AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Objectification

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Evvie

I haven't posted recently, hopefully will be back soon!
Inactive Cam Model
Feb 12, 2012
6,720
27,507
161
Righteo. So I don't really "get" objectification.

From what I understand, it's a bit like this:

Some fellows are standing around a Home Depot, indicating that they work in construction and will help you with various projects. You say to your friend, "I wonder if one of those guys will help us build the fence? Because let's face it, we're both pretty stupid about fences," and your friend starts yelling at you, "How DARE YOU OBJECTIFY THAT MAN. He is not a LABORER, he is a HUMAN BEING with a SOUL and probably a family and he probably likes to walk his dogs to opera music," and you say, "how can you possibly know that?" and your friend says, "the point is, I'm disgusted you looked at a construction worker and thought he could help us build the fence. You completely objectified him." And you say, "Yes, but he is clearly a construction worker looking for work." And then you're not friends with that person anymore.

Apparently, "objectifying" someone is this huge big sin I never really knew was that big of a deal. It seems a bit like white guilt to me. If you walk in to a strip club and see an especially radical stripper doing amazing pole dance stuff, and you say, "wow, that woman sure is talented and therefore gets me hot in the pants," apparently that's objectification because all you're seeing is her performance on stage and not her inner goddess soul. But if you go to a PTA meeting, and your kid's teacher is especially well informed and seems great with the kids, and you say, "wow, she sure is a great teacher," nobody pisses on you even though you objectified her as much as the stripper. It seems to me that whenever people feel uncomfortable with something, any recognition of it is evil "objectification."

Here is my take on it:

When you freak out because someone is "objectified," it really means two things:
1. You don't really care about what that person wants for themselves. It is about you and your own feelings of guilt.
2. You instantly and equally objectify any person as being a poor lost soul who is used by cruel people that needs to be taken care of by you, because they are clearly not doing a good enough job.

When I was working at a crappy deli for $8 an hour for 8 or 12 hours at a time, nobody came up to me and said, "You're too smart for this. You need to stop objectifying yourself as a sandwich maker. You don't use your brain in this job, it's all about using your body for menial tasks. You need to finish college and do something that will fulfill you." Even though people were using me to clean dishes and make sandwiches all day, it was never an issue, because nobody is uncomfortable with a sandwich maker.

Now, with camming, when I make much more, use my brain 500% more, use life skills every day, have a better schedule, and am more empowered and in control of my life, people love nothing more than to say, "You're too smart for this. You need to stop objectifying yourself as an erotic worker. You don't use your brain in this job, it's all about using your body for sexual intent."

So let's say that you believe any number of jobs or occupations truly objectify the workers, and not just because you are uncomfortable with them. You really believe those people are being used as objects.

My response to that is... so? It is not your job to control other people's lives or pass judgement on what you think they should be doing. If you really do believe that everyone who works on Streamate is objectified or every dentist is just an object used for cleaning our teeth, it may be time to ask yourself what makes you better, smarter, and more qualified than those people to the extent where they need you (a stranger) to influence and control their lives for their own betterment.

Personally, I do not want every single person who comes in to my chatroom to want to know my innermost female emotions and experiences, so they can understand my mind and soul. It's called boundaries. And yet, some people still believe that if you don't talk to a sex worker and really get to know her, you're just using her - whether or not she wants that connection with you. Again, it's not about her, it's about you.

People "see" sex workers as objects every day, just as we see fry cooks just as people to make us food, IT workers as people there to fix our stuff, and bankers as people to hopefully not make our money disappear. I would argue that, with the exception of the genuinely sociopathic, very few people actually look at a person and say, "That person is no better than a microwave or DVD boxset of Friends. If I so decided on a whim, I would not think second about bashing in his head with a baseball bat in a reenactment of that scene from Office Space. After all, he is not a human being."

I feel when people cry objectification, it's a vague "maybe there's more to that person than what is indicated by their surface appearance, so you should probably interact with them as such" meaning to it. And yet people still treat it like it's the biggest evil the modern world has ever seen since organized religion.
 
I am not really good at objectifying people. I always want to know why. I guess that makes me a nosey bastard.
 
The cry about objectification, as far as I know, got started during the women's right's movement, when women were tired of being objectified as homemakers and mothers. They were sick of being told they shouldn't worry their pretty little heads about things they actually cared about. In that sense, yes, it is evil. Any abuser who objectifies his/her victims is being evil.

