How does Stripchat handle reports involving sexual assault or non-consensual content?

[hideto714]

Hi everyone,


I recently watched a Stripchat stream that I found extremely disturbing. The broadcast took place in a public men’s restroom, and the situation escalated into what appeared to be a sexual assault, where two men touched the performer without her consent. The stream then promoted a ticket show that seemed to continue this situation with content suggesting sexual violence.


I reported the stream because I believe this type of content is unacceptable. However, this is the first time I’ve encountered something like this on the platform, so I have no idea whether my report will actually lead to any action. That’s why I’m posting here: I’d like to know how Stripchat handles reports involving possible sexual assault or non-consensual acts.


I’m also concerned that this kind of highly provocative content appears to attract a very large audience. My worry is that the pressure to gain views and income may encourage some performers to take increasingly dangerous risks, to the point where the line between provocative entertainment and real danger becomes blurred.


I want to make it clear that I feel sorry for the performer, who, from what I observed, appeared to be the victim in this situation. My intention is not to blame her, but to understand how Stripchat protects performers when situations involving possible sexual assault or non-consensual acts occur during a broadcast.


Has anyone here ever reported similar content? Did Stripchat respond or take action? I’d appreciate hearing about your experiences.

 

[droopla]

It's role play and it is consensual

I’m also concerned that this kind of highly provocative content appears to attract a very large audience. My worry is that the pressure to gain views and income may encourage some performers to take increasingly dangerous risks, to the point where the line between provocative entertainment and real danger becomes blurred.

This may be so but it also states that it is consensual
The models know what they are doing and it's often even scripted

I’m also concerned that this kind of highly provocative content appears to attract a very large audience.

it's a fetish , and if you don't like that fetish just move on

 

[Natural9]

It's role play and it is consensual



This may be so but it also states that it is consensual
The models know what they are doing and it's often even scripted



it's a fetish , and if you don't like that fetish just move on

Even if it is a "fetish" it is very strange to make a fetish out of non consensual sex. Commonly referred to as rape. Defending rapists and pedophiles sounds like the current administration and the republican party. Drawing a very fine line it seems

 

[Vixxen81]

Even if it is a "fetish" it is very strange to make a fetish out of non consensual sex. Commonly referred to as rape. Defending rapists and pedophiles sounds like the current administration and the republican party. Drawing a very fine line it seems

That would get everyone involved permanently banned on CB, especially the in public part.

 

[droopla]

Even if it is a "fetish" it is very strange to make a fetish out of non consensual sex. Commonly referred to as rape. Defending rapists and pedophiles sounds like the current administration and the republican party. Drawing a very fine line it seems

i don't know why pedophiles and politics suddenly appear and it got nothing to do with this

The fetish is rough sex and don't only look at it from one side , some like to give it and some like to receive it

just as spanking , if it's non-consensual it's torture , if it's consensual it can be fun , for both

 

[Natural9]

i don't know why pedophiles and politics suddenly appear and it got nothing to do with this

The fetish is rough sex and don't only look at it from one side , some like to give it and some like to receive it

just as spanking , if it's non-consensual it's torture , if it's consensual it can be fun , for both

But it is not portrayed as "consensual". Why make it appear non consensual instead of just portraying rough sex? The people watching are getting into the "fetish" you described in your first post as "non consensual" There are rooms that openly state they are all about "rough sex"

 

[yummybrownfox]

Even if it is a "fetish" it is very strange to make a fetish out of non consensual sex. Commonly referred to as rape. Defending rapists and pedophiles sounds like the current administration and the republican party. Drawing a very fine line it seems

This. And in a men's public restroom other men and BOYS could walk in at any moment. Men and BOYS who didn't consent to appearing live on a sex site, which is absolutely not okay...just for some model to make a few bucks and gain new followers. These men and BOYS just go in there expecting to take a piss or shit, flush, (hopefully) wash their hands, and walk right out. I have a 23-year old son, and I'd be PISSED if I found out that he made an unexpected, unwanted appearance on someone's live roleplay show on an adult site that several people may be watching/recording. Whatever naughty, risky thing models are doing on live cam to keep their audience interested...leave non-consenting people out of that shit.

