Is it just me, or do other people agree that the video quality on MFC, even in HD rooms, is inferior to the quality on Streamate?
Whenever I poke around Streamate, the picture is crisp, responsive - it looks very... touchable.
On MFC, the lines are softer, the motion is kinda sluggish, and the colors are... flat?
I thought it could be a bandwidth issue, but no, I just checked. One of the popular HD rooms on MFC (soft, sluggish picture) I gave me a steady 130 kB/s. However, a random room on Streamate (crisp, quick picture) had the bandwidth fluctuating between 30 and 80 kB/s. So, less traffic, better picture on Streamate.
Why so unfair?
I love MFC, I don't want to go over to the dark side! :crybaby:
Whenever I poke around Streamate, the picture is crisp, responsive - it looks very... touchable.
On MFC, the lines are softer, the motion is kinda sluggish, and the colors are... flat?
I thought it could be a bandwidth issue, but no, I just checked. One of the popular HD rooms on MFC (soft, sluggish picture) I gave me a steady 130 kB/s. However, a random room on Streamate (crisp, quick picture) had the bandwidth fluctuating between 30 and 80 kB/s. So, less traffic, better picture on Streamate.
Why so unfair?
I love MFC, I don't want to go over to the dark side! :crybaby: