Feeling unsafe on stripchat! Ultimate who stays invisible and never chats or spends! Stalker behavior!

[Deleted member 97791]

I’d like some feedback on how to deal with this issue on stripchat. The second I log in to stream on stripchat I have an ultimate user who shows up every single time. They never chat, never tip so I have no way to block them. Most of the time I’m totally dressed, no nudity whatsoever and they are still there. It feels like stalker behavior. I’ve reached out to stripchat about this and they see no issue as they say the person is not disrupting the stream. However to see the invisible there 24/7 everyday does make it uncomfortable. If they didn’t want to stalk or intimate you the ultimate invisible could simply choose to watch not logged in. But then choosing to make their presence know is what appears to be stalking to me.
Any advice on how to handle this?

 

[Natural9]

@Natural9



I believe you are referring to our White Labels? Our White Labels works exactly like Stripchat itself. Users can buy and tip models from that site too - for example, XHamsterLive.



Again do you mean our White Labels? Because the statement is not true - White Labels are not the ones recording models. Models themselves can even turn on recordings for public and private shows. But recordings that get uploaded to pirate sites can be taken down through our DMCA box on the models page. Models who need assistance with this are welcome to contact me directly.

No I am not referring to your "white labels". In the room in the user list you see users from xhamster with username@xh in the user list... I am talking about the users at the bottom of the list where it says +200 more users without tokens. What other "white labels" are there because in all of my years on the site I have not seen anyone in a room except for xhamster users.

Again I am not talking about your "white labels" .. for these "pirate sites" to have recordings of every model online including private shows seems as though they are getting the same data the site gets and recording it.

 

[Maxi]

No I am not referring to your "white labels". In the room in the user list you see users from xhamster with username@xh in the user list... I am talking about the users at the bottom of the list where it says +200 more users without tokens. What other "white labels" are there because in all of my years on the site I have not seen anyone in a room except for xhamster users.

Again I am not talking about your "white labels" .. for these "pirate sites" to have recordings of every model online including private shows seems as though they are getting the same data the site gets and recording it.

You just seem to be talking about and making a connection between viewers who aren’t logged in and pirate websites that host pirated show recordings.

There are loads of white-labelled sites - xhamsterlive, celebjihad, spankbanglive, for example. Those aren’t what you appear to be talking about.

 

[Natural9]

You just seem to be talking about and making a connection between viewers who aren’t logged in and pirate websites that host pirated show recordings.

There are loads of white-labelled sites - xhamsterlive, celebjihad, spankbanglive, for example. Those aren’t what you appear to be talking about.

I have never seen anyone from a site other than xhamster in a room. Evidently the others are not made as apparent as xhamster users that have "@xh" at the end of their username when in a room on SC.
My point is that the "pirate sites" need to have complete access to the sites data stream to be able to record every model online public and private shows.

 

[Maxi]

I have never seen anyone from a site other than xhamster in a room. Evidently the others are not made as apparent as xhamster users that have "@xh" at the end of their username when in a room on SC.
My point is that the "pirate sites" need to have complete access to the sites data stream to be able to record every model online public and private shows.

I’m an xhamsterlive user and I don’t have @xh tacked on to my username. I think that just denotes that they were originally xhamster users and transferred to xhamsterlive.

 

[Natural9]

I’m an xhamsterlive user and I don’t have @xh tacked on to my username. I think that just denotes that they were originally xhamster users and transferred to xhamsterlive.

Maybe that has changed but I usually see the "@xh" attached to usernames from there... no other "white label" has ever had any identifier like that. I am wondering what the difference between "white labels" and affiliate sites is.

 

[misterical]

You just seem to be talking about and making a connection between viewers who aren’t logged in and pirate websites that host pirated show recordings.

There are loads of white-labelled sites - xhamsterlive, celebjihad, spankbanglive, for example. Those aren’t what you appear to be talking about.

Celebjihad sounds like a challenging, and somewhat dangerously named wank.

 

[Maxi]

Celebjihad sounds like a challenging, and somewhat dangerously named wank.

100% - it’s already been called out here (a few times on this forum, I think.)

Post in thread 'A place for your ideas and suggestions'

Mar 16, 2025

I just noticed this going through the API documentation for Stripcash (See attached picture). I've mentioned issues before with using terms like Shemale, Transvestites in your categories for Trans streamers and this was largely ignored with a response saying for some regions it could be considered acceptable. Why these terms aren't also determined by region then still confuses me but that's a separate issue.

This example is absolutely unacceptable though. It's disappointing to see something that is very obviously a slur being used as a category for a whole group of users. You can't...

• NaomiNSFW

• 

 

[misterical]

Not worthy of it's own thread but definitely related to this one. Visible stalkers and harassers. There's a model I moderate for and there's a guy that pops up, talks endless shit to the point of getting annoying, gets blocked, then seconds later is back with an alternative account doing the same thing again. English isn't his first language so it's very easy to notice the same idiosyncrasies in his speech. More to the point, the time between one being blocked and the other appearing in the room seems about exactly one logins worth of time. It's like some kind of insane whack-a-mole getting rid of him because he's a complete nuisance. It's on a site where you can't prevent non-spenders from chatting so there is no defence.

It seems to me that a lot of camsites have a lot of features and freedoms that are more readily exploited by big spenders and freeloaders, as opposed to the members in the middle of those two.