As far as I know, all the Smartz crew make it clear BEFORE
any pvt/group session that they are non-nude models. Whenever I see a girl with Smartz on her nickname, I already know she won't go nude. Now, if they have a special contract, it must be between them and Suzy, not with MFC. If yes and the girl wants to go nude, they should reach a deal. Although I don't think such contract can have any legal value.
I know that Blaire - also non-nude - is a friend of Suzy, but she does not have the "Smartz" on her nickname. I don't know how these girls define "non-nude", but Blaire shows nipples in pvt/group. Like flashing for 2 or 3 seconds, but she does.
If Suzy is forbidding the girls from going nude, it makes no sense. Suzy is a non-nude model and she is honest enough to make it clear. But if a friend of hers wants to go nude... Let the bird fly.
Unless... Suzy might be trying to create a brand - the Smartz girls. A group of girls that never go nude. Well, she kinda created already. So, in this case, she is making sure that none of her girls get naked. And she might have a deal (not a contract) with MFC to only allow her girls to have "Smartz" on the nickname.Note
: I visited Suzy's room 2 or 3 times and I never talked to her. So, the last paragraph is just a theory based on what I have seen happening on other camsites.
Well, if they're not going to get naked within the first 60 seconds models are supposed to say so.
I think this rule does not exist anymore. I remember a Latvian girl arguing with me that there is nothing saying that she must get naked or say she won't do it within 1 minute. Of course, she was not telling anybody that she was a non-nude model. I searched for it on wiki.myfreecams, and indeed, there is nothing about it anymore.