jebbaz said:Some of these girls may not even be of age in these ad's. I spot them all over the place, and they all link right to mfc. Just a curiosity of mine.... anyone else noticed this or have an opinion?
jebbaz said:Found them on 4chan, and several porn sites.
JoleneJolene said:And by the way...
With so many hot broads on MFC why would they pimp out the photo shoots for their adds to non-MFC models???
This is the link:LilyPink said:Perhaps it isn't MFC and it's a premium using their BAF link?
http://www.myfreecams.com/?cam=30336&track=4chan300
AlexLady said:How do we know they weren't models sometime in the past? The site has been around for a long time.
pyrite1965 said:AlexLady said:How do we know they weren't models sometime in the past? The site has been around for a long time.
They look like pictures from someone's /b/ folder, I think I've seen some of them on /b/ even...
LadyLuna said:How exactly does that rule out them being former models? Or early-years pics of current models?
bawksy said:LadyLuna said:How exactly does that rule out them being former models? Or early-years pics of current models?
The set that the pic in Jebbaz's first post is from is quite popular in amateur porn circles, including /b/. I've seen like 30 threads on that set. If she was a model somewhere, or if there was any additional imagery of her whatsoever, you can be damn sure /b/ would know about it. And it doesn't.
When there is the parameter "cam" instead of "baf" it means that it is someone or some site that MFC approved/invited to be partner, affiliate or whatever. I really don't know how to call them because MFC does not have an affiliate program. I think they are paid with money, not tokens. And I have no idea how much they earn per member.Sevrin said:Code:http://www.myfreecams.com/?cam=30336&track=4chan300