GOP Anti-Porn Plank Added To Draft Platform

[Shaun__]

Looks like the party of small government is once again trying to tell everyone how they need to live. Link

The new language replaces previous platform wording, which only opposed child pornography. It will now read, "Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced." Trueman noted that current federal obscenity laws not only prohibit distribution of hardcore pornography on the Internet but also on hotel/motel TV, on cable/satellite TV, and in retail shops.

 

[Evvie]

Good luck :lol:

 

[SophieMei]

I hate to be flippant but every time I read something like this all I can think is that these people must really hate their lives to have to take it out on everyone else.

 

[Nordling]

:lol: The term I learned from my mom, when she was referring to nosy neighbors is "busy body." Someone whose own life is apparently so desolate that they must put enormous energy into looking for ways to control other people's lives.

 

[bob]

Looks like the party of small government is once again trying to tell everyone how they need to live. Link

The new language replaces previous platform wording, which only opposed child pornography. It will now read, "Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced." Trueman noted that current federal obscenity laws not only prohibit distribution of hardcore pornography on the Internet but also on hotel/motel TV, on cable/satellite TV, and in retail shops.

:lol: The term I learned from my mom, when she was referring to nosy neighbors is "busy body." Someone whose own life is apparently so desolate that they must put enormous energy into looking for ways to control other people's lives.

that is indeed the term, and it could certainly be said to apply to this.... :thumbleft:

i'll play the devils advocate tho....the division i feel in america when people begin to talk political dogma is that both sides feel the other one is playing the game of dictating lifestyle....whether it be for a "bad" thing, like peering into the privacy of our lives and judging our sexual proclivities....or the "good" thing of restricting our freedom of choice by limiting the use of incandescent bulbs as a part of our emerging energy policy......which may or may not sound like a silly comparison on this forum

as the devil's advocate, i would take the libertarian pov and say "stay outta my life" to both arguements....but most of us will vote either the conservative or liberal pov....and both see their side as "socially responsible"
personally, i believe that unless we accept that absolute value of critical thinking in our public education system, and stop sacrificing it to the hopes and dreams we have about our kiddies "future success", all dogma surrounding the nature of social responsibility is illusion....and a good argument can be made that neither of the major political parties address the direction of public education.....tho both have ideas about "fixing" it :lol:

 

[JickyJuly]

I feel like the people who seek control like this must all be wackos behind closed doors. Otherwise, they would understand that the average person has a moral compass big enough to navigate through the world without inane laws.

Edited to add: Does anyone else quietly wonder if the GOP is purposely setting themselves up for loss? They could have had a pretty cut and dry victory this year considering how unimpressed people are with the current regime, but chose to run an unlikeable Mormon and paired him with Paul Ryan. Followed that by throwing in some woman bashing and porn outlawing just to see how many more people they can alienate before elections.

 

[Bocefish]

The majority of government is evil AFAIC. Beyond national defense, protecting human rights, and helping the truly helpless, they have overstepped their bounds in just about every aspect of our lives. The greedy bastages forget they work for the will of the people and not their special interests groups that line their pockets. Wish we could fire the whole bunch of 'em and start over.

 

[Poker_Babe]

 

[Nordling]

Looks like the party of small government is once again trying to tell everyone how they need to live. Link

The new language replaces previous platform wording, which only opposed child pornography. It will now read, "Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced." Trueman noted that current federal obscenity laws not only prohibit distribution of hardcore pornography on the Internet but also on hotel/motel TV, on cable/satellite TV, and in retail shops.

:lol: The term I learned from my mom, when she was referring to nosy neighbors is "busy body." Someone whose own life is apparently so desolate that they must put enormous energy into looking for ways to control other people's lives.

