MyFreeCams Search/Sorting

[BarbieLuv]

Wrong. I already explained it. I'm not one to mess with another guy's woman in general, but I also don't want to hang out with a model on MFC who has some dude looking over her shoulder if I can help it. So when I see a model selling "boy girl videos" I click "Next". Sorry. And married women are completely off limits to me. That's just principle..

Ok. So the assumption of you hoping for a date/relationship/future wifey isn't for anyone here to assume. Let's toss the "looking for a date" to the shredder. There's a side tangent from the original topic, and for plausible reason. The idea of searching for "single" and "straight" females definitely raises suspicion, particularly when models maintain their guard for any number of reasons. Sure, what you're looking for could be simply preference and nothing more. But from an outsider's perspective and especially in the context of MFC, it's never clear on what your true intentions are, which is the reason for so much questioning. Also, you're implying of meeting up with models up close & personal doesn't help, as we're aware of any potential risks from meeting strangers off the internet. You may be a perfectly swell individual, but it's a matter of those 'just in case' circumstances.

Let me make it simple. The criteria by which I select a cam girl is the same criteria by which I select a woman in "real life". My tastes don't change when I go online.

But you see... This isn't real life. This is fantasy. You're not selecting a woman the way you would in real life, because the objective is not the same. With a camgirl, your aim is to have fun and get off in an NSA fashion, whereas with IRL interactions the aim is a romantic and physical connection. When you're watching porn, you don't look for a wedding ring - Think of camgirls as in-real-time porn, and you'll get a lot further and be happier without any misconceptions.

 

[Joeternal]

Wrong. I already explained it. I'm not one to mess with another guy's woman in general, but I also don't want to hang out with a model on MFC who has some dude looking over her shoulder if I can help it. So when I see a model selling "boy girl videos" I click "Next". Sorry. And married women are completely off limits to me. That's just principle..

Ok. So the assumption of you hoping for a date/relationship/future wifey isn't for anyone here to assume. Let's toss the "looking for a date" to the shredder. There's a side tangent from the original topic, and for plausible reason. The idea of searching for "single" and "straight" females definitely raises suspicion, particularly when models maintain their guard for any number of reasons. Sure, what you're looking for could be simply preference and nothing more. But from an outsider's perspective and especially in the context of MFC, it's never clear on what your true intentions are, which is the reason for so much questioning. Also, you're implying of meeting up with models up close & personal doesn't help, as we're aware of any potential risks from meeting strangers off the internet. You may be a perfectly swell individual, but it's a matter of those 'just in case' circumstances.

Let me make it simple. The criteria by which I select a cam girl is the same criteria by which I select a woman in "real life". My tastes don't change when I go online.

But you see... This isn't real life. This is fantasy. You're not selecting a woman the way you would in real life, because the objective is not the same. With a camgirl, your aim is to have fun and get off in an NSA fashion, whereas with IRL interactions the aim is a romantic and physical connection. When you're watching porn, you don't look for a wedding ring - Think of camgirls as in-real-time porn, and you'll get a lot further and be happier without any misconceptions.

Ok, let me rephrase yet again. I'm turned off by some of the qualities I listed not being met. If I'm attracted to a woman, even if it's pure "fantasy", I don't want to see her with some other guy. I lose interest. I'm not a fan of hardcore porn for the same reason. Cam sites allow you to be real, one on one, even if it never goes any further.

 

[BarbieLuv]

I just want to stop this discussion for a second to say exactly how ironic I find it that you are posting all of this on a forum run by a model who doesn't meet your criteria.

 

[Joeternal]

I just want to stop this discussion for a second to say exactly how ironic I find it that you are posting all of this on a forum run by a model who doesn't meet your criteria.

In which case I should point out that I wanted to talk about the search functionality of MFC.

