For anybody wanting to watch a lecture on Sexual attraction in males and females. It's quite lengthy, but I want to talk about it!
AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
Sexual Attraction Study
- Thread starter AwesomeKate
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
- Status
I do not like facials, big breasts, feet, or penises. Now I feel like an even bigger weirdo.
That was a little over 30 minutes mostly wasted, sort of interesting. My major critique was in that the illusion/ fantasy part was not explored enough. The alpha male thing with women and the penis thing for men misses reality completely.
On a previous topic about models being sex workers I referred to romance novelists as possible sex workers for women, but this talk was reading too much into it if they think illusion applies to reality.
If you think bigger breasts will attract more men, or being more an alpha male more women, this would be a big mistake. The illusion of bigger breasts and being alpha male might :twocents-02cents: .
On a previous topic about models being sex workers I referred to romance novelists as possible sex workers for women, but this talk was reading too much into it if they think illusion applies to reality.
If you think bigger breasts will attract more men, or being more an alpha male more women, this would be a big mistake. The illusion of bigger breasts and being alpha male might :twocents-02cents: .
I found it to be pretty interesting! I liked listening, anyways. It's always fun (to me) to hear stuff like this.
I read a book by Matt Ridley called the Red Queen.
Its heavy stuff and took me a long time to read, but it did more for my understanding of human nature and things like attraction than a semester at uni. I cannot recommend it enough.
https://d1e0u2actw4eb3.cloudfront.net/e ... 0Queen.pdf
Its heavy stuff and took me a long time to read, but it did more for my understanding of human nature and things like attraction than a semester at uni. I cannot recommend it enough.
https://d1e0u2actw4eb3.cloudfront.net/e ... 0Queen.pdf
I would like to hope that humans are not so easily reduced to acting on base instincts when it comes to interacting with other humans. That perhaps there might be some cognitive recognition of these base instincts and the ability to examine them and maybe, you know, not just think with your penis or your ovaries. This hope is rather slim at this point in my life.
And as a man, I can't help but comment on the fact that the things that women are attracted to are based on a woman's ability to accurately assess things like what a man is thinking and whether he is good at stuff. Given my experiences, there seems to be some room for improvement there.
And as a man, I can't help but comment on the fact that the things that women are attracted to are based on a woman's ability to accurately assess things like what a man is thinking and whether he is good at stuff. Given my experiences, there seems to be some room for improvement there.
I read it too when it came out, during that time I was in my psychology days, I also found topics by Desmond Morris interesting as well.Red7227 said:
http://www.gendernetwork.com/humansexes ... 63gPPldXOM
- Status
