Question about our over Seas models and there Studios

[badassboy]

I have a few Model friends from Ukraine and other parts of Russia who i have asked them , Why dont you have MFC Share or Twitter or any forms of advertising or communicating outside of MFC. I know they work from studios and have a Boss from what i understand , But not sure why MFC would not let them use Twitter or any other source to increase fan base etc ? Also some cant even split cam or allowed to Skype , Can anyone help with this question they simply told me its against the rules and there Boss will not allow it !

 

[SaffronBurke]

Studio rules are studio rules. Don't push girls to break them.

 

[badassboy]

Studio rules are studio rules. Don't push girls to break them.

didnt ask them to break them , simply asked why , doesnt make any sense to me

 

[SaffronBurke]

didnt ask them to break them , simply asked why , doesnt make any sense to me

Because the studio said so. Probably gives them less work to do.

 

[badassboy]

Because the studio said so. Probably gives them less work to do.

Ok once again Studios are run by independent operators, and not MFC . Iam clearly stating that its seems dumb as fuck models our restricted and limited to increasing income for them and operators, Some studios take 50 % of there earnings , granted the model uses the studios stuff but fucked up to me there not allowed to atleast have potential to make more cash. Some of these studios our nothing but slum lords . Not sure why MFC doesnt have the same rules that should be applied to operators

 

[SaffronBurke]

Studios are run by independent operators, and not MFC

Yeah, that's the point. Studios often have stricter rules than the actual sites.

 

[AmberCutie]

But not sure why MFC would not let them use Twitter or any other source

Not sure why MFC doesnt have the same rules that should be applied to operators

It isn't MFC that's limiting accounts, it's the studios choice not to run extra stuff for the models.

 

[AudriTwo]

They won't let them have Twitter? Those monsters.


/S

 

[JoleneBrody]

It isn't MFC that's limiting accounts, it's the studios choice not to run extra stuff for the models.

Aye! And the “why” most likely on things like twitter/snap/skype... is to avoid a model collecting funds outside of her studio account that they are not able to collect their percentage of.

 

[SaffronBurke]

they simply told me its against the rules and there Boss will not allow it !

I still don't understand why you need more of an answer than this. This is the answer. This is why.

 

[ShinyFork]

Ok once again Studios are run by independent operators, and not MFC . Iam clearly stating that its seems dumb as fuck models our restricted and limited to increasing income for them and operators, Some studios take 50 % of there earnings , granted the model uses the studios stuff but fucked up to me there not allowed to atleast have potential to make more cash. Some of these studios our nothing but slum lords . Not sure why MFC doesnt have the same rules that should be applied to operators

You make a lot of complaints about the way things are ran throughout the industry. Maybe you should start your own cam room. I'm not saying this in a bitchy way; I sincerely think you should make a model account and run things as you see fit. I think it will give you more enjoyment. It seems like your focus is on cam management more than cam enjoyment so maybe you belong on the other side of the camera.

 

[Sansa]

There are many reasons why a studio wouldn't allow things like Skype, Twitter, Snapchat

-They don't get a cut of the earnings, this is the biggest thing

-On MFC, a ton of people who want Skype want it cheap. The vast majority want to pay rates that are ridiculously low, and many don't even want to pay with tokens, they want to pay with paypal (which does not allow transactions for sex work) or things like amazon giftcards which are totally useless to anyone trying to pay their bills. Why would a studio want to deal with this hassle? Why would they want to have a model log out, waste time getting things set up for Skype, only for a $20 giftcard? The cost per minute of a private makes it worth it for models, and privates also boost camscore. Skype does no such thing and the studios are more than well aware of this.

-Twitter, it can be a huge time sink. I personally do not understand why someone would spend several hours a day on twitter when that time could be put to better use, like camming directly. I say this from personal experience, my earnings went up when I quit Twitter (I had over 4000 followers) and focused more on putting those hours into actual camming. A studio would also realize this of their models, and encourage more time online than offline. Of course forbidding Twitter does give control over their models better and how they receive income, and again ensure that they can receive their cut of whatever potential earnings a model would receive, but there are practical reasons too. It entices a member to visit the cam site itself to interact with the model if he likes her, having outlets on Twitter does the exact opposite.

