Funny penis thread

[bawksy]

For penises found on cam sites OTHER than MFC, where dudes are actually allowed on cam.

I'll start.

 

[BlueViolet]

I'm curious as to why you are looking at penises on other camsites.

 

[mynameisbob84]

Man, I KNEW I misplaced my thumb...

 

[Jupiter551]

:lol: I'm assuming this is to get them out of the MoC thread.

Should have called it "Penises that make you go 'WTF'"

 

[Evvie]

:lol: I'm assuming this is to get them out of the MoC thread.

Should have called it "Penises that make you go 'WTF'"

That penis in there does indeed make me go WTF. Circumcision ftw?

Edit to add: My dearest Bawksy, would you be so kind as to share your favorite live male pornography sites? I know of few.

 

[RedHerby1]

to the models who are making fun in this thread:

don't bite the penis that feeds you !

ok, if you do it softly then it's ok :lol:

 

[SNATCH]

That penis in there does indeed make me go WTF. Circumcision ftw?

HAHAHA. It really does. Pinocchio glory hole FTFW? I personally prefer UNcircumcised... JUST NOT THAT ONE ^.

 

[bawksy]

My dearest Bawksy, would you be so kind as to share your favorite live male pornography sites? I know of few.

Despite being a fag, I'm not actually a homo, I don't visit sites specifically to watch dudes. But two of the cam sites I frequent are mixed-gender: CamFuze and Chaturbate. Of those, Chaturbate is easily the better website.

CamFuze also has traps, if you're into that.

 

[BlueViolet]

HAHAHA. It really does. Pinocchio glory hole FTFW? I personally prefer UNcircumcised... JUST NOT THAT ONE ^.

Agreed.

CamFuze also has traps, if you're into that.

I'm into that.

 

[SNATCH]

HAHAHA. It really does. Pinocchio glory hole FTFW? I personally prefer UNcircumcised... JUST NOT THAT ONE ^.

Agreed.

SWEET. I'm not insane!! LOL. I never hear anyone say they like them uncut... So people always get weird about it with me. Idiots. It's not like I said I like Smurf dicks or something... But yeah. That dudes dick looks... Gross. I'm picky about penises.

 

[Anonymous]

HAHAHA. It really does. Pinocchio glory hole FTFW? I personally prefer UNcircumcised... JUST NOT THAT ONE ^.

Agreed.

SWEET. I'm not insane!! LOL. I never hear anyone say they like them uncut... So people always get weird about it with me. Idiots. It's not like I said I like Smurf dicks or something... But yeah. That dudes dick looks... Gross. I'm picky about penises.

Is it penises or peni? Cactus -> cacti

 

[BlueViolet]

HAHAHA. It really does. Pinocchio glory hole FTFW? I personally prefer UNcircumcised... JUST NOT THAT ONE ^.

Agreed.

SWEET. I'm not insane!! LOL. I never hear anyone say they like them uncut... So people always get weird about it with me. Idiots. It's not like I said I like Smurf dicks or something... But yeah. That dudes dick looks... Gross. I'm picky about penises.

Yeah, that dude's penis looks pretty awkward, but I like them being uncut. It's natural. I think the concept of circumcision is kind of weird and gross and freaks me out really badly. Not that I don't like the way circumcised penises (peni? lol) look, but nothing wrong with uncut, thank you. But yeah, you are probably the only person I've met who agrees with me on that logic as well with liking uncut penises.

 

[hornygods]

Semantics/Linguistics -

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/rea ... l-of-penis

In this case, your first instinct is a good one. The English-style plural is usually acceptable and often preferred. When you don't know what the Latin plural is and don't have a dictionary handy, you should choose the English-style plural rather than try to guess. (Sometimes even dictionaries will steer you wrong; see below). In your example, penises is a perfectly good plural of penis in English. Many people who deal with penises professionally use the Latin-style plural penes instead. That's fine too, but even among urologists, penises seem to predominate. Seems, rather. "Penises" seems to predominate.

Which, of course, reads as gobbledygook. It basically says, in layman's terms, that 'penises' or 'penes' is considered the proper plural. If it were to be read as peni, the word must be penus (like cactus-cacti), thus - to call penises 'peni' would be using pseudo-Latin.

On a more relevant note - I don't look at penises enough to take screenshots and post, but I'll try my best to find any interesting ones. They aren't very interesting in general, so it might take a while...

 

[SNATCH]

I'd like to say I'd post pics... But this isn't the "Penises that I find not attractive thread" && even if it was, I feel that'd be kinda rude.... I look at enough weird/not attractive/funny dicks all day... Most of the time I try to get them out of my head, lol.