that is indeed the term, and it could certainly be said to apply to this.... :thumbleft:

i'll play the devils advocate tho....the division i feel in america when people begin to talk political dogma is that both sides feel the other one is playing the game of dictating lifestyle....whether it be for a "bad" thing, like peering into the privacy of our lives and judging our sexual proclivities....or the "good" thing of restricting our freedom of choice by limiting the use of incandescent bulbs as a part of our emerging energy policy......which may or may not sound like a silly comparison on this forum

as the devil's advocate, i would take the libertarian pov and say "stay outta my life" to both arguements....but most of us will vote either the conservative or liberal pov....and both see their side as "socially responsible"
personally, i believe that unless we accept that absolute value of critical thinking in our public education system, and stop sacrificing it to the hopes and dreams we have about our kiddies "future success", all dogma surrounding the nature of social responsibility is illusion....and a good argument can be made that neither of the major political parties address the direction of public education.....tho both have ideas about "fixing" it :lol:

I get your point, and I might call myself a "social libertarian," but I try to avoid "equivalency" in discussions. It's too much like kids saying, "but Bobby does it TOO!" Trying to deny everyone the right to view, read or hear whatever they want is not equivalent to regulating things like light bulbs that may (excess energy use) affect us all. Granted, other types of regulation may go too far, like the possibility of stopping citizens from eating food that some people consider "unhealthy." This is frequently done with "sin taxes" like they now have on tobacco products. It's one thing to stop people from causing you or me from having to breathe other people's smoke, but quite another to send me toward bankruptcy by way of enormous taxes on legal products, that I use in the privacy of my home.

-counter devil.

 

[JickyJuly]

If porn is so immoral and illegal, why are we asked to pay taxes? Are taxes paid by porn retailers, actors, camgirls etc. not worth anything? It's hypocritical and unintelligent to attack groups of people who pay taxes. They waste so much money and breath with this sort of thing. Back in 2006 when I was working at a porn store we got raided. They took all the videos and all the toys. 5 months of litigation later, they had to pay damages and we went back to selling everything. It was certainly money that the city could have used in a more productive way.

 

[AllisonWilder]

In an interview with The Huffington Post's Jen Bendery, Trueman said youth access to pornography amounted to "a major, major problem," and even caused males in their twenties to develop "porn-induced sexual dysfunction."

All this bullshit makes me rage. Young people finding porn shouldn't be the issue here. Where the fuck are the parents? If your kid is perusing internet porn sites for what would likely be extreme amounts of time, the internet isn't to blame, you are. Also, last I checked, men in their twenties aren't the youth anymore. They're fucking adults. If they can't get it up with a chick it's not because porn has ruined them, it's because they know what they want and it's likely not happening in the bedroom.

"I wanna make sure that every new computer sold in this country after I'm president has installed on it a filter to block all pornography and that parents can click that filter to make sure their kids don't see that kinda stuff coming in on their computer," Romney said at a campaign stop in Iowa in 2007.

Adding filters to computers will never work because kids are fucking smart. They practically come out of the womb these days with more technological-genius than I could hope to have in my left pinky. My son is almost two. He can work the remote, turn on my laptop, unlock my cell phone and somehow speed-dial his dad every time. I'm certain that by the time he's into porn, I'll have very little chance of figuring out how to stop him from seeing it and as long as he's not into kiddie porn or animals, I just don't care.

The people that want to pass these laws/vote for these laws are likely the same people that hop out of bed immediately after having missionary position sex and shower because they feel dirty.

 

[Nordling]

The people that actually pass the anti-porn laws don't really care--in fact they are probably the biggest purveyors of porn themselves. They pass such laws, or attempt to, as a way of pandering to the far-right, fundamentalists, whose votes they need to stay in office. This is why the economy is recovering so slowly. IMHO, the panderers care more about pornography, or stopping women from controlling their own bodies than working on one of the worst economies since the Great Depression.

 

[lordmagellan]

In an interview with The Huffington Post's Jen Bendery, Trueman said youth access to pornography amounted to "a major, major problem," and even caused males in their twenties to develop "porn-induced sexual dysfunction."

All this bullshit makes me rage. Young people finding porn shouldn't be the issue here. Where the fuck are the parents? If your kid is perusing internet porn sites for what would likely be extreme amounts of time, the internet isn't to blame, you are. Also, last I checked, men in their twenties aren't the youth anymore. They're fucking adults. If they can't get it up with a chick it's not because porn has ruined them, it's because they know what they want and it's likely not happening in the bedroom.

