A different look for her.

[schlmoe]

Olivia has the right to put on whatever show she feels is entertaining.

And members have the right to occasionally get offended.

Actually she doesn't. It is not her right, it is up to MFC. MFC being a private entity has no obligation to allow her free speech. If they decide her shows are offensive or costing them business, they can shut her down anytime they like.

I'm not a Constitutional Scholar or a lawyer, but I believe you are wrong on this point. Entertainers have long had 1st Amendment protection, and there are many court precedents to support this right. Same goes for pornography, even though MFC is not a "porn site" :lol: This information is readily available on the net, so I won't link any examples. We have Lenny Bruce, George Carlin, and Larry Flynt (among many others) to thank for this.

I highly doubt it would get this far. If a camgirl is not breaking any listed "rules", and is making money for the site, it is very unlikely MFC would do anything. If MFC did suspend/ban the camgirl, she could easily go to another site (or create her own). She could also "go public", claim censorship and hit the talk show circuit, etc. and find that she would be more in demand than ever...all without having to throw this into the judicial system

Of course, this is all hypothetical. She's currently ranked #2, and will most likely end up in the top 5. MFC is not interested in making less money, and we all know that controversy sells :twocents-02cents:

**Note: All this 1st Amendment talk would only pertain to a US based model.

 

[Nordling]

The first amendment only pertains to government censorship. A private business can censor people who are using their facilities. You may have a point though if they were to expel a model that was not breaking any listed rules, but they could easily change the rules.

If private businesses or other private entities were proscribed from censorship, then millions of people banned from message boards, chat rooms and blogs could go to court and win.

 

[Just Me]

Olivia has the right to put on whatever show she feels is entertaining.

And members have the right to occasionally get offended.

Actually she doesn't. It is not her right, it is up to MFC. MFC being a private entity has no obligation to allow her free speech. If they decide her shows are offensive or costing them business, they can shut her down anytime they like.

I'm not a Constitutional Scholar or a lawyer, but I believe you are wrong on this point. Entertainers have long had 1st Amendment protection, and there are many court precedents to support this right. Same goes for pornography, even though MFC is not a "porn site" :lol: This information is readily available on the net, so I won't link any examples. We have Lenny Bruce, George Carlin, and Larry Flynt (among many others) to thank for this.

I highly doubt it would get this far. If a camgirl is not breaking any listed "rules", and is making money for the site, it is very unlikely MFC would do anything. If MFC did suspend/ban the camgirl, she could easily go to another site (or create her own). She could also "go public", claim censorship and hit the talk show circuit, etc. and find that she would be more in demand than ever...all without having to throw this into the judicial system

Of course, this is all hypothetical. She's currently ranked #2, and will most likely end up in the top 5. MFC is not interested in making less money, and we all know that controversy sells :twocents-02cents:

**Note: All this 1st Amendment talk would only pertain to a US based model.

Sorry, I am not wrong about this point. As Nordling commented as well, 1st amendment rights only pertain when the US government tries to pass laws limiting free speech. MFC as a private company can limit free speech all they want on their site.

 

[AllisonWilder]

I caught my first OliviaNaked show tonight. Amazing. She was dressed as a pirate with a bunny tail. She was playing pirate music, flying a white flag in surrender off a broom and went off-screen for a minute and came back wearing a life jacket saying safety first. I think she's great.

 

[Nordling]

Her sustained energy is amazing, more amazing than the huge tips she gets continuously.

 

[SoTxBob]

a cap from tonight's creativity... :-D

 

[SoTxBob]

In the beginning... music cued and she broke into hiphop dancin' to DrDre and Snoop.... complete with fake doobie to toke on... :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[AedanRayne]

I want to marry Olivia, but the pope doesn't approve of gay marriage.

 

[MrRodry]

I want to marry Olivia, but the pope doesn't approve of gay marriage.

:lol:

 

[Jupiter551]

She's certainly very imaginative, must go to a lot of trouble to get the costumes too. Good on her.

 

[CorinneCooper]

Olivia is by far my favorite girl to perv on. I love the intellect and thought she puts into things.

 

[Nordling]

Tonight it's a diaper, pacifier and huge safety pin motif.