However... As far as the circumcision goes... I feel bad for cut guys. They'll never know the joy of being uncut. The benefits, the sensitivity, the pleasure that comes from simply being uncut. Watching an uncut guy touch his penis, compared to a cut guy - totally different.

 

[BlueViolet]

However... As far as the circumcision goes... I feel bad for cut guys. They'll never know the joy of being uncut. The benefits, the sensitivity, the pleasure that comes from simply being uncut. Watching an uncut guy touch his penis, compared to a cut guy - totally different.

Exactly my logic. Anytime I ever mention my views on this, though, I get attacked by pretty much every girl and even the vast majority of guys. I just think the act of circumcision is barbaric and gross. Especially when done on an infant... "But they can't remember it!" So? It still hurts them and I just couldn't comprehend hurting a baby. Then it hurts badly for them to urinate in their diaper until it heals. I could never put my baby through that. It's so unnecessary.

"But it looks gross/weird if it's not!" That's because most girls are used to what cut looks like, uncut it natural and just fine to me, thank you. The idea of beauty is ever changing as well, back in the middle ages only women with super tiny breasts and huge waists were attractive.

"But they don't have any stamina during sex!" I've slept with someone who was uncut, and he had plenty of stamina.

"But it's easier to clean and helps prevent diseases!" Any guy I've met who had it uncut has never complained about it being "too hard" to clean and if they are sleeping with someone they aren't sure is STD free, they should be using a condom anyway. Just my :twocents-02cents: .

 

[abbeyrhode]

My dearest Bawksy, would you be so kind as to share your favorite live male pornography sites? I know of few.

Despite being a fag, I'm not actually a homo, I don't visit sites specifically to watch dudes. But two of the cam sites I frequent are mixed-gender: CamFuze and Chaturbate. Of those, Chaturbate is easily the better website.

CamFuze also has traps, if you're into that.

I like their topic. We fuck like porn stars. :lol:

 

[Just_mark__]

However... As far as the circumcision goes... I feel bad for cut guys. They'll never know the joy of being uncut. The benefits, the sensitivity, the pleasure that comes from simply being uncut. Watching an uncut guy touch his penis, compared to a cut guy - totally different.

Exactly my logic. Anytime I ever mention my views on this, though, I get attacked by pretty much every girl and even the vast majority of guys. I just think the act of circumcision is barbaric and gross. Especially when done on an infant... "But they can't remember it!" So? It still hurts them and I just couldn't comprehend hurting a baby. Then it hurts badly for them to urinate in their diaper until it heals. I could never put my baby through that. It's so unnecessary.

"But it looks gross/weird if it's not!" That's because most girls are used to what cut looks like, uncut it natural and just fine to me, thank you. The idea of beauty is ever changing as well, back in the middle ages only women with super tiny breasts and huge waists were attractive.

"But they don't have any stamina during sex!" I've slept with someone who was uncut, and he had plenty of stamina.

"But it's easier to clean and helps prevent diseases!" Any guy I've met who had it uncut has never complained about it being "too hard" to clean and if they are sleeping with someone they aren't sure is STD free, they should be using a condom anyway. Just my :twocents-02cents: .

Most girls in the US maybe, I couldn't say because I haven't shown most of them my dick. I'm getting round to it though.
Outside the US uncut is the norm cept for wierdo religulous folks ofc.

 

[Jupiter551]

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? Cut guys cum faster or something?

 

[prettyman]

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? Cut guys cum faster or something?

well I think it's mostly an urban legend about cut guys beeing less sensitive and cumming not so fast as uncut guys.
it's all a "game" of experience, psycology and the ability to use the pbc(don't know the exact definition) muscle.

 

[Jupiter551]

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? Cut guys cum faster or something?

well I think it's mostly an urban legend about cut guys beeing less sensitive and cumming not so fast as uncut guys.
it's all a "game" of experience, psycology and the ability to use the pbc(don't know the exact definition) muscle.

Yeah I suspect too that it's an urban legend because I can't see a reasonable size control group of adults willing to get circumsized for science

 

[Bocefish]

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? Cut guys cum faster or something?

well I think it's mostly an urban legend about cut guys beeing less sensitive and cumming not so fast as uncut guys.
it's all a "game" of experience, psycology and the ability to use the pbc(don't know the exact definition) muscle.