"I wanna make sure that every new computer sold in this country after I'm president has installed on it a filter to block all pornography and that parents can click that filter to make sure their kids don't see that kinda stuff coming in on their computer," Romney said at a campaign stop in Iowa in 2007.

Adding filters to computers will never work because kids are fucking smart. They practically come out of the womb these days with more technological-genius than I could hope to have in my left pinky. My son is almost two. He can work the remote, turn on my laptop, unlock my cell phone and somehow speed-dial his dad every time. I'm certain that by the time he's into porn, I'll have very little chance of figuring out how to stop him from seeing it and as long as he's not into kiddie porn or animals, I just don't care.

The people that want to pass these laws/vote for these laws are likely the same people that hop out of bed immediately after having missionary position sex and shower because they feel dirty.

Not to mention most electronics these days already have parental controls--- that the technologically literate kids teach their parents about. The only thing porn on the internet has done is taken the magazines out of dad's closet. Kids are way more resourceful than these jackasses give them credit for. I remember growing up with the advent of satellite tv, we would have to put in a code to unlock all the premium channels (yargh! pirates we be!) so when my mom went out on a Friday night and I wanted to watch some hot action I'd call up my grandpa for the code, as far as he knew I was watching the newest pay per view. (Actually, he probably knew what was up, dirty old man that he was.) I knew where the stash of magazines was, I knew where the video tapes were, because I found them. I eventually started figuring out the satellite code for myself. A young boy is a bloodhound for tits and ass- unless he's gay, then not so much with the tits. They always find a way. And contrary to the "damaging" argument put forth by conservatives and femi-nazis, I say it's a good thing. My wife wouldn't enjoy our sex life nearly as much if I hadn't spent my youth studying the art of fuckery. Has it warped my sense of good sex and what to expect of a woman? Let's see- any sex is good, so long as both (or all) parties are satisfied, and great sex is when the parties are beyond satisfied; and all I really expect of a woman is companionship and maybe a salad to go with my steak. (I cook, the wife handles salads.)
I don't know maybe porn has ruined me.

But this isn't a thing. There seems to be a current to anti-porn bullshit- it comes in waves, this is yet another crest, soon to be a lull. It always makes me think of the old "They came for my neighbors..." thing used to promote whatever war we're in- I think it was originally a Native American thing. In my head it ends with, "Then they came for my porn, and I went to jail for murder."

 

[bob]

In an interview with The Huffington Post's Jen Bendery, Trueman said youth access to pornography amounted to "a major, major problem," and even caused males in their twenties to develop "porn-induced sexual dysfunction."

All this bullshit makes me rage. Young people finding porn shouldn't be the issue here. Where the fuck are the parents?

to play the devil's advocate again, i'd like to suggest that those parents are as concerned for their kids as any other demographic, but they are confused but -like snow white- the forest that they don't know scares them....in part because they have never developed the skillset to pursue their own freedom and explore the boundaries beyond the rules they have been taught ......a right handed mommy government is just as dangerous as a left handed one......
:twocents-02cents:

 

[AllisonWilder]

So the rest of the country should just halt everything because some mommies are scared? No, I don't think so.

I'm sorry if some parents can't handle the fact that porn exists and could be tempting little Johnny or Suzie to do things that these parents find reprehensible, but sex is a natural thing. If these parents don't want their kids to see it, then they have to take measures within their homes to block it and educate their kids as to what they expect. A little education really goes a long way.

What bothers me the most here is that if porn is taken away, what goes next?

 

[camstory]

OK let me start by setting an extreme boundary on what in this country is Prolly left of left. I do not advocate sitting a toddler down to a vivid flick at lunch time or after nap time even. My main concern would be the social confusion he/she would likely feel when in a group environment for the first time in preschool or kindergarten. And no I don't think a child's introduction to the sexual human should be hard core porn. But I do think we do much more harm to our children's psychological identification to the sexual human by sheltering, hiding, sneaking, lying, restricting, and pretending the elephant isn't there well beyond the age of reasonable curiosity, than absolutely paying no attention at all. Or hey how bout we try to get over are millennia of backward thinking, dirty, nasty, hide it, guilt/religion polluted bullshit programing, and do what makes sense. Start the education of the sexual human at the same time was start all other education. Sex is taboo b/c we make it taboo. Sex has all the crap hung on it b/c we hang it there. I'm not saying you start a 6 year old with fisting 101, the same way you don't start a 6 year old out with trig. That doesn't mean we should not teach him/her numbers at an early age. The gut reaction will be to think it is a preposterous idea to start sex ed at 6, but when you're preparing to type out your argument against it, try to rid your self of all that bullshit programming, and more importantly imagine that everyone else has.