 

[JoleneBrody]

Because I was bored I wanted to clarify why I find this most annoying. It is NOT because you have irrational requirements or because I think the search option in general is a bad idea.
It is because of the specifics that you felt necessary to list... and because I'm bored and my eyes are too itchy to go outside.
This is only the first two lines. I circled some bi-curious and some who just did not list any marital status because most bi-curious woman are straight... such as myself.



The idea that you feel that a porn-hub search type feature would make it easier to find white straight women with minimal tattoos who list themselves as single easier... is just... I dunno. I don't even know man! Are you sure you're even on Myfreecams? :lol: Because that's like... most everyone.

I'm nit picking but I guess if things are going to be suggested to MFC, I would like them to be suggested for good reason! Otherwise the site is crashing and making life miserable for weeks in order to create a new feature for a stupid reason, and HiGirls has that job on lock down...

 

[Joeternal]

Because I was bored I wanted to clarify why I find this most annoying. It is NOT because you have irrational requirements or because I think the search option in general is a bad idea.
It is because of the specifics that you felt necessary to list... and because I'm bored and my eyes are too itchy to go outside.
This is only the first two lines. I circled some bi-curious and some who just did not list any marital status because most bi-curious woman are straight... such as myself.



The idea that you feel that a porn-hub search type feature would make it easier to find white straight women with minimal tattoos who list themselves as single easier... is just... I dunno. I don't even know man! Are you sure you're even on Myfreecams? :lol: Because that's like... most everyone.

I'm nit picking but I guess if things are going to be suggested to MFC, I would like them to be suggested for good reason! Otherwise the site is crashing and making life miserable for weeks in order to create a new feature for a stupid reason, and HiGirls has that job on lock down...

I am aware of (and quite fond of) several of the models you circled. I will say no more. Which suggests I should be there now, instead of here. But this idea is legitimate. There are models who fit my criteria online, but it would still filter out about half of the models in that picture. A guy who has more obscure tastes should be able to filter down to what he wants as well.

 

[mutantdonut]

Let me make it simple. The criteria by which I select a cam girl is the same criteria by which I select a woman in "real life". My tastes don't change when I go online.

Yes i understand that.

My point being is that however you define yourself after the fact won't fully resonate with already suspicious models, especially after emphasizing your search preference is for single women. It's just natural inclination for anyone who maintains their guard up. It might be unfair, but it's how it is.

 

[Shaun__]

Here are some "single" models for you to investigate.

 

[Joeternal]

Here are some "single" models for you to investigate.

The problem with the search feature is that you can only use one criteria at a time. It's not a big change to do what I'm saying.

 

[Shaun__]

Here are some "single" models for you to investigate.

The problem with the search feature is that you can only use one criteria at a time. It's not a big change to do what I'm saying.

It dropped you down to 18 models, two that have me region blocked, you should be able to check them for tattoos or anything else in short order.

 

[Joeternal]

Here are some "single" models for you to investigate.

The problem with the search feature is that you can only use one criteria at a time. It's not a big change to do what I'm saying.

It dropped you down to 18 models, two that have me region blocked, you should be able to check them for tattoos or anything else in short order.

There are many more than 18. You have to sort by marital status, instead of searching by the word. Simply put, the functionality already basically exists on the site, it's just poorly implemented.

 

[JoleneBrody]

I'm sorry for calling you lame OP. That wasn't very nice of me.

 

[Aella]

I just want to stop this discussion for a second to say exactly how ironic I find it that you are posting all of this on a forum run by a model who doesn't meet your criteria.

Gemma how is this even relevant? It's not ironic. It has nothing to do with the discussion, it is a personal attack. Is it ironic that he uses Facebook when he's not gay for Mark Zuckerberg?

There is nothing wrong with looking for single women on camsites. Assuming that when a man looks for a single woman on MFC means that he's automatically looking for a date is defensive, presumptuous, and disrespectful to the motives of individuals, ESPECIALLY when he has clarified otherwise.