Yeah I suspect too that it's an urban legend because I can't see a reasonable size control group of adults willing to get circumsized for science

I've read that adult males who got cut regret it because they lost sensation...

http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html#men

AlterNet
April 15, 2008
Uncut is better I have proof

by ashkewoof
Uncut by birth, got cut at 18 because I was confused that cut penises looked better.
I have tried to live without regret and I swore when I got circumcised, I would never regret it.
I now live with that regret. I am reminded of this regret every time I am intimate with a partner.
With my foreskin went a wonderful degree of sensuality and sensitivity that I will never get back and never knew I would miss until it was gone. I had a whole lot of experience with a foreskin before I was cut and a whole lot of experience without one after I was cut.
I am in a very good position to speak on the subject clearly since I have experienced both sides of the issue for long periods of time.
I want to scream when I hear parents making the choice to mutilate their child for cleanliness, aesthetics or misplaced notions of health. With a few necessary medical exceptions, this is barbarity and it is mutilating your son in the most intimate of ways.
My penis was always clean, happy and wonderful. Now part of it, a truly wonderful part of it is gone and restoration will not bring it back.
Stop butchering your children and STOP making this choice for them!
It should be illegal to do this to children. If they want to do so later on their journey through this life, when they are adults for whatever reason, religious or otherwise, let them. No one should mutilate children at an age especially when they can not consent to it.

RE: Uncut is better I have proof
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney on Apr 15, 2008 8:47 AM
I totally, agree with you. I too, have been on both sides of this issue having my "child-hood operation" at the age of 24 or 25 yrs. old. It was done for medical reasons and had nothing to do with any of the other reasons associated with having it done. One does lose a lot of sensitivity removing the foreskin. It offers many functions from protection of the glans to lubrication of it. When the glans is continually, exposed to the elements, it loses sensitivity. I think all reasons for removing it save, medically, are not worth mutilating a functioning piece of anatomy.

 

[Nordling]

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? Cut guys cum faster or something?

well I think it's mostly an urban legend about cut guys beeing less sensitive and cumming not so fast as uncut guys.
it's all a "game" of experience, psycology and the ability to use the pbc(don't know the exact definition) muscle.

Yeah I suspect too that it's an urban legend because I can't see a reasonable size control group of adults willing to get circumsized for science

They could limit the study to men who get the surgery after becoming adults, so I think "urban legend" may be an exaggeration. The logic is that the foreskin harbors about a bajillion nerve endings, but who knows? Maybe those nerves that remain become more sensitive--and they'd have to, since after the operation, the skin becomes thicker. Such a study, in any case, would be difficult for one reason--few guys are going to admit to being "diminished erotically" no matter what has happened to them under the knife.

We do know one thing. Most men seem to do okay under either condition.

 

[Bocefish]

Hmmm... I think Nordling either has me on iggy or didn't see my previous post. Like I said in another related thread, I have no regrets because you can't miss something you've never felt before.

 

[Jupiter551]

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? uncut guys cum faster or something?

well I think it's mostly an urban legend about cut guys beeing less sensitive and cumming not so fast as uncut guys.
it's all a "game" of experience, psycology and the ability to use the pbc(don't know the exact definition) muscle.

Yeah I suspect too that it's an urban legend because I can't see a reasonable size control group of adults willing to get circumsized for science

I've read that adult males who got cut regret it because they lost sensation...

http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html#men

AlterNet
April 15, 2008
Uncut is better I have proof

by ashkewoof
Uncut by birth, got cut at 18 because I was confused that cut penises looked better.
I have tried to live without regret and I swore when I got circumcised, I would never regret it.
I now live with that regret. I am reminded of this regret every time I am intimate with a partner.
With my foreskin went a wonderful degree of sensuality and sensitivity that I will never get back and never knew I would miss until it was gone. I had a whole lot of experience with a foreskin before I was cut and a whole lot of experience without one after I was cut.
I am in a very good position to speak on the subject clearly since I have experienced both sides of the issue for long periods of time.
I want to scream when I hear parents making the choice to mutilate their child for cleanliness, aesthetics or misplaced notions of health. With a few necessary medical exceptions, this is barbarity and it is mutilating your son in the most intimate of ways.
My penis was always clean, happy and wonderful. Now part of it, a truly wonderful part of it is gone and restoration will not bring it back.
Stop butchering your children and STOP making this choice for them!
It should be illegal to do this to children. If they want to do so later on their journey through this life, when they are adults for whatever reason, religious or otherwise, let them. No one should mutilate children at an age especially when they can not consent to it.

RE: Uncut is better I have proof
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney on Apr 15, 2008 8:47 AM
I totally, agree with you. I too, have been on both sides of this issue having my "child-hood operation" at the age of 24 or 25 yrs. old. It was done for medical reasons and had nothing to do with any of the other reasons associated with having it done. One does lose a lot of sensitivity removing the foreskin. It offers many functions from protection of the glans to lubrication of it. When the glans is continually, exposed to the elements, it loses sensitivity. I think all reasons for removing it save, medically, are not worth mutilating a functioning piece of anatomy.