What's truly preposterous, is our discussions of sex and violence in the same breath. One is potentially harmful, because it's FUCKING VIOLENCE! The other is only as harmful as we make it. It really is ridicules that they continue to be compared. :twocents-02cents:

 

[Bocefish]

Still could use some work on that excessive blabber quotient CS.

Sex education should be done in the home and just in case the parents are total fails, kids should get the basics in school at an appropriate age. :twocents-02cents:

The holier than thous tried this shit with Larry Flint & Hustler mag too, ain't gonna happen.

 

[bob]

So the rest of the country should just halt everything because some mommies are scared? No, I don't think so.

don't ever confuse the attempt to understand something with acceptance of it....
we're in this dogmatic quicksand, imo, because we want what we want (some people think we have become spoiled and complacent in our success as the "home of the brave and land of the free").....and those things we want (whatever they are) should just be a natural outgrowth of that success....in an ideal world, two people SHOULD be able to want two different things, with both of them getting what they want....but that oftentimes doesn't even happen in a simple relationship between two people. let alone a nation of 300 million +

What bothers me the most here is that if porn is taken away, what goes next?

indeed....and what the argument will be to justify it.....the argument against porn is supported by a moral contract as the determinant of "social responsibility"....the contract suggests that human law and it's determinants of right and wrong came from a being wiser than we are....in effect, we're idiots, who need guidance....whether that's true or not is immaterial to me.....all that matters is that, as indivduals, we must learn right and wrong for ourselves by being open to experience, and the lessons they teach us....otherwise freedom is an illusion, defined by others.....and our species will stagnate, or worse.

sorry....i'm don't mean to sound like i'm going off on you, and i'm probably making to much of this in amber's forum...there's a lot of intelligent thoughtful folks here....i'm just venting about our need to see everything in some socially black and white context.

kinda liking libertarianism i guess :lol:

 

[AllisonWilder]

sorry....i'm don't mean to sound like i'm going off on you, and i'm probably making to much of this in amber's forum...there's a lot of intelligent thoughtful folks here....i'm just venting about our need to see everything in some socially black and white context.

kinda liking libertarianism i guess :lol:

I didn't see it like that . For someone who makes her living in the adult industry, the thought of it somehow just coming to a halt gets me a little heated.

 

[camstory]

Still could use some work on that excessive blabber quotient CS.

Sex education should be done in the home and just in case the parents are total fails, kids should get the basics in school at an appropriate age. :twocents-02cents:

The holier than thous tried this shit with Larry Flint & Hustler mag too, ain't gonna happen.

yes, ideally it would be done at home. Though you do understand how ridicules it is to think that currently, that could be accomplished with much profichancy from a practical pov, especially in the U.S., right? It's only a little less ridiculous than believing each child will be visited by the sex fairy the night before they are to become pubescent, and will have imparted unto them all needed knowledge of such things. :lol:

I could not agree more, that yes, as with anything else, if done as best it might be, it would be at the appropriate time/age.

As far as working on my condition that results in excessive blabber, (jabber being PC, but I'm fine with ether), I have accepted its incurable nature, and no longer work to fight an un-winnable battle. (See signature, found at the trailing edge of the blabber/jabber) I now instead, try to re-channel that energy and use it in my limited capacity to influence tiny things I hope might help to make the world a little better place. I know how foolish that sounds, and I mostly know that nothing I do makes any difference, but you might be surprised, many ppl are kind, and tell me sometimes, they think I make some difference. Yes, many ppl are kind.

