I understand. Eveeryone has different experiences when camming and each situation differes from another no matter what cam site you model.
Yes, but at the same time, basing a perception of a site on rooms that probably just haven't been caught breaking the rules yet, and likely not the history of what has happened on the site, might not be the most accurate, helpful, and objective interpretation for new models perusing this forum for grounded information. So I'm glad I purposefully used the word "opinion". Everyone has one.
My conclusion is based on working on the site myself (SC) experiencing the high frequency of very real and very workflow-affected glitches, as well as reading daily about terrible site rules, and horrible things SC punishes members and models for, here on this forum, for more than 5 years. Then comparing these things that actually have happened, to my real life work experience on 2 of the other big cam sites (SM & MFC) for the last 12 years. So I'm not trying to be unfriendly, and I know this could be interpreted as aggressive, but I really care deeply about the real, true, and honest exchange of information that we often have, here, as colleagues and internet friends. I also really care deeply about not bending the knee to perceived organizations (OR PEOPLE) of power, publicly, and instead continuing the flow of honest, real conversation, where we put our egos and fears aside, and tell it like it really is.
SC is a site that for many years would not allow models to run their own rooms properly. They didn't even create the block feature, which worked less than half the time on my account, so I actually wouldn't even call it a working block feature, for YEARS. Literal years after models
asked begged for it. They let abusive members run riot, and did nothing about it, to show support for those of us actually taking risks, and actually making money to line their pockets. Which was not me,
for very long, after I experienced that BS.
What I'm trying to say is you didn't really put forth a very concvincing arguement to back up what you were saying, and on top of that we are distracting from the OP's purpose (I think) in making this thread. Although, actually I might be kinda wrong on that one.
If you want to put forth more argument, I'll consider it, and address it. But what you've said thus far has not made a convincing rationale for me to change my opinion.
You do seem nice though, and I think it's cool we all talk openly about these sites, to help each other.
(Sorry about grammar in a huge rush today, guys)