MFC Agent ??banned?

[AmberCutie]

99 didn't get banned because she broke the MFC rules. She got banned because she repeatedly violated the 2257 laws and that puts MFC at a real risk of being sued or shut down.

It's not a problem if someone accidentally shows up in the background. MFC can say they didn't know about it or they gave her an appropriate warning. But when it repeatedly and blatently happens over and over, MFC can no longer act like they are not complacent, especially since they are profiting from her actions. At that point it would be easy to successfully sue MFC since one could argue they knew and encouraged her behavior.

If a model had a public show in which no other people are shown, MFC would not care. Like if she's in a coffee shop but all you can see is her against the wall, there is no problem from MFC's perspective. They could argue that the whole situation is fake including sound effects and voice actors. Of course if she really is in a public coffee shop then the law may arrest her, but MFC is not affected.

The lesson for other models is that you can probably get away with having public shows as long as random people aren't on cam. So have fun in a bathroom stall, changing room, your car, etc. Just don't show other people on cam. The police may get involved if you get caught, but MFC won't care.

This makes the most sense. Thank you for your well worded post.

Of course we still have to call this speculation since there's no way to confirm with the MFC admins.

 

[danavixen]

Mfc should ban those old fat bags :confused2: nothing is better then a young beautifull woman wihout sagging tits or a fat ass

Whats your point? That you personally like young models, and find mature models distasteful. Well I like the color purple, and no one gives a shit about that, any more than they give a shit about your personal taste in models. Stick to the subject, this blog thread isn't about you. :naughty:

did i asked you anything ? besides who the fuck are you to tell me what todo another granny fan say bye bye to your granny :mrgreen:

By posting in a thread you're opening yourself for discussion. This is generally known as "participating in the conversation". Could you tell me your MFC screen name so I can block you from my room?
I'd feel terrible if you clicked on my room and saw that a porn star has curves. It's apparent that isn't the body type you preffer, and you'd be offended. However, I don't want to have to deal with you trolling my room and ruining it for everyone who does like my body type and age.

 

[danavixen]

99 didn't get banned because she broke the MFC rules. She got banned because she repeatedly violated the 2257 laws and that puts MFC at a real risk of being sued or shut down.

It's not a problem if someone accidentally shows up in the background. MFC can say they didn't know about it or they gave her an appropriate warning. But when it repeatedly and blatently happens over and over, MFC can no longer act like they are not complacent, especially since they are profiting from her actions. At that point it would be easy to successfully sue MFC since one could argue they knew and encouraged her behavior.

If a model had a public show in which no other people are shown, MFC would not care. Like if she's in a coffee shop but all you can see is her against the wall, there is no problem from MFC's perspective. They could argue that the whole situation is fake including sound effects and voice actors. Of course if she really is in a public coffee shop then the law may arrest her, but MFC is not affected.

The lesson for other models is that you can probably get away with having public shows as long as random people aren't on cam. So have fun in a bathroom stall, changing room, your car, etc. Just don't show other people on cam. The police may get involved if you get caught, but MFC won't care.

Ah, yes the 2257! Forgot about those. Heh. Yes, the liability for MFC was probably through the roof with her actions. Her shows were so entertaining to me, but I must admit, I wasnt a fan of seeing unsuspecting people being pointed out.

 

[Mikeythegeek]

99 didn't get banned because she broke the MFC rules. She got banned because she repeatedly violated the 2257 laws and that puts MFC at a real risk of being sued or shut down.

It's not a problem if someone accidentally shows up in the background. MFC can say they didn't know about it or they gave her an appropriate warning. But when it repeatedly and blatently happens over and over, MFC can no longer act like they are not complacent, especially since they are profiting from her actions. At that point it would be easy to successfully sue MFC since one could argue they knew and encouraged her behavior.

If a model had a public show in which no other people are shown, MFC would not care. Like if she's in a coffee shop but all you can see is her against the wall, there is no problem from MFC's perspective. They could argue that the whole situation is fake including sound effects and voice actors. Of course if she really is in a public coffee shop then the law may arrest her, but MFC is not affected.

The lesson for other models is that you can probably get away with having public shows as long as random people aren't on cam. So have fun in a bathroom stall, changing room, your car, etc. Just don't show other people on cam. The police may get involved if you get caught, but MFC won't care.