I must say that I am quite impressed with your apparent acceptance of the condition inflicting yourself. I hesitate to mention it, but it is so obvious I think it can do no harm. It is not without reason that I bring it up, being the host to any zoonosis can not be easy, and one of an equine source, - well, I just can't imagine. I just wanted to publicly applaud your bravery, if it were I, I fear I would lock myself in and never come out, feeling much the same as I imagine a leper might, if I was ever to contract anything that made me appear so much the same as the after part of a draft animal. And you go along, chin up, chest out, as if you weren't even aware. Bravo. :thumbleft:

 

[camstory]

Still could use some work on that excessive blabber quotient CS.

Sex education should be done in the home and just in case the parents are total fails, kids should get the basics in school at an appropriate age. :twocents-02cents:

The holier than thous tried this shit with Larry Flint & Hustler mag too, ain't gonna happen.

yes, ideally it would be done at home. Though you do understand how ridicules it is to think that currently, that could be accomplished with much profichancy from a practical pov, especially in the U.S., right? It's only a little less ridiculous than believing each child will be visited by the sex fairy the night before they are to become pubescent, and will have imparted unto them all needed knowledge of such things. :lol:

I could not agree more, that yes, as with anything else, if done as best it might be, it would be at the appropriate time/age.

As far as working on my condition that results in excessive blabber, (jabber being PC, but I'm fine with ether), I have accepted its incurable nature, and no longer work to fight an un-winnable battle. (See signature, found at the trailing edge of the blabber/jabber) I now instead, try to re-channel that energy and use it in my limited capacity to influencem tiny things I hope might help to make the world a little better place. I know how foolish that sounds, and I mostly know that nothing I do makes any difference, but you might be surprised, many ppl are kind, and tell me sometimes, they think I make some difference. Yes, many ppl are kind.

I must say that I am quite impressed with your apparent acceptance of the condition inflicting yourself. I hesitate to mention it, but it is so obvious I think it can do no harm. It is not without reason that I bring it up, being the host to any zoonosis can not be easy, and one of an equine source, - well, I just can't imagine. I just wanted to publicly applaud your bravery, if it were I, I fear I would lock myself in and never come out, feeling much the same as I imagine a leper might, if I was ever to contract anything that made me appear so much the same as the after part of a draft animal. And you go along, chin up, chest out, as if you weren't even aware. Bravo. :thumbleft:

This condition of yours, being a horse's ass, i suppose is incurable. It is who you are, as much as my chronic blabber is who I am. If I am as maddening as you can be, I blame no one for their criticism. That is what this post is about. It may not be the most wonderful thing, but I appreciate most of the criticism I get here, and more important I understand it.

If criticism has a point other than being nasty & mean, I think it is to improve the product. To do so the producer of the product has to want to change it. If the criticism I receive feels like nothing other than just some horse's ass being mean, I'm not likely going to pay any attention to the criticism, but only feel the mean.

IMO. One of the stupidest things someone can say in such circumstances is, don't take it personally, they're like that with everyone. I don't care that they are critical of everyone, when it is me it feels personal. For that reason criticism should be given as kindly as possible if we wish it to have any impact beyond being nasty.

I don't think you meant to be mean just for mean's sake. But you sure the fuck weren't thinking anything about being kind, or not mean. Do I think everyone should always be nice and kind unless there is reason not to be? Yes, I do, but understand how unrealistic that is, and probably would not like it as much as I think I would anyway.

What I'm saying is, unless your only aim is to be a horse's ass, it is counter productive to not make some effort to be kind, or not mean and condescending when giving criticism.

 

[Anonymous]

This condition of yours, being a horse's ass, i suppose is incurable. It is who you are, as much as my chronic blabber is who I am. If I am as maddening as you can be, I blame no one for their criticism. That is what this post is about. It may not be the most wonderful thing, but I appreciate most of the criticism I get here, and more important I understand it.

You make mama proud...

 

[Bocefish]

Still could use some work on that excessive blabber quotient CS.

Sex education should be done in the home and just in case the parents are total fails, kids should get the basics in school at an appropriate age. :twocents-02cents:

The holier than thous tried this shit with Larry Flint & Hustler mag too, ain't gonna happen.

yes, ideally it would be done at home. Though you do understand how ridicules it is to think that currently, that could be accomplished with much profichancy from a practical pov, especially in the U.S., right? It's only a little less ridiculous than believing each child will be visited by the sex fairy the night before they are to become pubescent, and will have imparted unto them all needed knowledge of such things. :lol:

I could not agree more, that yes, as with anything else, if done as best it might be, it would be at the appropriate time/age.