But in the main, I agree with you. It has become the cry of whiney teenagers who don't really understand what it was all about. It was never about the entire world seeing into a person's heart, mind and soul. It was always about those people who are close to the person seeing into the heart, mind, and soul. It's not about getting to know everyone deeply, it's about realizing that everyone has a deeper side and giving them at least a bit of respect.
 
wow. that has to be the most complete breakdown of an outmoded idea i have ever seen. the idea of objectification has a major flaw at its root. the idea being that women are incapable of making decisions for themselves. to assume that anyone can objectify another assumes that the person being objectified has no mind, power or volition of their own. i think it rude to view any and all women as sex objects merely because they have a vagina, but when someone makes the decision to work in the adult industry on any of its levels it is a choice, which inherently makes it impossible to objectify them without also insulting them.

the secondary assumption that anyone in the adult industry is "wasting" their time, intellect or anything else is also very very past its time. with the advent of the internet and individual driven generation of erotic/adult materials even a casual job doing it takes brain power, will power and self confidence that is hard to find in most career choices. from the nude model to the prostitute sex/adult workers are to a great degree empowering themselves in a way that wasnt possible 20 or 30 years ago. in the modern era we must cease to view adult workers as broken or damaged because they choose that career path instead of a more old fashioned one.

as a guy ive always had to be careful not to let my natural appreciation of the female form be overly noticeable lest the very word under discussion paint me as a cretin. one can love a woman, or women on many levels. the body, the mind, the sexual, even in a religious/spiritual way. ideally when you are with someone you have all of em together. but for those segments of the world that arent the wife/significant other any way of appreciating someone is a good thing. if a man finds a woman beautiful and smiles for it, or vice versa, where is the harm? how does this lessen the person being appreciated? when you first meet a person sight is the primary sense we use to perceive them, scent and sound being secondary for sighted persons. if that person has a job where the work is based in sex and arousal then what the hell is the point of not enjoying what is being provided with skill and effort? isnt that more objectifying to say " jeez, you are naked, so i have to pretend that it isnt nice"?

i dunno, maybe its just me, but women are in general such wonderful entities that to ignore any single facet of them is just plain dumb
 
:lol:
 

Attachments

  • images (1).jpg
    images (1).jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 441
  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 441
HarmlessSquirrel said:
What a strange thread: nobody's said a single thing I disagree with. I don't really have anything to add -- just wanted to say to Evvie, that was a freaking brilliant post.
I'm sure they will come :lol:
 
Nordling said:
:-D Maybe strip clubs should have to have signs out front that say "OBJECTIFICATION HERE." LOL
Or maybe,
WOMEN HAVE CHOSEN TO DANCE NAKED HERE FOR MONEY
IF THIS BOTHERS YOU, DO NOT ENTER

Gosh. Time to go do laundry before I sit here thinking of all the funny signs strip clubs should have outside of them.

:dance:
 
Evvie said:
Some fellows are standing around a Home Depot, indicating that they work in construction and will help you with various projects. You say to your friend, "I wonder if one of those guys will help us build the fence? Because let's face it, we're both pretty stupid about fences," and your friend starts yelling at you, "How DARE YOU OBJECTIFY THAT MAN. He is not a LABORER, he is a HUMAN BEING with a SOUL and probably a family and he probably likes to walk his dogs to opera music," and you say, "how can you possibly know that?" and your friend says, "the point is, I'm disgusted you looked at a construction worker and thought he could help us build the fence. You completely objectified him." And you say, "Yes, but he is clearly a construction worker looking for work." And then you're not friends with that person anymore.

I hate it when that happens :-D

(And I agree with your post, bb :thumbleft: )
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna and Evvie
I thought Evvie's thread was going to be a sexy story how the women got a fence built in exchange for having sex.

Anyhow, I confess to not reading all of the previous posts, but the only time I recall hearing any use of the word 'objectifying,' it was in direct relation to scantily clad or nekkid women, whether it be pornography, strip clubs, sexy posters, beauty pageants, etcetera.
 
Bocefish said:
I thought Evvie's thread was going to be a sexy story how the women got a fence built in exchange for having sex.

Anyhow, I confess to not reading all of the previous posts, but the only time I recall hearing any use of the word 'objectifying,' it was in direct relation to scantily clad or nekkid women, whether it be pornography, strip clubs, sexy posters, beauty pageants, etcetera.
The only times I've heard it used are in relation to sexualized women (never sexualized men) and jobs people might consider demeaning or something, like migrant workers are "objectified" by the people they work for.

I think it's kind of like being offended for people because you're uncomfortable that they have to do things you find distasteful, with the added insult that they don't know any better. So people just tout off something about how "you should objectify them" to make themselves feel like they're some part of a solution, when in reality, chiding someone for objectifying someone else is going to have the exact same effect as liking a facebook status because you think it will magically raise money for a cause or actually help someone in reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
Interesting post, but I don't think in your example that your friend knows what objectification is. If anything, you might have been stereotyping but you were not objectifying them.

Objectifying things is part of human nature. Without it we would have a difficult time killing animals for food or killing people in wars. Not that those are necessarily good things.
 
I'm ok with you objectifying me but only if you let me do it to you as well. ;) First we'll have to get naked though. Trust me, it's the only way this will work.
 
I could write so many words on this, but will not. Just leave you with this:

Objectification is in the eye of the beholder.

If you don't get it, see me after class.
 
RogueWarrior said:
I could write so many words on this, but will not. Just leave you with this:

Objectification is in the eye of the beholder.