This makes the most sense. Thank you for your well worded post.

Of course we still have to call this speculation since there's no way to confirm with the MFC admins.

Indeed on all counts. The 2257 laws with the frequent men on cam and the occasional child on cam... yeah, the only question then becomes "why the hell did it take so long?"

 

[Bocefish]

99 didn't get banned because she broke the MFC rules. She got banned because she repeatedly violated the 2257 laws and that puts MFC at a real risk of being sued or shut down.

It's not a problem if someone accidentally shows up in the background. MFC can say they didn't know about it or they gave her an appropriate warning. But when it repeatedly and blatently happens over and over, MFC can no longer act like they are not complacent, especially since they are profiting from her actions. At that point it would be easy to successfully sue MFC since one could argue they knew and encouraged her behavior.

If a model had a public show in which no other people are shown, MFC would not care. Like if she's in a coffee shop but all you can see is her against the wall, there is no problem from MFC's perspective. They could argue that the whole situation is fake including sound effects and voice actors. Of course if she really is in a public coffee shop then the law may arrest her, but MFC is not affected.

The lesson for other models is that you can probably get away with having public shows as long as random people aren't on cam. So have fun in a bathroom stall, changing room, your car, etc. Just don't show other people on cam. The police may get involved if you get caught, but MFC won't care.

This makes the most sense. Thank you for your well worded post.

Of course we still have to call this speculation since there's no way to confirm with the MFC admins.

Indeed on all counts. The 2257 laws with the frequent men on cam and the occasional child on cam... yeah, the only question then becomes "why the hell did it take so long?"

Why did it take MFC so long? Maybe Leo had to consult his lawyers. Why didn't Amanda get the hint after her first two suspensions? Because she's brilliant and a genius, several people even said so.

 

[Jupiter551]

she also got bolder, she seemed to have a "they can't ban me, I *AM* MFC!" attitude toward the end, as if she was completely immune from the rules.

 

[maryland]

old piglip a99 got what was comming to her i scene many times guys on cam like at that hotel is one that comes to mine but 4 me the one that says it all is when there was a child on her cam. by acciedant or not thats wrong and she should feel lucky thats all mfc did i only wish i was able to film it when it happen so i could supply it to mfc and the law! if agent99 supports call that "new and different" your a bunch of sick assholes!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Jessi J]

old piglip a99 got what was comming to her i scene many times guys on cam like at that hotel is one that comes to mine but 4 me the one that says it all is when there was a child on her cam. by acciedant or not thats wrong and she should feel lucky thats all mfc did i only wish i was able to film it when it happen so i could supply it to mfc and the law! if agent99 supports call that "new and different" your a bunch of sick assholes!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a horribly worded post. The lack of punctuation was appalling.

MFC has shown that you can record video of the incident, take screenshots, and send them to MFC directly and they do not care. Even the local police have been supplied with these pictures and videos, and it has done no good.

At the end of the day, MFC just wants their money and only step up and take action when they are threatened.

 

[Frank01]

sorry i will send to admin..

 

[Jupiter551]

might be out off topic, but where do we post these ??? aren't they violations???


http://imgur.com/a/pU9BP

This is Amber's forum to discuss shit, not a place to point-out models breaking the rules - and that wasn't the point of this thread it just grew into that as a result of the discussed-model's reactions.

I'm sure you have better things to do than make screenshots of every woman sticking anything in herself in public chat, but if not I guess you can send them to MFC support? No one else really cares.

 

[Bocefish]

Models break rules?

 

[Zoomer]

sorry i will send to admin..

Can't believe you're going on this pathetic crusade. You will be contacting the admins about... 23,000 times over the next 2-3 months - as, apart from a minority, the vast majority of models break at least one rule, possibly more (about 26,000 models have been online over the past few months).

Firstly - feel free (since you're off on one, yet so assured of your righteousness) to post the names of your favourite models who you think are being negatively impacted by all this.
Secondly, do you really think MFC cares about the type of rule breaking you posted? Leo was in a models room watching her break several rules whilst entertaining 5000+ people...and did nothing. You're wasting your time and their time. The rules WILL NOT CHANGE, and at best they'll just ignore you - at worst they may just randomly fine a few ladies of some hard earned tokens - making MFC richer, and a girl poorer. Worse still, the girl will be bewildered and upset by the unfairness of she is punished for what everyone else is doing without punishment.