-MFCShare - I have no idea why a studio wouldn't allow this since all of the income would still be exclusively on MFC.

 

[SpookybunzSM]

Yeah I don't think most studios are run with the idea of making the model the most possible money.
The studios are run to make the studios the most possible money.
Letting their performers have contact with clients in ways that aren't monitored (and profited off of) by the studio, are obviously going to be huge no-nos for them.
Obviously the worst fear of a studio, is for a model to garner a personal clientele and then leaving the studio (and taking her clients and their money with her).

@Sansa hit the nail on the head with the Skype and twitter shows though.
Dips in camscore mean the models earnings will take a hit, too.
Studios have no use for offsite payment, and why would they let their models accept less money for the same show they could provide in a private at 60 tokens per minute on MFC?
And if the studio ran twitter accounts for their girls, it would be a whole lot of tracking people down for pictures/content to update, and endless hours doing grunt work, with little return (since most social media platforms banned porn/18+ content, most performers are perpetually shadow banned anyways).

That's just a studio, c'est la vie.

 

[AmberCutie]

Letting their performers have contact with clients in ways that aren't monitored (and profited off of) by the studio, are obviously going to be huge no-nos for them.
Obviously the worst fear of a studio, is for a model to garner a personal clientele and then leaving the studio (and taking her clients and their money with her)

Exactly. I think likely @badassboy doesn’t quite understand how studios work or their purpose. Maybe this thread will shed some insight.

 

[Lelo1]

If they leave the studio, the studio has their cam name. They have to start over on the platform.
They don't have domination over Twitter, Skype, Extra.

 

[badassboy]

You make a lot of complaints about the way things are ran throughout the industry. Maybe you should start your own cam room. I'm not saying this in a bitchy way; I sincerely think you should make a model account and run things as you see fit. I think it will give you more enjoyment. It seems like your focus is on cam management more than cam enjoyment so maybe you belong on the other side of the camera.

 

[badassboy]

I still don't understand why you need more of an answer than this. This is the answer. This is why.

Because at the time of the post , i didnt not know they were independently ran, I was getting feedback as this post was running , and had time to research it a bit more. ty for the reply

 

[badassboy]

You make a lot of complaints about the way things are ran throughout the industry. Maybe you should start your own cam room. I'm not saying this in a bitchy way; I sincerely think you should make a model account and run things as you see fit. I think it will give you more enjoyment. It seems like your focus is on cam management more than cam enjoyment so maybe you belong on the other side of the camera.

 

[badassboy]

Because at the time of the post , i didnt not know they were independently ran, I was getting feedback as this post was running , and had time to research it a bit more. ty for the reply

You make a lot of complaints about the way things are ran throughout the industry. Maybe you should start your own cam room. I'm not saying this in a bitchy way; I sincerely think you should make a model account and run things as you see fit. I think it will give you more enjoyment. It seems like your focus is on cam management more than cam enjoyment so maybe you belong on the other side of the camera.

If its sounds like iam complaining iam, At the time of the post i did not fully understand studios, and assumed they were ran by MFC , As time went on i was educated . Not sure how becoming a model is going to enlighten me ? I already know you all have a stressful job and some make it others cant do it. I thought it was a good complaint at the time because iam looking out for the Models . As i still get feedback from other models from Columbia and other areas, They tell me if they make 2000 tokens a day and keep there cam score up they can get more of a percentage. Does it irritate me that these models struggle in life and in Countries like Ukraine and jobs are very little and women flock to these trades to make money , YES . If you read my other post Iam all for the model and wish they all were successful . sorry wear my heart on my sleeve.

 

[badassboy]

Exactly. I think likely @badassboy doesn’t quite understand how studios work or their purpose. Maybe this thread will shed some insight.

Thank You Amber, I hope my post did not seem like an attack on models as one model seemed to think, But as i told a few others i was learning as this post went on, and had time to research it myself, and got more knowledge on it . Your Awesome thank you again