There is a myriad of reasons that a man might want a single woman beyond "I want to meet her and fuck." It is a thrill to talk to a woman and feel like you have a chance to be the one to make her happy, and if there is another man in her life, you know you won't be the one doing that.

And that is absolutely okay to feel. It is ok for a man to feel what he wants and want what he wants. You shouldn't shame him for having desires. You shouldn't shame anyone for anything unless it actually hurts someone, and in this case especially there is absolutely no evidence that harm is being done. And hell - if he does want to find a woman on MFC to meet and fuck, that's still not harming her as long as he's respecting her boundaries. I do know of women who have dated members, it's ridiculous to pretend that it doesn't happen. There is no reason to be offended if someone earnestly asks you to meet up. Simply say no. You set your own rules, and let him want what he wants.

We need to stop assuming that every single man in the world is trying to stalk us. We shouldn't be so quick to judge.

I've noticed a trend where a gang of girls attack men on this forum for posting questions, specifically newcomers. It really disgusts me and I wonder where the attitude of tolerance and love went. Reading this just makes me feel really sympathetic and sorry for some of the men who come here with good intentions and find out they've stepped into a den of wolves.

 

[zippypinhead]

I've noticed a trend where a gang of girls attack men on this forum for posting questions, specifically newcomers. It really disgusts me and I wonder where the attitude of tolerance and love went. Reading this just makes me feel really sympathetic and sorry for some of the men who come here with good intentions and find out they've stepped into a den of wolves.

It's why I've taken to lurking most of the time (and mostly stick to Video Games and sometime OT.) In this section, specifically, so many threads get so hostile, so quickly, it's exhausting to try to read through, and completely uninviting to try to respond. I go long stretches without visiting General, and avoid Ask a Model completely because of this. I stay around because I like the people in this community, and I hope that it'll get better. So far, though, no dice.

 

[HiGirlsRHot]

Since I guess creating 100 fake account to thank Aella's post would piss off the admins.
Let me just say
Thank you, Thank you,Thank you, Thank You, Thank you, Thank You, Thank you, Thank you,Thank you, Thank You, Thank you, Thank You,
Mahalo, Mahalo, Mahalo, Mahalo, Mahalo,Mahalo, Mahalo, Mahalo, Mahalo, Mahalo,
Spasibo,Spasibo,Spasibo,Spasibo,Spasibo, Spasibo,Spasibo,Spasibo,Spasibo,Spasibo,
Merci,Merci, Merci, Merci, Merci,Merci,Merci, Merci, Merci, Merci,
sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun, sağ olun,
Grazie, Grazie, Grazie, Grazie, Grazie,Grazie, Grazie, Grazie, Grazie, Grazie,
xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie, xie xie,
Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,Mauruuru,
Danke, Danke, Danke, Danke, Danke,Danke, Danke, Danke, Danke, Danke,
Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias,Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias, Muchas Gracias,

 

[eclipse76]

It is ok for a man to feel what he wants and want what he wants. You shouldn't shame him for having desires. You shouldn't shame anyone for anything unless it actually hurts someone, and in this case especially there is absolutely no evidence that harm is being done.

Except it's not really what's happening here.
He says he wants the same things as in real life: specifically he wants straight women, as in "no bisexual women". Not harm is done, sure, but in real life, I'd call him a biphobic piece of shit.
And the "single" is just an usual redflag, as in many guys takes cam site for dating website, hence the wariness about it.

I've noticed a trend where a gang of girls attack men on this forum for posting questions, specifically newcomers. It really disgusts me and I wonder where the attitude of tolerance and love went. Reading this just makes me feel really sympathetic and sorry for some of the men who come here with good intentions and find out they've stepped into a den of wolves.

I'd usually agree with you, c.f. the defensive attitude anytime a man states a personal preference, for example about short hair, tattoos, or grooming, it seems a lot of women take it as a global attack on their gender. But it's not the case here.

