The only incident was a subscriber asking for my WhatsApp, which I refused. I told him to tip on the platform instead. He got upset and reported me.
There was no warning, no investigation, and no proof. My appeals have only received automated responses. That’s why I’m asking for help here.

 

[Meowverlord]

Just wanting to add a thing here: I get several users each month that propose, upfront, off site payments to which I obviously say a clear "no". Like they're not even bothering to censorship it anymore or say it in a more subtle manner. These users also get reported. However, funnily enough, the report review always comes back as negative. No violation there. Nothing. Nada.

Make it make sense, maybe? I maybe have time to double down and dispute -some- of them, but I'm pretty sure no one has the time to dispute ALL the reports they sent because the review system saw nothing wrong with what we reported.

No offense but if the same algorithm that reviews reports is the same algorithm that bans/suspends models.... And I worked in CS before, and I know the usual reply will be something among the lines of "all reports are carefully reviewed by our dedicated team" but.... no, they're really not.

Edit: Do we just build a folder of screenshots now of what each member did/say because one of the site's, relatively vital function, works every now and then? Hopefully not.

 

[Vixxen81]

Just wanting to add a thing here: I get several users each month that propose, upfront, off site payments to which I obviously say a clear "no". Like they're not even bothering to censorship it anymore or say it in a more subtle manner. These users also get reported. However, funnily enough, the report review always comes back as negative. No violation there. Nothing. Nada.

Make it make sense, maybe? I maybe have time to double down and dispute -some- of them, but I'm pretty sure no one has the time to dispute ALL the reports they sent because the review system saw nothing wrong with what we reported.

No offense but if the same algorithm that reviews reports is the same algorithm that bans/suspends models.... And I worked in CS before, and I know the usual reply will be something among the lines of "all reports are carefully reviewed by our dedicated team" but.... no, they're really not.

 

[BlueEyezIrish]

Just wanting to add a thing here: I get several users each month that propose, upfront, off site payments to which I obviously say a clear "no". Like they're not even bothering to censorship it anymore or say it in a more subtle manner. These users also get reported. However, funnily enough, the report review always comes back as negative. No violation there. Nothing. Nada.

Make it make sense, maybe? I maybe have time to double down and dispute -some- of them, but I'm pretty sure no one has the time to dispute ALL the reports they sent because the review system saw nothing wrong with what we reported.

No offense but if the same algorithm that reviews reports is the same algorithm that bans/suspends models.... And I worked in CS before, and I know the usual reply will be something among the lines of "all reports are carefully reviewed by our dedicated team" but.... no, they're really not.

Edit: Do we just build a folder of screenshots now of what each member did/say because one of the site's, relatively vital function, works every now and then? Hopefully not.

I just ban now and stopped reporting the second they beg for incest, RacePlay, pay off site. They gone.

 

[AmberCutie]

I clarified with them via PM why the conclusion was made and how. Simple. They will respond when they can.

It's up to @hellobelleme if they'd like to post here what was said in PM about "why" the ban is justified and not being lifted.

But it's also up to cam sites if they don't want to respond/give specifics after a ban (we've seen it happen with CB threads, too.)

So let's just leave this be until @hellobelleme responds or we'll just let this thread die off.