 

[CorinneCooper]

That was actually pretty late in the night... that didn't come out until after 10 CST.... some of the guys were teasing her about her bathroom visits so she said... FINE! There shall be no more peeing tonight!! Then came back with that little number on

 

[ComicOzzie]

That was actually pretty late in the night... that didn't come out until after 10 CST.... some of the guys were teasing her about her bathroom visits so she said... FINE! There shall be no more peeing tonight!! Then came back with that little number on

So she had a spare diaper and a huge safety pin just laying around? Holy crap!

 

[Mr_Wilde]

I can't believe I've read every single post on here. I'm curious to see with my own eyes what this chick is like in action.

Olivia has the right to put on whatever show she feels is entertaining.

And members have the right to occasionally get offended.

Actually she doesn't. It is not her right, it is up to MFC. MFC being a private entity has no obligation to allow her free speech. If they decide her shows are offensive or costing them business, they can shut her down anytime they like.

I'm not a Constitutional Scholar or a lawyer, but I believe you are wrong on this point. Entertainers have long had 1st Amendment protection, and there are many court precedents to support this right. Same goes for pornography, even though MFC is not a "porn site" :lol: This information is readily available on the net, so I won't link any examples. We have Lenny Bruce, George Carlin, and Larry Flynt (among many others) to thank for this.

I highly doubt it would get this far. If a camgirl is not breaking any listed "rules", and is making money for the site, it is very unlikely MFC would do anything. If MFC did suspend/ban the camgirl, she could easily go to another site (or create her own). She could also "go public", claim censorship and hit the talk show circuit, etc. and find that she would be more in demand than ever...all without having to throw this into the judicial system

**Note: All this 1st Amendment talk would only pertain to a US based model.

As others have already said I'm guessing your statement isn't entirely accurate. I'd have to show my business law professor this post to be certain. Outside of her MFC employment she can do what ever she wants but if MFC felt they need to censor her it's within their rights as a business.

 

[Tilly]

I like that she does things that are different and interesting for the viewers, but there are also times when I just don't get it, and when I don't get it, I wonder how the hell the members in the room are perceiving it. I think she is the closest I have seen to performance art, which is quite nice, but sometimes it's a bit goofy too. The Taliban/terrorist get up was kind of a weird choice, but hey, she pulled it off somehow, so more power to her. It would be cool if more members in my chat were more lax about stuff. Sometimes I feel like they take every word I say to heart, and that can be pretty daunting!

 

[ComicOzzie]

I was in Posie's room last night (she is currently battling with Olivia for the #1 spot) and she was dressed as a pirate for International Pirate Day or whatever it was yesterday. She was very entertaining as well, also in a non-nude way.

 

[SoTxBob]

lol.. im also amazed at the relaxed room Olivia keeps. I've seen so many uptight asshats on the site and so few are ever heard from in her chats.... I wonder about the callers on her "nude radio call in"..... How she manages to not scream and pull her hair out with some of them is a feat in itself. :-D

 

[BabyGirlRed]

Happening right now. Fapfapfap

 

[Jupiter551]

I was in Posie's room last night (she is currently battling with Olivia for the #1 spot) and she was dressed as a pirate for International Pirate Day or whatever it was yesterday. She was very entertaining as well, also in a non-nude way.

ahh that explains why I was struggling through a tutorial about setting environmental variables in win 7 written entirely in pirate yesterday...

 

[MiaMeow]

I really wanna watch her but shes never online when I check. What time does she usually cam?

 

[MiaMeow]

Nvm, I had the bright idea of looking at her profile! Duh, Mia.

 

[Tilly]

I was in Posie's room last night (she is currently battling with Olivia for the #1 spot) and she was dressed as a pirate for International Pirate Day or whatever it was yesterday. She was very entertaining as well, also in a non-nude way.

It's not that either of them NEVER show any skin, so I think it's a bit unfair to keep referring to both of them as non-nude models. If that were true, I wouldn't have seen Posie or Olivia's boobies. :twocents-02cents:

 

[LucyGoodtimes]

I was in Posie's room last night (she is currently battling with Olivia for the #1 spot) and she was dressed as a pirate for International Pirate Day or whatever it was yesterday. She was very entertaining as well, also in a non-nude way.

