They do not. There is nothing in TOS that says I have to pay attention to the user in private with no distractions whatsoever nor does it say models have to stop shows on other sites while doing privates on CB. Nor anything on this support page that says that, either.
"Private shows let you get your favorite broadcasters in a room to yourself." (https://support.chaturbate.com/hc/en-us/articles/360035584832-What-is-a-private-show)
I figured you would cherry pick that one and that's why I didn't post it because that page doesn't detail the situation like the one I posted does. I'll give you that SC is crazy anal about the exclusivity part of their TOS, but Chaturbate is not and has never been like that.
My point is not about what a particular site will enforce but what a viewer's reasonable expectations are. Unless "private show" is synonymous with "group show" on particular site, OP's expectations that the model he's doing a private show with is giving him exclusive attention is not unreasonable. It is, though, a little naïve, and if he's not willing to have an explicit conversation with her about his expectations and to find out about her setup after a year then that's on him.
But he was on SC and there's an exclusive show option that he chose not to pay for that prevents this whole thing from being a thing in the first place.
He didn't say what site he was on, but let's say it was SC. If the model was also streaming on, say, CB, and kept her cam open there and continued accepting tips and requests there during the private show then it would reflect his concern. And before we say anything about SC's TOS, there are studios that require their models to keep CB open when they do privates on SC, even exclusive privates.
But he's complaining about the TOS portion of this situation. Not what studios are doing. Most viewers either aren't aware of studios or very quickly forget about them. At any rate, this is now circular and I'm out. Have a good night!
I think we're reading different messages because he doesn't once reference the TOS. His concern is that he feels like he doesn't know everything that the model knows and that her actions suggest that she's interacting with other viewers during his private show. This indeed happens all the time and he's 100% right to feel uneasy because it's probably the truth. Most viewers have not been exposed to the behind-the-scenes intricacies of modelling and she probably is interacting with other guys. What he needs to do, though, is have a direct conversation with the model and state his expectations and probably also do a little sleuthing on his own to find out the truth because...shocker...models don't always tell viewers everything.
I think it’s a bit weird to suggest a viewer needs to do any “sleuthing”. Private show is over, move on and do other more productive or entertaining things.
I am a viewer first and foremost. OP -- a viewer -- raised a legitimate question and this thread was very quickly hijacked by models talking about their preferred ways of doing things and then misrepresenting the actual question that was asked.
If someone is going to make a significant time investment then they should know what they're actually getting into. That means doing their best to peel back the layers of often misinformation that viewers are often presented with. I'm not talking about finding out personal information about models, but, in this case, to at least understand if a model is streaming on 1 or 2 or 8 sites and how they deal with those interactions. Speaking from my own personal experience and from talking with other viewers, not knowing how things work behind the scenes can have long-term emotional costs because of exactly the kind of uncertainly that OP is expressing.
You need therapy. It's porn. Stop overthinking it.
If any of the responses had actually addressed OP then that would be great. But @Vixxen81 has made it very clear that viewers' perspectives and concerns don't matter so we'll just leave it there.
lol yikes... I think this is being overthought as well. It's not that the viewers' perspectives don't matter, its just that if OP feels the way they feel about it, move on to another model. The first response in this thread is just that and it should totally suffice. We just went on a tangent because we starting thinking/chatting about what they may have been looking at.
Nooooo
The actual issue I'm having with the OP itself is that it comes off as wanting to shame the model publicly. Sure there may be a reasonable expectation of having a model's full attention, but they can always contact support if they feel a rule has been violated. This person just wanted their feelings validated that this model is doing something morally wrong when she probably wasnt.
^This. I held off replying because it's posted in A-a-M, but when I read the original post I thought it was jumping to conclusions about where the model appeared to be looking.
Yes, both independent and studios. I share the same thoughts. Even AI can do that very impressively, but we also have to recognize that some models can get away with just sitting on their phones all the time haha.