:violin: he makes it sound like he's talking about the death of a family member lol... oh and "lubrication of the glans"? How does that work? Not to be contrary either but...wouldn't more sensitivity lead to quicker ejaculation? I dunno, I'm far from unhappy with sex and I'm cut lol. If the foreskin just keeps the glans "protected" so the skin is less exposed, what would nerve endings in the foreskin do? it folds back anyway. By that logic, couldn't I put say, a thin silicon wrap or something on my penis and achieve the same effect after a few years?

I dunno I always just think they look like those sandworms from Dune

 

[Nordling]

Hmmm... I think Nordling either has me on iggy or didn't see my previous post. Like I said in another related thread, I have no regrets because you can't miss something you've never felt before.

:lol: Sorry. No, I saw it AFTER I posted mine...a case of synchronicity or something. I think we agree on something! lol

 

[hornygods]

I operate on a very basic principle - I don't care if you do it to your kid, but don't do it on mine.

 

[SNATCH]

However... As far as the circumcision goes... I feel bad for cut guys. They'll never know the joy of being uncut. The benefits, the sensitivity, the pleasure that comes from simply being uncut. Watching an uncut guy touch his penis, compared to a cut guy - totally different.

Exactly my logic. Anytime I ever mention my views on this, though, I get attacked by pretty much every girl and even the vast majority of guys. I just think the act of circumcision is barbaric and gross. Especially when done on an infant... "But they can't remember it!" So? It still hurts them and I just couldn't comprehend hurting a baby. Then it hurts badly for them to urinate in their diaper until it heals. I could never put my baby through that. It's so unnecessary.

"But it looks gross/weird if it's not!" That's because most girls are used to what cut looks like, uncut it natural and just fine to me, thank you. The idea of beauty is ever changing as well, back in the middle ages only women with super tiny breasts and huge waists were attractive.

"But they don't have any stamina during sex!" I've slept with someone who was uncut, and he had plenty of stamina.

"But it's easier to clean and helps prevent diseases!" Any guy I've met who had it uncut has never complained about it being "too hard" to clean and if they are sleeping with someone they aren't sure is STD free, they should be using a condom anyway. Just my :twocents-02cents: .

Yeah, everyone jumps up my ass too. It's annoying. But whatever, everyone else can suck my fucking dick. - shrug. I feel the same way about asshole who clip the ears && tails of dogs. I think the people who have those things performed, && who think it's okay to do so should have their dicks/clits cut off.

The thing about it looking weird or gross is just stupid. Big fucking deal. The twats that say that act like their shit looks like motherfucking gold. Well guess what bitch, it doesn't.

I've never heard anyone say anything about stamina. That doesn't even make sense. I would tempted to punch a bitch in the face if I heard that, lol.

As far as easier to clean, my husband actually WANTED to get cut, because he wanted it to be easier to clean. He wanted his penis to be less high maintenance. But, one of the things he let me in on after we'd been dating for awhile, is that basically he "wipes" after he pees. Not literally wiping, like you'd wipe your ass, but a bit of tissue to dab it dry. Which I think is awesome, because thinking of guys who shake their dick off, makes me want to fucking vomit, esp if we're thinking about MY FACE getting anywhere near that same dick. Ew.

but how do uncut guys know they're more sensitive, and how do cut guys know they're less sensitive? Cut guys cum faster or something?

I don't think "they" per se do. That's not really what I meant, lol. .

well I think it's mostly an urban legend about cut guys beeing less sensitive and cumming not so fast as uncut guys.
it's all a "game" of experience, psycology and the ability to use the pbc(don't know the exact definition) muscle.

I didn't mean the "sensitive" part in having anything to do with cumming. I meant sensitivity in general... As far as nerve endings, sensations, feeling, etc.

I've read that adult males who got cut regret it because they lost sensation...

My husband wanted to get cut at one point a few years ago, I was like really? I don't think you should, && I wish you wouldn't, but if that is REALLY what you want to do... Go for it? BUT READ UP ON IT. I did a lot of Googling, && reading, && found that almost every man who did it later in life, REGRETTED IT. && it was painful as fuck. && they got scarring. HE changed his mind REAL quick, esp after I started showing him pics...

The logic is that the foreskin harbors about a bajillion nerve endings, but who knows? Maybe those nerves that remain become more sensitive--and they'd have to, since after the operation, the skin becomes thicker. Such a study, in any case, would be difficult for one reason--few guys are going to admit to being "diminished erotically" no matter what has happened to them under the knife.