It's not that either of them NEVER show any skin, so I think it's a bit unfair to keep referring to both of them as non-nude models. If that were true, I wouldn't have seen Posie or Olivia's boobies. :twocents-02cents:

Agreed!!!! I mean, to get a bit technical (which I very much enjoy doing), I think non-nude models are those whose entertainment is totally non sexual. Like MJ (shes GoodFuckas now right?). She never dances around, pulls her clothes up or down, etc. Olivia is near this polar extreme, as her shows are more about entertainment than nudity - though the American Beauty skit was pretty fucking hot!! Anyway, Posie, to me, is a very very extended tease. She dances, tugs at her clothes, brings the focus of her shows (a majority of the time) to her body, sexual areas. She flashes her boobs or butt somewhat frequently. I actually see this quite often with other girls, being very explicit about beingnon nude but then their shows are all sexual teases, and I wonder if they are non nude for moral/comfort reasons, or is it all a business plan?

I just feel currently there's a lot of lip service being done (and I'm a part of it) about non nude models, how great it is they're sucessful, how smart and creative they are. So personally this is a bit of jealousy (do I make less money because I get naked every night? Did I miss that boat?) and also a call to reevaluate what we're really saying: that it's basically miraculous a clothed woman can hold the attention and love of a majority of mfc members.

I mean I do think what Olivia does is fucking fantastic because she REALLY broke out of the type of show you see on MFC. But lets not chalk up the miracle of her sucess to being just about not getting naked. Its great that she can rake in the kind of tokens she does while conducting shows that are really non sexual, but its awesome that she thought to do it in the first place.

 

[Zoomer]

She's actually very pretty... which I would assume is one major factor for any "non nude" (or not so nude) model to be successful. Being cute (like sweet_lore) helps as well.

Watched her for the first time last night and not sure what the fuss is about. Saw her "hobo" dressing up. Within 1 minute I appeared to have seen the vast majority of her repertoire. It was just watching the same movements for the next 10 mins. Lots of fake silent laughing, picking nose, excessive face shaping to appear dumb (intentional obviously).
Different, yes, but I can only assume there must be "so much more" to be seen to even register on an entertaining scale - I chuckled for the first 10 seconds, then I was bored stiff for the next 9 mins 50 seconds.

Obviously it'd do more justice to watch an entire night - but in 10 minutes she typed out "hi" a few times, did lots of (as said) same movements and that was literally it. The highlight was her several posts provoking a "model" (no idea if she was) who'd come in to see what Olivia was all about. Olivia played about 2 minutes of video footage from (one assumes) the other night when she was dressed as a cave girl (so playing a video instead of streaming from cam). This just highlighted that you couldn't tell the difference between her actually being there and not in all honesty... people coming in that time certainly didn't know.

Maybe a longer stint I would have seen her chatting, her dancing, her being more entertaining?

I left, not quite getting why she's supposed to be so amazing. Different? Yes. Entertaining? Didn't watch enough to be fair (based upon what I saw she is entertaining for one minute only - but its just 1 x 10 min snapshot and not fair to base it on that alone), but felt no charisma or anything likeable because she really didn't interact with anyone. Would I go back? No.

I will look in again another night to be more fair, but other than just being "radically different" in what she does - just hearing a model chat and talk to people is far more interesting/entertaining. Maybe if I watched more rooms in general and hung out in the lounge more I'd appreciate her more...

 

[BabyGirlRed]

Please tell me you guys caught this show. It was the most beautiful thing I have seen on MFC. Really. Very sensual and romantic.

 

[LucyGoodtimes]

I just want to add that the entertainment she provides taps into this very prevalent form of comedy you see a lot in tv and ads, where it's fairly random (strategically random) and very absurd. Like... Hmmm trying to think of some examples... Skittles adverts? You see it a lot on MTV these days. Not all of it sticks but some of it really does. Oh, viral videos on youtube! Thats a good one!

 

[Zoomer]

I just want to add that the entertainment she provides taps into this very prevalent form of comedy you see a lot in tv and ads, where it's fairly random (strategically random) and very absurd. Like... Hmmm trying to think of some examples... Skittles adverts? You see it a lot on MTV these days. Not all of it sticks but some of it really does. Oh, viral videos on youtube! Thats a good one!

Tried watching "Old Spice" adverts without sound... they just don't work without sound

 

[Nordling]

I find her shows interesting, very unique, but I have to agree partly with Zoomer--I would probably not become a regular. Maybe it's more about the members--constantly posting silly emotes. lol

I thought her Radio Show was the most interesting--since then she actually talks, and to live members on the phone.

BTW, does anyone know what part of the country/world she's from? Her accent I can't place.

 

[bob]

BTW, does anyone know what part of the country/world she's from? Her accent I can't place.

lotta people wondering that....including me :lol:
i have no idea...but my gut says edmonton or vancouver.....without a shred of evidence