As far as working on my condition that results in excessive blabber, (jabber being PC, but I'm fine with ether), I have accepted its incurable nature, and no longer work to fight an un-winnable battle. (See signature, found at the trailing edge of the blabber/jabber) I now instead, try to re-channel that energy and use it in my limited capacity to influencem tiny things I hope might help to make the world a little better place. I know how foolish that sounds, and I mostly know that nothing I do makes any difference, but you might be surprised, many ppl are kind, and tell me sometimes, they think I make some difference. Yes, many ppl are kind.

I must say that I am quite impressed with your apparent acceptance of the condition inflicting yourself. I hesitate to mention it, but it is so obvious I think it can do no harm. It is not without reason that I bring it up, being the host to any zoonosis can not be easy, and one of an equine source, - well, I just can't imagine. I just wanted to publicly applaud your bravery, if it were I, I fear I would lock myself in and never come out, feeling much the same as I imagine a leper might, if I was ever to contract anything that made me appear so much the same as the after part of a draft animal. And you go along, chin up, chest out, as if you weren't even aware. Bravo. :thumbleft:

This condition of yours, being a horse's ass, i suppose is incurable. It is who you are, as much as my chronic blabber is who I am. If I am as maddening as you can be, I blame no one for their criticism. That is what this post is about. It may not be the most wonderful thing, but I appreciate most of the criticism I get here, and more important I understand it.

If criticism has a point other than being nasty & mean, I think it is to improve the product. To do so the producer of the product has to want to change it. If the criticism I receive feels like nothing other than just some horse's ass being mean, I'm not likely going to pay any attention to the criticism, but only feel the mean.

IMO. One of the stupidest things someone can say in such circumstances is, don't take it personally, they're like that with everyone. I don't care that they are critical of everyone, when it is me it feels personal. For that reason criticism should be given as kindly as possible if we wish it to have any impact beyond being nasty.

I don't think you meant to be mean just for mean's sake. But you sure the fuck weren't thinking anything about being kind, or not mean. Do I think everyone should always be nice and kind unless there is reason not to be? Yes, I do, but understand how unrealistic that is, and probably would not like it as much as I think I would anyway.

What I'm saying is, unless your only aim is to be a horse's ass, it is counter productive to not make some effort to be kind, or not mean and condescending when giving criticism.

Quoting yourself to get the attention I didn't bother to give you the first time just shows how pathetically desperate you are for attention. I've been insulted way worse by way better people than you. Along with your excessive drivel that rarely makes sense, you also need to work on your, how did you say it, "profichancy." Was I supposed to be hurt by your laughable insult?

If you get all butt hurt over a little criticism, then you should probably get off adult internet forums like this and go find a grade school forum where everyone coats what they say with sugar spice.

 

[camstory]

I am disregarding your last post. In fact I have not even read it, choosing to click the post reply button just above the OP and post this first. I think it is likely something I will not like. That I could handle, but my concern was that I would not like it so much that I would feel an apology to horses would be in line. I thought better I do this first.

I had started my last post with the intention of apologizing for inferring you were a horse's ass in the first place. In fact the first word, "This" in my last post was the first word of the thought, "this ^^^^^^^ was a bit harsh, and unnecessary", the problem with that is when it came time to type the ^^^^^^ I could not find "^" on the stupid touchscreen keyboard of the notepad I was using at the time. The whole reason I quoted myself was so I could point to it with ^^^^^^ this^, saying, "This ^^^^^^ was a bit harsh... when I could not find ' ^ ', "This", stayed on the page and became the first word of one of the thoughts I had wanted to make in the apology. That being that it is counter productive to do anything while criticizing a person that takes their focus off the criticism, whatever that anything is, if you wish for your criticism to have the effect of changing the critizizeds behavior or product. It was late and I was tired and frustrated with the stupid keyboard and other things. I got stuck on the secondary thought and never got to the apology. I am sorry for inferring you were a horses ass and then calling you one.

Now once more it is late and I am tired, I think I will wait till tomorrow to read your post b/c I don't want to have to post another apology tonight. Whether it be to you b/c there was something I overlooked or misinterpreted in the blabber post, or to the horses b/c you did not have the insight to suppose my last two post were out of character for me and posted something extra pissy. I hope nether is true and we can both spend our time doing something more pleasant.

 

[Bocefish]

I am disregarding your last post. In fact I have not even read it, choosing to click the post reply button just above the OP and post this first. I think it is likely something I will not like. That I could handle, but my concern was that I would not like it so much that I would feel an apology to horses would be in line. I thought better I do this first.

I had started my last post with the intention of apologizing for inferring you were a horse's ass in the first place. In fact the first word, "This" in my last post was the first word of the thought, "this ^^^^^^^ was a bit harsh, and unnecessary", the problem with that is when it came time to type the ^^^^^^ I could not find "^" on the stupid touchscreen keyboard of the notepad I was using at the time. The whole reason I quoted myself was so I could point to it with ^^^^^^ this^, saying, "This ^^^^^^ was a bit harsh... when I could not find ' ^ ', "This", stayed on the page and became the first word of one of the thoughts I had wanted to make in the apology. That being that it is counter productive to do anything while criticizing a person that takes their focus off the criticism, whatever that anything is, if you wish for your criticism to have the effect of changing the critizizeds behavior or product. It was late and I was tired and frustrated with the stupid keyboard and other things. I got stuck on the secondary thought and never got to the apology. I am sorry for inferring you were a horses ass and then calling you one.

Now once more it is late and I am tired, I think I will wait till tomorrow to read your post b/c I don't want to have to post another apology tonight. Whether it be to you b/c there was something I overlooked or misinterpreted in the blabber post, or to the horses b/c you did not have the insight to suppose my last two post were out of character for me and posted something extra pissy. I hope nether is true and we can both spend our time doing something more pleasant.

Don't bother replying because I won't read it anyway, not worth my time.

 

[Nordling]

:violin:

 

[lordmagellan]

Ladies, can we kindly get back to being pissed off about political assaults on porno?

 

[Bocefish]

Who's stopping ya? If you have so much to say, let's hear it.

 

[camstory]

I am disregarding your last post. In fact I have not even read it, choosing to click the post reply button just above the OP and post this first. I think it is likely something I will not like. That I could handle, but my concern was that I would not like it so much that I would feel an apology to horses would be in line. I thought better I do this first.

I had started my last post with the intention of apologizing for inferring you were a horse's ass in the first place. In fact the first word, "This" in my last post was the first word of the thought, "this ^^^^^^^ was a bit harsh, and unnecessary", the problem with that is when it came time to type the ^^^^^^ I could not find "^" on the stupid touchscreen keyboard of the notepad I was using at the time. The whole reason I quoted myself was so I could point to it with ^^^^^^ this^, saying, "This ^^^^^^ was a bit harsh... when I could not find ' ^ ', "This", stayed on the page and became the first word of one of the thoughts I had wanted to make in the apology. That being that it is counter productive to do anything while criticizing a person that takes their focus off the criticism, whatever that anything is, if you wish for your criticism to have the effect of changing the critizizeds behavior or product. It was late and I was tired and frustrated with the stupid keyboard and other things. I got stuck on the secondary thought and never got to the apology. I am sorry for inferring you were a horses ass and then calling you one.

Now once more it is late and I am tired, I think I will wait till tomorrow to read your post b/c I don't want to have to post another apology tonight. Whether it be to you b/c there was something I overlooked or misinterpreted in the blabber post, or to the horses b/c you did not have the insight to suppose my last two post were out of character for me and posted something extra pissy. I hope nether is true and we can both spend our time doing something more pleasant.

Don't bother replying because I won't read it anyway, not worth my time.

Replying to it would have been less changeling than posting to the word thread, so cool, works for me. :hello2:

 

[camstory]

Ladies, can we kindly get back to being pissed off about political assaults on porno?

Cool, better yet. (Oh, but if I were a lady, I don't think I would be here so much, but out getting all the attention I desperatly need. :lol