What a nice chap you are

Maybe you should read a few threads around here first, get a feel for what it's like for the models before you charge off with valiant screencap button brandished aloft! :lol:

 

[MadisonLeigh]

It's cute that you think that admin has no idea that rule breaking occurs, and they are just waiting for some brave soul to take it upon himself to present screencaps :roll:

 

[Cordoba855]

lol if she gets busted for indecent exposure she'll end up on their sex offender's registry, it says the minimum length of time for that is 15 years and she'd have to register with them every year :lol:

Let's just say someone I know (cough) has reported her to a few child protection agencies including one within the FBI. The reports are being investigated and have been filed as "dangerous to children" and "potential safety hazard", somehow those are different? Either way, something CAN be done about this and if anyone has any screencaps they'd like to share I can send you the e-mail that is accepting evidence for her case just PM me.

They said that her having a child appear on cam is a federal offence and that they would appreciate any and all evidence that can be found so they can compile a complete case without possibility of acquittal and continuance of the actions. (And no, the children to not have to be in any sort of undress of even be aware of her actions to be considered a child endangerment and possible pornography charge).

I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more discussion. First of all, how would you know what Federal investigators would appreciate in terms of evidence, or know what anything has been filed in terms of an official investigation? Those kinds of things are usually kept very secret until it's time to make an arrest, but apparently you're involved with the investigation? I don't exactly understand.

Second, if A99 is arrested and prosecuted on child pornography charges, which you seem to be suggesting is in the works, wouldn't every single person who viewed her room, at least during the incidents in question, be guilty of viewing child pornography, from the viewpoint of the FBI or whoever it is you're in contact with?

At the very least, wouldn't the tippers be in trouble, and at most, couldn't MFC itself be in very serious trouble here?

 

[Lydia_Deetz]

Oh geeeez :roll:

I don't even do any public shows/rule breaking on MFC and would love to pre-ban frank01 because he is a super douche.

 

[Anonymous]

If a person makes it their mission to capture shots of every MFC model who break the rules, that person might as well quit their day job, because he/she will be capturing that shit ALL DAY/NIGHT. It would be better if that person spent their time doing something nice for their favorite models who DO follow the rules...such as rating her profile five stars, posting a nice comment on her wall, visiting her chat and telling her how awesome you think she is.

Hell, I know a girl who has even sent letters to Leo (expressing her opinion on MFC rule-breaking), and he hasn't even bothered responding to her.

It's pretty annoying/kinda funny when basics (when unmuted) ask "How much for public cum show?" :lol: You're a basic...why are you asking that question? LOL.

They are so used to seeing public cum shows all over MFC, that in every room they go to they expect that model to do the same. 1) I don't do public cum shows, because I require that EVERYONE watching me fuck a dildo is paying me...EVERYONE. 2) I don't need a bunch of non-paying basics demanding the premiums to tip because they "wanna cum." That's just LAME. Don't be ordering somebody else to tip for something that YOU wanna see/cum from. :roll:

 

[NoelleBright]

Hell, I know a girl who has even sent letters to Leo (expressing her opinion on MFC rule-breaking), and he hasn't even bothered responding to her.

If I'm not mistaken, didn't he even change his email address on her because she was rallying up a bunch of girls who were all sending him this crap? :lol:

 

[Bocefish]

if A99 is arrested and prosecuted on child pornography charges, which you seem to be suggesting is in the works, wouldn't every single person who viewed her room, at least during the incidents in question, be guilty of viewing child pornography, from the viewpoint of the FBI or whoever it is you're in contact with?

At the very least, wouldn't the tippers be in trouble, and at most, couldn't MFC itself be in very serious trouble here?

:roll:

In a word, NO.

 

[maryland]

:lol: it seems some here can not read!! what i said was" if a child was scene on a99 " i said nothing about a nude child or porn! if a99 fines some weak minded person [male or female adult] to help her break the mfc rules then so be it! if anyone here or on mfc take the time to read the rule instead of guessing at them you will see in plain english "no children on cam for any reason"! the other rules can be bent between 2 adults "nude or not" in short [nickT] sumed it up very well.
is this enough punctuation for you? [, ! . ? : " '] ??? i did not realize i was in grammer school.