 

[Gen]

I don't think it makes him a piece of shit :? And to be honest I agree with Aella about the single thing when guys ask to meet up; I get asked that a lot (like I assume most girls do, especially since some sites advertise on dating sites), and 95% of people who ask drop it after you say "sorry, no". The ones who don't drop it are jerks for badgering on about it, but not for asking in my opinion.

I think you're missing out on a ton of lovely ladies by only viewing single girls, but whatever floats your boat. The same could be said for any attribute, really - are guys who don't like BBWs missing out on my totally awesome & great personality? Well, yes, but MFC is a visual medium and if my look isn't what turns their crank, then it's not really missing out. If taken ladies are a turn off for you, then that's your thing and rock on with it.

 

[JoleneBrody]

As far as the Internet is concerned this forum is a very sane place, especially is such an insane industry. It brings together two different ends that often have a hard time relating to or understanding the other side, and allows them the interact and learn from each other... In the end making the overall community better and stronger.

While I agree with the general sentiment of Aella, I disagree on a few points if I'm understanding correctly. It is defensive here on both sides and rightfully so, both sides need defending to find common ground.

People are hurt very badly every day by the misunderstanding of cam sites. A very large percentage of people that stumble onto MFC do so with zero previous knowledge of our industry and are dupped, or dupe themselves into very serious heartbreak. Op seems like he knows what he's doing and as I've previously said, I only care about what I think is unessicary site change... But to say no one gets hurt by the over all general idea of seeking something more than cyber fun on a cam site seems wrong to me. I could be mistaken but I HAVE seen friends, both models and members be very hurt by something that could have been avoided by a little bit of reality and knowledge regarding cam sites and emotions.

If this thread helps remind even one person to keep their wits about them and avoid heartache then, right on.

 

[Aella]

It is ok for a man to feel what he wants and want what he wants. You shouldn't shame him for having desires. You shouldn't shame anyone for anything unless it actually hurts someone, and in this case especially there is absolutely no evidence that harm is being done.

Except it's not really what's happening here.
He says he wants the same things as in real life: specifically he wants straight women, as in "no bisexual women". Not harm is done, sure, but in real life, I'd call him a biphobic piece of shit.
And the "single" is just an usual redflag, as in many guys takes cam site for dating website, hence the wariness about it.

I've noticed a trend where a gang of girls attack men on this forum for posting questions, specifically newcomers. It really disgusts me and I wonder where the attitude of tolerance and love went. Reading this just makes me feel really sympathetic and sorry for some of the men who come here with good intentions and find out they've stepped into a den of wolves.

I'd usually agree with you, c.f. the defensive attitude anytime a man states a personal preference, for example about short hair, tattoos, or grooming, it seems a lot of women take it as a global attack on their gender. But it's not the case here.

Dude. Not being interested in bisexual women is not biphobic. It's simply not being sexually attracted to someone with a certain preference. I am not attracted to gay men and that does not make me a biphobic piece of shit. We don't have to be attracted to everyone all the time. He is allowed to be attracted to whatever the fuck he wants for any reason, and much as you don't want to be called a piece of shit for your sexual preferences, I doubt he wants to be called a piece of shit for his.

Single 'can' be a red flag, if combined with other behaviors that seem alarming. But this guy exhibited none of those. He was rational, explained why he liked it, and did absolutely not deserve the reaction he got.

 

[JoleneBrody]

It is ok for a man to feel what he wants and want what he wants. You shouldn't shame him for having desires. You shouldn't shame anyone for anything unless it actually hurts someone, and in this case especially there is absolutely no evidence that harm is being done.

Except it's not really what's happening here.
He says he wants the same things as in real life: specifically he wants straight women, as in "no bisexual women". Not harm is done, sure, but in real life, I'd call him a biphobic piece of shit.
And the "single" is just an usual redflag, as in many guys takes cam site for dating website, hence the wariness about it.

