Bocefish said:
Jupiter551 said:
I think he got away with murder through a bunch of technicalities.
How so?
Can you specify those "bunch of technicalities" the prosecution failed at?
I'm beginning to realize why your government so easily disarmed you.
They didn't disarm me, I can go out and buy a range of shotguns (which can be then sawn-off), rifles the type of which served in several wars - both of which are perfectly capable of killing a man at short and medium/long range respectively - if I were crazy enough to go out and buy such weapons and shoot each other with them.
The government didn't disarm us, MOST of us recognised in large part that putting guns where unstable people can get their hands on them is like putting poisonous medicine where kids can play with it. Don't bother linking that 15 year old hackneyed youtube video originally broadcast by Australia's unfortunate equivalent of The O'Reilly Factor, and featuring rural gun-nut miniorities and probably about 50% gun-shop owners from all over.
I never said they were technicalities the prosecution failed at.
1) There were two witnesses to the entire event, one was shot and killed by the other.
2)It is logically impossible to prove a negative - therefore you cannot 'prove' what did or didn't happen in those moments. We do know however that witness testimonies dispute one another.
3) The self-defense argument is a joke - his wounds don't match those of anyone even CLOSE to being in danger for their life. That goes for whether theyre visible or not. He declined going to hospital and the EMT paramedics said he was fine and would be able to go home. Medical examiner testifies under oath that his injuries were 'very insignificant'. In other words, NOT the kinds of injuries that either match his story of having his head bashed on concrete 25 times OR any reasonable belief that he would have felt in danger for his life, and so much so he couldn't draw the gun and issue a warning to get off etc.
4)Martin was a few inches taller, and weighed about 40 pounds less than Zimmerman. One witness said the bigger man was on top - in the dark and lying in the grass it would be very easy to consider the heavier man as the larger one.
5) Zimmerman claimed he didn't know Martin was dead, and indeed the ME testified that Martin could have lived for up to ten minutes. Zimmerman claimed he spread Martin's arms apart 'searching for a weapon', but his callousness shines through in that even though Martin was obviously no longer any kind of threat, he obviously didn't even attempt to apply any kind of first aid or even take his pulse!!
6) Who knows what Z did in those 10 minutes while Trayvon was dying and witnesses were calling the police? Trying to bash his head on the pavement a couple times (but not deep enough to be convincing - hey, it's hard to really hurt yourself cos it fucking HURTS)? Headbutting a wall to break his nose? Who knows.
7. Why did Trayvon's hands have no blood on them or Z's skin under the fingernails? Oh because it was raining? but there was a photo of Trayvon's body at the crime scene covered by a yellow plastic sheet. Also why, in that case, did Z still have blood on his face, even in the rain? Was it because his blood came up to 10 minutes after the 'fight' occurred?
8)the DNA - this should have been a slam-dunk. How ironic that the defense kept accusing the the prosecution of talking about 'coulda-beens' and 'what-ifs' and then claims Zimmerman's DNA 'may have' disappeared from Martin's clothes due to improper evidence processing (how convenient). Then there's the gun that Zimmerman himself claimed Martin grabbed but then Martin's DNA mysteriously disappeared (but I believe Zimmerman's remained). And yeah, both of those 'coulda-beens' seem incredibly unlikely but apparently this preposterously unlikely story worked.
If the above is true then perhaps the real tragedy here is that Zimmerman may have murdered a non-DNA secreting one-of-a-kind mutant.
BTW HiGirls, Cenk declined change of anchor time on NBC, not really the same as 'can't keep a job'.
He's an award-winning journalist and creator of the Young Turks that have won so far in the last few years (this list is 2 years out of date):
The Young Turks has won the 2009 Podcast Award in the "Political" category,[25] as well as the 2009 Mashable Open Web Award for the "Best Political News Site".[26] In March 2011, the show won a Shorty award. In the 2011 Webby Awards, The Young Turks won the People's Voice award in the news and politics series category.[27]