Nordling said:
Which from the sparse story appears to be what happened. A small group of bullies, knew about a planned wedding, and waited until the last moment (a day before) to scream their nasty garbage thinking there was a good chance that no one would want to start a fight this close to the actual event. To me, this is why the pastor should not be the leader of any church; he doesn't have the backbone to stand up to bullies and bigots.
Now, every day of their marriage this innocent couple will have to think about how a handfull of fucktards forced them to change their plans on their wedding day. Which is the bigger deal? Simply having a wedding but one blotted by asswipes, or maybe postpone the whole thing, and have a "perfect" wedding later?
I think after ~150 years, it's time to stand up to the village idiots, not just give in because of momentary CONVENIENCE.
And I am saying I'll take the convenience for myself (not having to reschedule especially if people are traveling from a long way away) in the short run and then take their asses to the cleaners. And like I said, we don't know if they pastor forced them to move it, suggested they move it, or simply offered it as an option. I don't support blaming him when there just aren't enough details.
He may have wimped out but maybe he didn't. The only people CLEARLY in the wrong were those bigoted church members. I believe the story even mentioned that members of the church council did not support what had happened so HOPEFULLY the ones who caused this problem will be removed from the church.