I've noticed a trend where a gang of girls attack men on this forum for posting questions, specifically newcomers. It really disgusts me and I wonder where the attitude of tolerance and love went. Reading this just makes me feel really sympathetic and sorry for some of the men who come here with good intentions and find out they've stepped into a den of wolves.

I'd usually agree with you, c.f. the defensive attitude anytime a man states a personal preference, for example about short hair, tattoos, or grooming, it seems a lot of women take it as a global attack on their gender. But it's not the case here.

Dude. Not being interested in bisexual women is not biphobic. It's simply not being sexually attracted to someone with a certain preference. I am not attracted to gay men and that does not make me a biphobic piece of shit. We don't have to be attracted to everyone all the time. He is allowed to be attracted to whatever the fuck he wants for any reason, and much as you don't want to be called a piece of shit for your sexual preferences, I doubt he wants to be called a piece of shit for his.

Single 'can' be a red flag, if combined with other behaviors that seem alarming. But this guy exhibited none of those. He was rational, explained why he liked it, and did absolutely not deserve the reaction he got.

Just quoting to second mostly. His preferences seem kind of silly to me but dude is far from a piece if shit, and that was pretty unfair and mean.

I'm turned off by men with men sexually as well, without judgment. That doesn't make me a piece of shit.

 

[HiGirlsRHot]

As far as the Internet is concerned this forum is a very sane place, especially is such an insane industry. It brings together two different ends that often have a hard time relating to or understanding the other side, and allows them the interact and learn from each other... In the end making the overall community better and stronger.

This was my hope what the forum should be also. Sadly I think it falls short more often than not, and so my attitude is a lot like Zippypinhead. I find myself afraid to post my opinion because good chance I will be misunderstood and attacked, so I generally avoid controversial topics.

But honestly this is one of those that shouldn't have been.

If the Op had said I wish there was a way for me to find blonde, bbw, models who did anal, I doubt there would have been a firestorm.
It isn't like adding compound terms to search engine requires a PHd in rocket science. If I type in blonde, anal, bbw into MFC search I get no results. Yet I find dozens to hundreds of models that are blonde, OR BBW, OR have anal in their rooms topics. So finding ones that are all 3 could be time consuming.

Now on my long wish list of features I'd like see MFC add this isn't near the top. However, it is certainly worthy of discussion and while some members addressed the OPs questions, almost no models did. So the only learning that took place for me is that some models are really sensitive about querying their relationship status. I already knew that actually asking a model in a chat room if she was single was taboo, but now I know that running database query is also off limits. :naughty:

 

[Fay_Galore]

am I the only one who thinks some sort of catagory-function would actually be a good idea?

of course, TS looking for a single girl might be debatable (as we've seen in this topic, haha) but I've been saying something along those lines even since I joined MFC.
makes complete sense and could benefit 97% of the girls. (only very high rated models who just happen to get there more by change then by originality might suffer a bit)

 

[IsabellaSnow]

I'm not really going to bother getting into the whether this dude is looking for a relationship etc, or even make him feel bad for wanting to find girls in his preferences, I just want to point out a few things:

Firstly, to the OP, the girls who have expressed desires to meet you. I wouldn't let your head bloat up too much about that. I say with almost certainty that if you had pursued these girls with the idea of meeting that it would not have led to anything. Yes, cam girls do sometimes date members, but this is rare and unlikely for it to happen to a cam girl, for it to happen to a member it's a seriously low chance. Many models, especially if you are getting close to and tipping girls in the single variety, might occasionally toy with the idea of meeting their members. This does not mean they'd ever go through with it. If I wanted to meet a member I would make it happen, I wouldn't toy around with the idea or simply suggest it. If I'm just mentioning an interest then I'm not being serious and am just musing on the possibility. Don't read into it too much. Some models actually use this as ways to draw their members in and make them spend more. It's like going to prostitutes and them moaning loads and acting like it's amazing and telling you nice things after and you then thinking you're amazing in bed and that those girls would totally do it for free if you pursued the idea. Get the ego boost from it sure, but separate fantasy from reality.

