AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

FBI Operated Child Porn Site to Nab Pedophiles

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Poker_Babe

Inactive Cam Model
Oct 31, 2010
3,182
5,964
213
Earth
thecamgirlreport.blogspot.com
Twitter Username
@Poker_Babe69
Tumblr Username
Pokerbabe69
MFC Username
A_Poker_Babe
Streamate Username
PokerCutie
Chaturbate Username
Poker_Babe
Clips4Sale URL
https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/78365/poker-princess--clip-store
FBI Operated Child Porn Site to Nab Pedophiles
Link to OP: http://www.xbiz.com/news/legal/163363

OMAHA, Neb. — The FBI seized and ran an online child pornography service late last year in an attempt to identify and prosecute its customers, SFGate reported yesterday.
The website exhibited thousands of images showing children being raped, displayed and abused and hosted message threads like, “How to lure a child in my car,” “Meeting other pedos in real life,” and “Do kids LIKE anal sex?” Upon closure, the site had 5,600 users and 24,000 posts.

Nebraska-based FBI agents seized the service, referred to only as “Website A” in a search warrant affidavit, on Nov. 16 and continued to operate it until Dec. 2, when it was shut down. A Seattle special agent told the court that the Bureau kept the site open in order to monitor messages from users. A U.S. District Court judge in Nebraska authorized law enforcement agents to track down the site’s user on Nov. 9.
“There have been past investigations that I am aware of where law enforcement has operated undercover, posed as members and even have become moderators of such boards allowing them to remain active while information and evidence is gathered,” Tim Henning, the executive director of the ASACP, told XBIZ. “This is the first time I am aware of that a federal law enforcement agency has actually taken complete control of such a board and allowed it to operate for the purpose of information gathering.”

Complicating the case is the fact that federal prosecutors often invoke the sentiment that every time child pornography is shared, the child is abused again. This line of reasoning has been used in court to refute the notion that the consumer’s role in child pornography is victimless.
While Website A operated under the arm of federal agents, its users continued to swap illicit images of children and access similar images stored on its database.

“The question here is, do the ends justify the means?” Henning said. “Did investigators weigh the damage to child victims whose images were allowed to be disseminated amongst the board’s members, while the board was under the control of the FBI, against the need to identify those board members that may continue to harm children if left unidentified?”

Accoring to SFGate, the FBI declined to comment on the Omaha branch’s motivations to operate the site, but court records indicate that investigators were not able to trace Website A’s users using “traditional means.”

Because the investigation is ongoing, local court rules and Department of Justice policy restrict discussion or release of information about the case. No one has been publicly prosecuted in relation to the investigation as of yet.

If charges are filed, they will become a matter of public record.
 
Nordling said:
Sounds like they "continued to operate the site in order to..." That's still operating the site--unless they removed all images and videos first.

The ends do not justify the means if the means result in the same crime.

I just read the article, and it said users were still accessing pictures stored on the site. That seems illegal to me, and wrong. Snowden already told us the the NSA basically monitors everything, with the unconstitutional prism program, so I do not see how the FBI could not find these people without doing that.
 
Shaun__ said:
Nordling said:
Sounds like they "continued to operate the site in order to..." That's still operating the site--unless they removed all images and videos first.

The ends do not justify the means if the means result in the same crime.

I just read the article, and it said users were still accessing pictures stored on the site. That seems illegal to me, and wrong. Snowden already told us the the NSA basically monitors everything, with the unconstitutional prism program, so I do not see how the FBI could not find these people without doing that.
Totally wrong--and more than criminal--it's insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poker_Babe
If they had shut it down as soon as it was seized, maybe that would send up the red flags while they're trying to collect data on people who'd already been visiting the site? Pedos are like cockroaches man. They run around together in the darkness, but hide at the first sign they've been noticed. I'm sure there was a better way of going about it than leaving horrible pics up for a few weeks. Maybe they could have busted the photo links and claimed a site malfunction that would be fixed soon? Of course, if they left people who weaponize sex in prison instead of waiting until they murder someone to hide the evidence, none of this would be necessary.
 
JickyJuly said:
If they had shut it down as soon as it was seized, maybe that would send up the red flags while they're trying to collect data on people who'd already been visiting the site? Pedos are like cockroaches man. They run around together in the darkness, but hide at the first sign they've been noticed. I'm sure there was a better way of going about it than leaving horrible pics up for a few weeks. Maybe they could have busted the photo links and claimed a site malfunction that would be fixed soon? Of course, if they left people who weaponize sex in prison instead of waiting until they murder someone to hide the evidence, none of this would be necessary.
I compare what they did with how pictures of victims are omitted from newspaper articles--especially when the victims are juveniles or minors. It's just common sense to not use the actual victimization to "catch a thief" so to speak.
 
There is no reason to believe that those pedophiles' activities were restricted to one single website. I doubt that disabling it for the 2 or 3 weeks in question would have suddenly improved the welfare of their victims noticeably. In the meantime, the evidence they could gather may well allow the FBI to put a bunch of those monsters away.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.