I believe that the foreskin harbors nerve endings. Of course, I think that it's gonna somewhat feel more sensitive/less for each man, similar to how one guy could like a finger in his asshole, compared to another guy not wanting anything within a 50 mile radius around his asshole. Personal preference. Some like pain, some don't. I can tell you, that when I play with my husband foreskin, he can feel it, && depending on what I am doing with it, he can REALLY feel it, or really just be like eh. As far as the "Such a study, in any case, would be difficult for one reason--few guys are going to admit to being "diminished erotically" no matter what has happened to them under the knife." I think that's total horseshit. Why the fuck would someone NOT be honest, if it's in a study? Most studies && shit like that are anon. Any man who would not be honest is A: NOT A REAL MAN && B: A fucking DIPSHIT.

Like I said in another related thread, I have no regrets because you can't miss something you've never felt before.

Well said!

and "lubrication of the glans"? How does that work? Not to be contrary either but...wouldn't more sensitivity lead to quicker ejaculation? I dunno, I'm far from unhappy with sex and I'm cut lol. If the foreskin just keeps the glans "protected" so the skin is less exposed, what would nerve endings in the foreskin do? it folds back anyway. By that logic, couldn't I put say, a thin silicon wrap or something on my penis and achieve the same effect after a few years?

By lubrication of the glans, I think he didn't word that properly. The foreskin slides back && forth over the head of the penis. During sex, && while self enjoyment time. When said head of penis is wet, from lube, snatch juice, or precum, it's gonna lube that shit up so it slides back && forth easier. Think about beating off with lube, compared to not. I have rolled my husbands foreskin back, && then asked him to leave it til he get's limp, && HE DOES NOT LIKE IT. I have like blown on it, when it's dry, with the foreskin back, && he does NOT like the way it feels. Too sensitive. I also notice, the skin looks dry, && slightly wrinkled... Because it's used to being wrapped up. Unless an uncut penis is hard, or someone had intentionally rolled the skin back, it stays in it's own carrying case.

 

[inkydoo]

As far as the "Such a study, in any case, would be difficult for one reason--few guys are going to admit to being "diminished erotically" no matter what has happened to them under the knife." I think that's total horseshit. Why the fuck would someone NOT be honest, if it's in a study? Most studies && shit like that are anon. Any man who would not be honest is A: NOT A REAL MAN && B: A fucking DIPSHIT.

There's a well known psychological phenomenon in which people tend to over-value the choices they make because to question their decisions would, in some ways, be to question themselves and who they are post-decision. I wouldn't call it dishonesty, but I would say it impacts one's ability to be "truly" honest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice-supportive_bias
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-purchase_rationalization

Note also that people debating strongly polarizing issues (like circumcision) often display Confirmation bias.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

 

[GemmaMarie]

I think as far as the parents choice to practice circumcision on an infant- it's a bit like religion. You can have your opinion and practice whatever the fuck you want, but the minute you try to force that opinion on someone else by telling them "You're wrong" is when it's going to get really ugly. There is no "right" or "wrong". Every case is different, I've seen guys who did say "damn, I wish my parents had/hadn't cut me" just like I've heard guys say "fuck yeah I am glad I am/am not" Either way the parents picked the choice THEY thought was best for their child, and the vast majority of the time guys don't really complain about the choice their parent made.

As far as the "reasons" people might argue for circumcision, it's important to remember that a lot of these arguments ARE (or actually, WERE) valid. Being cut is "cleaner" and does help on the STD front, but anymore, in any first world country, this really isn't an issue because parents are smart enough to teach hygiene and safe sex education and means is relatively easy to come by, but in the past when circumcision came around, this wasn't true so being cut did have actual health benefits as far as that's concerned. They are also still valid in some 3rd world countries/areas that don't have the same hygiene practices, etc. available. But really that's a mute point- since most people arguing this aren't subject to those conditions.

I can't really comment on the sensation battle though, except that I've been with both and they both appeared to equally enjoy the experience AND it was about equally as long, so stamina didn't seem affected regardless... but ya know- one persons experience- not very scientific

 

[TashaDutch]

Most girls in the US maybe, I couldn't say because I haven't shown most of them my dick. I'm getting round to it though.
Outside the US uncut is the norm cept for wierdo religulous folks ofc.

lol i think alot of outside us girl dont really bother to think about it.. since its pretty uncommon.. or that the guy had a medical problem that needed to be fixed..
9 out 10 cocks i saw/felt were uncut.. so not sure if i can have an objective opinion about it.. but i kinda like the way forskin rolls over the dickhead when i give handjobs..
the one cock i did jerk off that was uncut.. wasnt atractive to begin with.. so no good experiences here..