And secondly, one of the large points of myfreecams, which makes it different from streamate, is that it's personality based as much as looks based. Looks may be the initial draw, but with myfreecams it tends to mostly be about persona. Those single, straight, white girls with no tattoos could be really dull to you, whilst a girl who's bi curious or has a tiny tattoo somewhere on her body might be someone who you'd find amazing to hang out with. The difference between streamate and MFC is that on streamate members tend to turn up cock in hand and simply want to see a show. On MFC members also want to see a show, but they also want to see the live entertainment and the personality of the girl. Most of the guys who tip are just as interested, if not more interested, in the socilisation than they are in the shows. It's this socialisation opportunity which makes myfreecams most of its money. Limiting your search to those few girls could stop you from visiting another girl who's in a relationship who you might love and spend tons of money on.

Also, Streamate sometimes advertises itself as a dating site even though it's not. I think with most members they like the idea of a model being single and would probably put that in. Many members are also probably thinking of watching a fairly young model, but the model they might like might actually be 30, if they'd searched they would have missed her. It means that many members would put single and under 30 into the search without even really thinking, meaning the models in relationships and over 30 would miss out on a ton of exposure.
I understand searching for region as language and accents are quite a big deal in general entertainment, more so than looks, age or relationship status, but I think even those searches can limit the site opportunities, if the search function went overboard I think it'd change the dynamics of the site.

For the "boyfriend looking over her shoulder" comment. I very much doubt any camgirl who's in a relationship has the kind of boyfriend who'll be looking over her shoulder. I doubt things would change at all. I've cammed both in and out of relationships and I think I'm probably a better camgirl while in one. The only differences I'd say is when out of a relationship I probably am more likely to muse on ideas of dating members (though very unlikely it'd ever happen), and in a relationship I probably spend less time chatting offline, though in my experience that difference was minimal. I've never had a boyfriend look over my shoulder or get involved with camming. I also don't do boy/girl videos, though you do know, if you're watching a girl with boy/girl vids you don't have to purchase or watch those videos and those videos may also not be from a current boyfriend. What about single girls who have sex vids out there? Do you not like the idea of a single girl you're watching getting laid or going out on dates in her free time?

 

[eclipse76]

Dude. Not being interested in bisexual women is not biphobic. It's simply not being sexually attracted to someone with a certain preference

From a dating point of view, there's no difference between a straight woman (or other genders) and a bisexual woman, it doesn't change anything about their character ; you meet someone, everything goes well, but they tell you they are bisexual, would you suddenly be reluctant to dating them? It's akin to reproach a woman for her sexual history in my opinion, “wow, you dated women before me? Eww, sorry, can't date you, I'm not sexually attracted to you anymore”.
Of course, I agree no one should be forced to date anyone because of X preferences they have, but such preference in that case is a tad discriminatory.

 

[Joeternal]

I'm sorry for calling you lame OP. That wasn't very nice of me.

No big deal. I've had much worse things said about me, especially on the internet.

 

[mynameisbob84]

Dude. Not being interested in bisexual women is not biphobic. It's simply not being sexually attracted to someone with a certain preference

From a dating point of view, there's no difference between a straight woman (or other genders) and a bisexual woman, it doesn't change anything about their character ; you meet someone, everything goes well, but they tell you they are bisexual, would you suddenly be reluctant to dating them? It's akin to reproach a woman for her sexual history in my opinion, “wow, you dated women before me? Eww, sorry, can't date you, I'm not sexually attracted to you anymore”.
Of course, I agree no one should be forced to date anyone because of X preferences they have, but such preference in that case is a tad discriminatory.

