This guy deserves all the bans.

[Fatquack]

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=2&i=208189&t=208189

Asking how he can download his MFC privates so he can "share" them. I don't know if he uses the same username on MFC, but if he does, go ahead and burn him to the ground.

 

[justjoinedtopost]

Idk. Maybe is him, maybe not.

http://profiles.myfreecams.com/padzer1

 

[Magnolia]

Reply saying something along the lines with "you can't."

Give a bullshit reason if you have to. He sounds too dumb to figure it out himself anyways.

Also it appears he has the same name on MFC: padzer1

 

[Phoenix4987]

Did...you....just snitch on a forum member....of another forum..? About...something as basic as this?

 

[ExcellaExe]

Thanks for bringing this to models attention, Fatquack. Just lifetime banned him, even though we've never interacted I'm not taking that risk.

 

[AudriTwo]

What weirdo shares porn? Get a better hobby.

 

[SaiyaJordan]

Ugh. This is why I dont like any site should allow members to view prior shows they do with models. Yes, there are members who don't do that if it's their favorite model and vice versa, with complete trust.

 

[dark_mermaid]

The private show archive and that it cannot be turned off by the model like on cb (and 9 out 10 turn it off) is one of the biggest selling points for private shows at mfc. They'll never turn it off, just like the dubious token transfer function that complements the show recordings perfectly. Models at mfc just have to accept that shows are recorded and sold among users.

 

[jinx juggs]

I stopped doing private because of this. Well not so much because they can share it, but because its not worth it. They get a live show and practically a custom video and usually leave after a couple of minutes. And of course they get mad if I try to slow it down. Not worth the hassle for me, or maybe I just get jerks lol

 

[Mikey_P]

I wonder how common is revenge sharing?

 

[AudriTwo]

I wonder how common is revenge sharing?

Too common.

 

[dark_mermaid]

What is revenge sharing? Revenge for what?

 

[DFT]

"Revenge sharing"

I like the term since it folds into revenge porn laws being enacted.

Do you think posting a recording of a private should fall under the same coverage? Should a public show? Is it about intent? I don't have a concrete position what should be revenge vs copyright, curious what you think. Since these new era of laws are being made on the research of staffers who search the internet for clues how to write up a bill for their Congress critter to endorse your comment could influence law.

Whatever the case, those who record and upload are asswipes.

 

[dilligaf0]

"Revenge sharing"

I like the term since it folds into revenge porn laws being enacted.

Do you think posting a recording of a private should fall under the same coverage? Should a public show? Is it about intent? I don't have a concrete position what should be revenge vs copyright, curious what you think. Since these new era of laws are being made on the research of staffers who search the internet for clues how to write up a bill for their Congress critter to endorse your comment could influence law.

Whatever the case, those who record and upload are asswipes.

If the intent is to harm the model emotionally, or to make her real identity public, is what I would call "revenge sharing".

 

[AudriTwo]

What is revenge sharing? Revenge for what?

Kinda like this:
"I have to buy your content to see your pussy? I will buy ALL of it then I will share it with the world because I hate you and I really showed you, dumb camwhore!"

or

"She banned me because I kept trying to push her to do things she wasn't comfortable with so in return I'm going to upload her content to tube sites. Should of done that quadruple penetration I so desperately wanted."

 

[JoleneBrody]

I imagine the majority of people who share bought content aren't seeking any revenge, just approval from their "bros"

 

[justjoinedtopost]

"Revenge sharing"

I like the term since it folds into revenge porn laws being enacted.

Do you think posting a recording of a private should fall under the same coverage? Should a public show? Is it about intent? I don't have a concrete position what should be revenge vs copyright, curious what you think. Since these new era of laws are being made on the research of staffers who search the internet for clues how to write up a bill for their Congress critter to endorse your comment could influence law.

Whatever the case, those who record and upload are asswipes.

With that in mind...

How much more power? How much more authority? How many more regulations? How many more Bureaus/Administrations/Departments?

How much further until we are all 100%, well and truly protected?