If you don't get it, see me after class.
So the first video game I ever played was Baldur's Gate, a dungeons and dragons game, and for the vast majority of my life I believed the prase "in the eye of the beholder" was somehow a reference to the monster, and I really did not understand what beholder eyes had to do with anything.
 
Oh, where is Germaine Greer or even Camille Paglia to explain stuff? It strikes me that the word "objectify" in this context, like so many other words, has changed its meaning a lot in the last 50 years. :)
 
Damn, I thought this thread was about being objectified. I was looking forward to being put up on a pedestal and worshiped by adoring masses. I look fabulous on an alter. Especially marble.
 
NerdgasmGirl said:
Damn, I thought this thread was about being objectified. I was looking forward to being put up on a pedestal and worshiped by adoring masses. I look fabulous on an alter. Especially marble.
I have a feeling you'd make one busty bust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diana Blake
I mostly hear the word "objectify" tossed out when it comes to female sex workers. Maybe when i cam i'm being objectified but who really cares? That's what i'm there for. I find the dudes who are quick to point out how they don't "objectify" you and that they are the only true gentlemen left in the world are the guys i end up banning pretty quick. They inevitably put on their cape and show me their magic powers of saving me from the horrible wankers who only want me for my vag.
 
Jaydenrainey said:
They inevitably put on their cape and show me their magic powers of saving me from the horrible wankers who only want me for my vag.

Is it really one or the other? Am I not allowed to like vag, and talking to people and learning about them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaydenrainey
Shaun__ said:
Jaydenrainey said:
They inevitably put on their cape and show me their magic powers of saving me from the horrible wankers who only want me for my vag.

Is it really one or the other? Am I not allowed to like vag, and talking to people and learning about them?
I feel that Jayden is talking about a different kind of people.

Fellows such as yourself, who have a genuine interest in the ladies, are pretty nifty. But there is also an entire other group of men whom, while they say they want to get to know us, are just looking for an "in" to make us feel guilty about what we do and convince us to try and quit camming because their superior male brains know better.
 
Evvie said:
Shaun__ said:
Jaydenrainey said:
They inevitably put on their cape and show me their magic powers of saving me from the horrible wankers who only want me for my vag.

Is it really one or the other? Am I not allowed to like vag, and talking to people and learning about them?
I feel that Jayden is talking about a different kind of people.

Fellows such as yourself, who have a genuine interest in the ladies, are pretty nifty. But there is also an entire other group of men whom, while they say they want to get to know us, are just looking for an "in" to make us feel guilty about what we do and convince us to try and quit camming because their superior male brains know better.



alas! this is the very thing i have trouble with. menfolk seem to assume that the male perspective is better. and all humans seem to believe the same about their own opinions. this goes for politics, religion etc, not just the subject at hand. i personally gave up bashing the guys who do either end of the scale. the self righteous "wankers" are just as annoying as the "can i see your asshole/feet/gyno shot" ones.
its why i have to take breaks from MFC or begin to despise the human race as a whole. rudeness is rudeness no matter the intent. you can call me an asshole if you say it politely and i wont even get angry (yes, thats a literal example, i have a friend who says it to me when i get on my soapbox or in a foul mood) on the other hand you can pay me a compliment in such a way that ill want to BE an asshole to you. that is a slight digression, but it applies to the wankers and the beggers(sic)

maybe some day the last of the chauvinists will fade away and a newer kind of man can exist in the open, but its decades away at best. til then even people like me who try hard to keep an open mind and accept every individual for who they are without making assumptions will be so used to having to do just that, that everyone will be a bit of a dick in self defense.
 
Jaydenrainey said:
I mostly hear the word "objectify" tossed out when it comes to female sex workers. Maybe when i cam i'm being objectified but who really cares? That's what i'm there for. I find the dudes who are quick to point out how they don't "objectify" you and that they are the only true gentlemen left in the world are the guys i end up banning pretty quick. They inevitably put on their cape and show me their magic powers of saving me from the horrible wankers who only want me for my vag.

Yup. In my experience, true gentlemen would never, ever, ever refer to themselves as gentlemen. True gentlemen don't need to. :twocents-02cents:
 
Evvie, thanks. I so heartily agree. We are all acting as both subjects and objects, all the time. That's why we have pronoun cases for each. I am (needless for a camgirl to say) quite content being an object of the 'male gaze.' But I do yearn for more (&/or less silly) male objectification in our world. Their triceps can be so beautiful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
BetsyBooty said:
Evvie, thanks. I so heartily agree. We are all acting as both subjects and objects, all the time. That's why we have pronoun cases for each. I am (needless for a camgirl to say) quite content being an object of the 'male gaze.' But I do yearn for more (&/or less silly) male objectification in our world. Their triceps can be so beautiful.


um hello? what about shoulders? other than my lips theyre my best physical feature. please, feel free to ogle either lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
Personally, I prefer a man's back. I mean, watching his back muscles flex under a layer of disguising fat while he does exercises is just... mmm
 
but southsamurai,

if it's hair how will I see the ripples under the fat?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.