You're trying to apply logic to something that isn't governed by logic. People don't get to sit down and decide what or who they're attracted to or what turns them on. Not being attracted to bisexual women is not discrimination. No more so than a homosexual man not being attracted to straight women is. It might not be logical, but that's irrelevant. If the OP were to state that he looked down on bisexual women, that he believed they were lesser people, then yes, that would be discrimination. But not wishing to fuck or jerk off to them? Not so much.

I don't think there's anything wrong with the OP's suggestion of an improved search function on MFC. I think the only reason the majority of models here were so quick to poo poo the idea was because they don't want members to approach MFC as a dating site, which many members would undoubtedly do, were there an option to filter out models who weren't single.

One thing I can't help but wonder is how many of the models who would be against members viewing MFC as a dating site (in general, not specifically the models in this thread), are the same models who claim to be single despite being in a relationship.

 

[Joeternal]

Some models actually use this as ways to draw their members in and make them spend more.

Right. Which is the main reason why I haven't pursued it, even though the models in question didn't give me any reason to believe they were trying to scam me. It would be a big leap of faith on my part. Distrust in this situation is a two way street.

 

[AmberCutie]

I've just gotten to catch up with all the posts in here.

Joeternal, sorry that your post immediately got derailed into what it became. I understand and appreciate the desire for better search function. While I am married and feel I can still be very entertaining and fun to chat with, I don't take offense to the fact that I am not your criteria, and neither should any other girls. But they are allowed to feel they way they do, and so are you.

Edited to add: while I believe that everyone is entitled to feel how they do, it is upsetting to me the way this thread went. I agree with Aella that the "den of wolves" could get really off-putting to newcomers.

 

[Joeternal]

But to say no one gets hurt by the over all general idea of seeking something more than cyber fun on a cam site seems wrong to me. I could be mistaken but I HAVE seen friends, both models and members be very hurt by something that could have been avoided by a little bit of reality and knowledge regarding cam sites and emotions.

If this thread helps remind even one person to keep their wits about them and avoid heartache then, right on.

There have been a couple of times where I have felt bad, because a model and I got very close, and then I backed away, and she seemed to be genuinely hurt by it. It wasn't because she was defective in any way. It was other factors, things going on in my life, and my general apprehension about meeting somebody on a cam site. But the thing is, that kind of thing happens in life, regardless of whether or not you're on a cam site. So I don't think any blanket statement applies to the situation. Like I said about myself, I'm hesitant, but it could happen.

 

[JoleneBrody]

As far as the Internet is concerned this forum is a very sane place, especially is such an insane industry. It brings together two different ends that often have a hard time relating to or understanding the other side, and allows them the interact and learn from each other... In the end making the overall community better and stronger.

This was my hope what the forum should be also. Sadly I think it falls short more often than not, and so my attitude is a lot like Zippypinhead. I find myself afraid to post my opinion because good chance I will be misunderstood and attacked, so I generally avoid controversial topics.

But honestly this is one of those that shouldn't have been.

If the Op had said I wish there was a way for me to find blonde, bbw, models who did anal, I doubt there would have been a firestorm.
It isn't like adding compound terms to search engine requires a PHd in rocket science. If I type in blonde, anal, bbw into MFC search I get no results. Yet I find dozens to hundreds of models that are blonde, OR BBW, OR have anal in their rooms topics. So finding ones that are all 3 could be time consuming.

Now on my long wish list of features I'd like see MFC add this isn't near the top. However, it is certainly worthy of discussion and while some members addressed the OPs questions, almost no models did. So the only learning that took place for me is that some models are really sensitive about querying their relationship status. I already knew that actually asking a model in a chat room if she was single was taboo, but now I know that running database query is also off limits. :naughty:

I genuinely had NO idea that you could not search multiple tags at once... I thought this whole thing was about easy predetermines check boxes vs. typing out tags that models can chose themselves...
I'm a little embarrassed. I'm very sorry, now that I look back that was pretty obvious and I wasn't seeing it through my sour grumpy sick mood yesterday.
I apologize. I was wrong.