 

[Keithy]

:lol: it seems some here can not read!! what i said was" if a child was scene on a99 " i said nothing about a nude child or porn! if a99 fines some weak minded person [male or female adult] to help her break the mfc rules then so be it! if anyone here or on mfc take the time to read the rule instead of guessing at them you will see in plain english "no children on cam for any reason"! the other rules can be bent between 2 adults "nude or not" in short [nickT] sumed it up very well.
is this enough punctuation for you? [, ! . ? : " '] ??? i did not realize i was in grammer school.

What the fuck are you on about? You no what, never mind. I don't care.

 

[AmberCutie]

:lol: it seems some here can not read!! what i said was" if a child was scene on a99 " i said nothing about a nude child or porn! if a99 fines some weak minded person [male or female adult] to help her break the mfc rules then so be it! if anyone here or on mfc take the time to read the rule instead of guessing at them you will see in plain english "no children on cam for any reason"! the other rules can be bent between 2 adults "nude or not" in short [nickT] sumed it up very well.
is this enough punctuation for you? [, ! . ? : " '] ??? i did not realize i was in grammer school.

I think the request for punctuation was to help us read what seems to be not-so-great English. I'm sure you understand.

I don't think anyone was arguing your point about being glad that MFC finally did something about her breaking the "no child on cam for any reason" rule. I think the problem everyone agrees on is that it took so long for MFC to react to such rule-breaking, and probably only did so because it became more of a problem/liability for them. It probably became too difficult just to turn a blind eye due to someone taking some sort of action against them.

 

[maryland]

In the lounge and someone said this (I think it's a joke)

99 was climbing to high in the month Miss MyFreeCams chart and they were afraid she might go to #1 so they banned her

:lol: what a joke this above quote is do you really think mfc cares who is no#1 or 2 or3? as long as there making money and the police and goverment is not coming after them or mfc being dragged into court. they could care less who is # 1.2.3.or4

 

[Keithy]

Are you trying to explain the joke like some kind of yet undiscovered idiot?
Or did you just not understand that when someone says it's a joke you somehow miss the fact that it's a joke?

 

[Zoomer]

can't....resist....obvious....cheap....joke....
fuck it.

You know that posting pictures of Agent_99 is banned, right? :icon-twisted:



:whistle: (where's the whew smiley )

 

[Anna_Swallows]

What name does she use on webcams.com?

:lol:

Is she on Webcam.com or Webcams.com? One of these is also another site of Streamate. Just wondering.

 

[camstory]

What name does she use on webcams.com?

:lol:

Is she on Webcam.com or Webcams.com? One of these is also another site of Streamate. Just wondering.

webcams.com / girlinohio

 

[camstory]

Are you trying to explain the joke like some kind of yet undiscovered idiot?
Or did you just not understand that when someone says it's a joke you somehow miss the fact that it's a joke?

Harsh, but funny, you know your spinning your wheels... you can't fix stupid.

 

[camstory]

Well, it might appear that I'm letting my team down some - seeing as how we all came here in the last couple of days, and all jumped off right in the middle of this thread. Mind you, I don't aspire to find my place among my fellow noob's, frank01, Belgian, and maryland, but at some point(it could be this post) I feel it is inevitable, that I exhibit a degree of those unfixable traits my fellow noob's seem to carry in their dna. Though the beench mark has been set quite high in this, I can only hope, that when I stumble into line, that I fall well short of that mark.

 

[AerynShade]

My god I love Tim Minchin. Yeah, I know, off-topic.

 

[Cordoba855]

if A99 is arrested and prosecuted on child pornography charges, which you seem to be suggesting is in the works, wouldn't every single person who viewed her room, at least during the incidents in question, be guilty of viewing child pornography, from the viewpoint of the FBI or whoever it is you're in contact with?

At the very least, wouldn't the tippers be in trouble, and at most, couldn't MFC itself be in very serious trouble here?

:roll:

In a word, NO.

Can I ask why, exactly? Considering how ambitious some prosecutors can be, I'm legitimately concerned here.