New platform developers looking for UI / UX creator feedback

[GoonGold]

Hi everyone,

I hope this type of post is okay here in this topic.
(Please feel free to remove this post if it violates any topic rules.)

We’re a team of developers (not models ourselves) building an independent platform (alternative to blue site) designed specifically with models and content creators in mind.

Right now, we’re in an active beta phase and are looking for creators who are open to testing the platform and providing feedback to help us refine and improve it.

A few details:

• Fully functional platform
• Subscriptions, PPV, Tips, Livestreaming
• Payouts are active and being issued
• Beta creators receive 90% revenue share
• Optional referral/affiliate program (earn 5% commission on referred creator's payouts)

If you are interested in being part of the beta and helping shape the platform, we would be very happy and excited to work with you.

You can check us out here:
https://goongold.com or https://goon.gold

Happy to answer any questions. Feel free to reply or message me directly.

Thanks for your time
GoonGold Team

 

[KingMarti]

What is blue site? (this could literally be like a dozen sites, so if you are going to use another site to compare yourself against... say the name so people know what you are on about)

What is your USP?
How does using your site benefit me over using another more established site (payout % isnt a benefit btw if your payout in $ isnt more than what a site at a lower % is earning me)

 

[AmberCutie]

What is blue site?

I wondered the same.

 

[Maxi]

Odd way of saying OF…

 

[GoonGold]

What is blue site? (this could literally be like a dozen sites, so if you are going to use another site to compare yourself against... say the name so people know what you are on about)

What is your USP?
How does using your site benefit me over using another more established site (payout % isnt a benefit btw if your payout in $ isnt more than what a site at a lower % is earning me)

Haha fair point. By “blue site” I was referring to OnlyFans, but honestly most of them are blue, and they're all competition didn’t mean to be vague there.

As for your questions, totally valid.

USP:
We’re building this as a creator-first platform from the ground up, not just another clone. That means direct communication with us as developers, so feedback actually turns into changes. We’re iterating quickly and building alongside creators, not years behind them. There’s also more flexibility in how creators run their business, including pricing, content, and tools. We are also not controlled by deep or dark money, nor ever will be.

Why use us over established sites:
You’re absolutely right that percentage alone doesn’t matter if total earnings aren’t higher.

Where we aim to differentiate is in opportunity and performance. Being early means less saturation and better discoverability. We’re focusing heavily on conversion and spend behavior, so features like PPV and upsells are designed to increase actual revenue. There’s also much closer support and influence, so beta creators can directly shape features that impact their own income. On top of that, we offer additional earning potential through referrals and upcoming monetization features.

So the goal isn’t just a higher percentage, it’s higher overall earnings.

We’re still early, so this is best suited for creators who want to get in early, help shape the platform, and grow with it.

Happy to answer anything else

 

[KingMarti]

Haha fair point. By “blue site” I was referring to OnlyFans, but honestly most of them are blue, and they're all competition didn’t mean to be vague there.

As for your questions, totally valid.

USP:
We’re building this as a creator-first platform from the ground up, not just another clone. That means direct communication with us as developers, so feedback actually turns into changes. We’re iterating quickly and building alongside creators, not years behind them. There’s also more flexibility in how creators run their business, including pricing, content, and tools. We are also not controlled by deep or dark money, nor ever will be.

this is what every site has said, it's not really a usp

Why use us over established sites:
You’re absolutely right that percentage alone doesn’t matter if total earnings aren’t higher.

Where we aim to differentiate is in opportunity and performance. Being early means less saturation and better discoverability. We’re focusing heavily on conversion and spend behavior, so features like PPV and upsells are designed to increase actual revenue. There’s also much closer support and influence, so beta creators can directly shape features that impact their own income. On top of that, we offer additional earning potential through referrals and upcoming monetization features.

So the goal isn’t just a higher percentage, it’s higher overall earnings.

We’re still early, so this is best suited for creators who want to get in early, help shape the platform, and grow with it.

Happy to answer anything else

I'm going to be blunt. I think you need to to have a meeting and redesign your pitch.

your usp is non existent and your "why your better than the competition" is "we think you'll make more money" with no evidence as to why that would be the case.

Also load your website on desktop, Mobile first means mobile first not mobile only, when you lead the site on desktop it looks like your running a mobile browser on the browser window, it's honestly pretty awful.

I build a lot of software to combat platforms short comings (both for myself and for other people). And you have both the same features and same things missing as every other site.

You need someone working with / for you that had been in the industry and knows the failing points of all the current platforms so you can address then directly rather than taking a guess.

it's kind of like someone designing a commercial kitchen that has never worked in one before, your not going to know the flow of things.

There are 100% things that you could improve over existing sites which would being more creators in.

Also you want referrals on customers not on models imo. the platform itself should be what brings the creators , you then need to insentivise them to bring their audience.

 

[GoonGold]

Hey Marty, thanks for the detailed response. It's not often you get replies that aren't memes and flaming in this day and age. I can appreciate your critique, and I'm sure you can appreciate the tunnel-vision of development.

If you're interested to chat I'd love to follow-up on some of your concerns and what GG looks like from a third-party perspective. Doesn't look like we can initiate DMs here due to our limited post history but let us know if you're interested in talking.

Thanks again,
GG Tom

 

[LilyLaughing]

Is this site designed for male performers?

FYI the 15% banner is off - you are taking 15% and offered 85% correct? Cuz the way the banner reads is the opposite… and this little oversight kinda shows that you are looking at things from your perspective, not that of the model. If you aren’t pitching to models correctly, how are you pitching to cam viewers?

 

[Legalius]

How does using your site benefit me over using another more established site