@purpur_nya You're not helping your case by continuing to make defamatory statements. TL;DR: you believed misinformation and acted on it in a way that violated CB's terms, and CB responded to my complaint by banning your account.
But since I've had coffee, let's address your points:
Let's assume you're referring to notices like this:
View attachment 103937
First, it's not "all the rooms", just ones where some of my open-source apps run. The fact that you might be seeing them a lot of rooms is more a statement that many models have found my apps useful.
Second, broadcasters are informed about this behaviour at the very top of the documentation for each of these apps as a way to provide transparency:
View attachment 103938
Third, the apps that send these notices used to send them out every time a user entered a room where they were running, but in response to feedback from both models and viewers I changed that so that the notices are only sent once every 10 minutes, at most, when a user enters a room.
I think it's important to note that many apps advertise themselves, but most do it in subtler and more subliminal ways. I chose to be a little louder about it but to also be transparent about it.
The obvious criticism is that this is intended to be a bait and switch, i.e., go to my bio to read about app safety but instead be presented about paid options for apps. The information about custom, personal, and subscription apps is there, yes, but I've done my best to front load the information on app safety and push the rest to the bottom. The vast majority of commissions I've received for apps have come from word of mouth or because a model saw an app running in another model's room, so if I'm using this as a way to advertise my services as a paid-app developer then I'm deliberately failing.
"jumping in all the rooms" doesn't mean anything.
"threatening all the models" - You would do well to either substantiate or retract this as it is blatantly defamatory. I have not threatened any models, and even my tip message to you was to make sure you understood that you were repeating misinformation and that your action was observed by someone who reported it to me, i.e., that CB is not so anonymous that one can act with impunity.
Giving myself access to commands as being something malicious is an accusation that was made by someone called Pigley, so I'll repeat the same response I made previously and even provide more detail. There are 3 open-source apps where I give myself privileges beyond what a regular viewer has --
Ad Blocker,
Ad Blocker Lite, and
/dev/null -- and these are fully acknowledged and described in the documentation for each app:
Ad Blocker:
View attachment 103939
Ad Blocker Lite:
View attachment 103940
/dev/null:
View attachment 103941
Debug mode for all 3 apps allows messages that are hidden by the apps to be seen by whoever has that mode turned on. There are no privacy concerns here because the messages were intended to be seen publicly by the person sending them.
Information that is stored and can be retrieved by me can also be retrieved in the same way by the broadcaster:
View attachment 103942
The information being stored in Ad Blocker and Ad Blocker Lite is all related to blocked messages. Messages that are blocked as bad phrases are stored. This is used as a way to check that only messages that are intended to be blocked are being blocked and to be able to identify any false positives and adjust the pattern matching accordingly. Domains of sites that are advertising themselves -- usually as "better than Chaturbate" -- are also stored and dynamically integrated into a pattern so that they can be used to block future messages. The dynamically-built pattern and the messages where domains were detected are stored and retrievable as well for quality assurance checks.
If you wish to challenge this, then please provide technical detail and more than just vague assertions like "reserving himself commands execution".
Do I think that Ad Blocker and Ad Blocker Lite are over-engineered and could likely do without some of this? Yes. But everything it's doing is related to blocked-message management and doesn't retain or provide access to any information that wasn't intended to be public.
The attacks on Ad Blocker by Pigley are sour grapes because it caught him using backdoors in one of his apps in a model's room. Nothing more.
The ability to run at all times and persist data over time are key strengths of V2 apps. I've already addressed the misinformation about Ad Blocker and Ad Blocker Lite.
I'm not really sure what "going against him" means. You're the first model I've reported to do with anything related to apps, and I would have reported you regardless of whether you were a model or not based on your action. The onus is on you to act within the terms that CB lays out and you chose to violate those terms.
I assume this refers to information in my CB bio. CB is well aware of the contents of my bio and has not, to date, asked me to remove any part of it. Each of the developers listed there has been caught using backdoors or blacklists or specific manipulations and it certainly does not include "all the other developers that had ideas and developed cool apps". There are some great developers contributing to the CB ecosystem, and there are some whom I have beefs with but I won't list them there because the issues don't have anything to do with app safety. I think I've proven even on this forum that I'm careful not to name anyone unless I'm 100% certain of the claim I'm making, so anyone on that list should be there as a public service warning to models and users alike.
CB has confirmed that developers can receive payment for apps:
View attachment 103936