 

[droopla]

But it is not portrayed as "consensual". Why make it appear non consensual instead of just portraying rough sex? The people watching are getting into the "fetish" you described in your first post as "non consensual" There are rooms that openly state they are all about "rough sex"

it's about how you see it , you are not on some shady darkweb site , they are models and actors

This. And in a men's public restroom other men and BOYS could walk in at any moment. Men and BOYS who didn't consent to appearing live on a sex site, which is absolutely not okay...just for some model to make a few bucks and gain new followers. These men and BOYS just go in there expecting to take a piss or shit, flush, (hopefully) wash their hands, and walk right out. I have a 23-year old son, and I'd be PISSED if I found out that he made an unexpected, unwanted appearance on someone's live roleplay show on an adult site that several people may be watching/recording. Whatever naughty, risky thing models are doing on live cam to keep their audience interested...leave non-consenting people out of that shit.

that's also a fetish but don;t worry about people who don't want to be on a sex site
only the finger of a non registered user will result in a non reversible ban .

 

[Natural9]

it's about how you see it , you are not on some shady darkweb site , they are models and actors



that's also a fetish but don;t worry about people who don't want to be on a sex site
only the finger of a non registered user will result in a non reversible ban .

No it is not about "how you see it" .. It is about how it is portrayed and "sold" to those thinking rape is a "normal" fetish in any way, shape. or form.

 

[yummybrownfox]

it's about how you see it , you are not on some shady darkweb site , they are models and actors



that's also a fetish but don;t worry about people who don't want to be on a sex site
only the finger of a non registered user will result in a non reversible ban .

What are you talking about? Sounds like you're a friend and/or fan of this model, and are making excuses. Stop trying to justify the shit. *Cringe*

 

[Stella_SC]

Hello @hideto714

Thank you for reporting the incident. All reports are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated. If a violation of our rules is found, then appropriate consequences will be delivered to the performers on that account.

 

[Stella_SC]

Hello @yummybrownfox

We have strict rules stating that unregistered users are not allowed to appear in the background of a model's broadcast. This requirement exists to protect everyone's privacy and to ensure that all individuals appearing on camera have consented to being broadcast and have completed the necessary age and identity verification.

If an unregistered individual does appear on camera, even momentarily or partially, it may result in serious moderation action on that model's account.

 

[AmberCutie]

Hello @yummybrownfox

We have strict rules stating that unregistered users are not allowed to appear in the background of a model's broadcast. This requirement exists to protect everyone's privacy and to ensure that all individuals appearing on camera have consented to being broadcast and have completed the necessary age and identity verification.

If an unregistered individual does appear on camera, even momentarily or partially, it may result in serious moderation action on that model's account.

Forgive me stepping in to speak on behalf of @yummybrownfox but I think it's obvious that she was criticizing the performer's lack of care for others, in the case that she really WAS in a public space, as that would be a gross violation of privacy for people using the public restroom. I am sure she is well aware that your site (as do all/most) has a policy to ban models who would allow unregistered users to appear on their stream, but it doesn't change the fact that the act could happen to begin with (again, if it IS actually a public space where strangers COULD appear.)

I know you've got a lot on your plate dealing with issues that arise on the forum, but I think you may have misread @yummybrownfox's post, so just wanted to make sure that was cleared up. We cam models don't like it when other cam models do things that appear so careless, it does a disservice to us all.

 

[yummybrownfox]

Hello @yummybrownfox

We have strict rules stating that unregistered users are not allowed to appear in the background of a model's broadcast. This requirement exists to protect everyone's privacy and to ensure that all individuals appearing on camera have consented to being broadcast and have completed the necessary age and identity verification.

If an unregistered individual does appear on camera, even momentarily or partially, it may result in serious moderation action on that model's account.

Hi. I'm not sure why you're telling me this? I know the rules. I'm not the one breaking the rules and being reckless. The model who allegedly did this is the person you should be having this conversation with, and reminding her of the rules.

Forgive me stepping in to speak on behalf of @yummybrownfox but I think it's obvious that she was criticizing the performer's lack of care for others, in the case that she really WAS in a public space, as that would be a gross violation of privacy for people using the public restroom. I am sure she is well aware that your site (as do all/most) has a policy to ban models who would allow unregistered users to appear on their stream, but it doesn't change the fact that the act could happen to begin with (again, if it IS actually a public space where strangers COULD appear.)

I know you've got a lot on your plate dealing with issues that arise on the forum, but I think you may have misread @yummybrownfox's post, so just wanted to make sure that was cleared up. We cam models don't like it when other cam models do things that appear so careless, it does a disservice to us all.

Exactly. THANK YOU, Amber!

 

[Stella_SC]

Hello @yummybrownfox

My apologies if my post came across in a way that I did not intend. I felt it was important to provide this information for anyone following the discussion, and I addressed my response to you simply because you were the one that raised the topic about unregistered people in the background (whereas the OP was discussing consent). I did not mean to imply in any way that you were the one breaking the rules or not understanding them .