Re: Would a model be interested in also selling amateur vide
Uhm, well, nothing I can say - yes. But it's definitely not viewed as a ponzi scheme anymore (maybe a year ago). Even Bitcoin skeptics, like Paul Krugman, who is a Keynesian economist and despises deflation, don't say that Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme. He just thinks economy cannot run on Bitcoin because poor people are gonna be out of jobs and will starve to death, etc. But that's an entirely different matter with which I disagree, because I'm not a Keynesian. Anyway, look at what the business people are saying (Bitcoin's been on Bloomberg for quite a while now): it's a risky investment but a one to be considered. Keep in mind they don't quite understand the technology behind it. If they did, they would be much more accepting.
My point is this: you can't just go out and call Bitcoin a ponzi scheme because you don't understand it and it's not yet widely accepted. You have to argue and prove.
schlmoe said:jasonp said:That's precisely why Bitcoin is more valuable than gold.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Dude, I realize you are a bitcoin proponent...but c'mon.
Currently, it is viewed more as a Ponzi scheme, than a Buffett-type investment (or currency) Nothing you say can change that fact. Maybe in the future, it may change, but it will be a while before that change occurs. Good luck, though.
Uhm, well, nothing I can say - yes. But it's definitely not viewed as a ponzi scheme anymore (maybe a year ago). Even Bitcoin skeptics, like Paul Krugman, who is a Keynesian economist and despises deflation, don't say that Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme. He just thinks economy cannot run on Bitcoin because poor people are gonna be out of jobs and will starve to death, etc. But that's an entirely different matter with which I disagree, because I'm not a Keynesian. Anyway, look at what the business people are saying (Bitcoin's been on Bloomberg for quite a while now): it's a risky investment but a one to be considered. Keep in mind they don't quite understand the technology behind it. If they did, they would be much more accepting.
My point is this: you can't just go out and call Bitcoin a ponzi scheme because you don't understand it and it's not yet widely accepted. You have to argue and prove.