Has anyone else ever had the impression, that Stripchat doesn't read what users write, when they report a model? Usually you get an answer within minutes 'no violation found', even if you describe exactly what the case is. Also appeal doesn't help. They always 'carfully review' and find .... nothing.
AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
Fraud on StripChat
- Thread starter fraud_detector
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
I understand how this can feel frustrating, especially when responses come through quickly. Our moderation team operates 24/7 across different time zones, which is why reports are often reviewed within minutes.
All reports and appeals are carefully reviewed - they’re not ignored- but not every case results in a violation being confirmed. In some situations, what may appear to be a violation doesn’t fall outside of our Terms of Service for models, which are publicly available.
If you feel strongly about a specific case, you’re welcome to submit a report again through Stripchat directly or our Support team with as much detail as possible so the team can take another look.
All reports and appeals are carefully reviewed - they’re not ignored- but not every case results in a violation being confirmed. In some situations, what may appear to be a violation doesn’t fall outside of our Terms of Service for models, which are publicly available.
If you feel strongly about a specific case, you’re welcome to submit a report again through Stripchat directly or our Support team with as much detail as possible so the team can take another look.
Upvote
0
Thank you for the quick reply, but with all due respect, that is exactly the generic response I've received many times before. It doesn't address the core issue.
My point isn't about 'frustration' with speed – it's about content integrity. When I provide technical evidence of pre-recorded video sequences being sold as 'Live,' a 1-minute 'careful review' that results in 'no violation' suggests that either the moderation tools are inadequate or that selling non-live content as live is actually permitted under your Terms of Service (which it isn’t as far as I’ve learned, why else should this be a topic in the menu under the reporting function?).
I was mainly interested in hearing if other users have experienced this same 'brick wall' when reporting clear cases of non-live material. If the official advice is just 'report it again' (which has already failed multiple times), then it seems the system for ensuring 'Live' integrity is effectively broken. I'm moving past the support tickets now and looking for a broader community perspective on this.
Upvote
0
I hear what you’re saying, and I understand the distinction you’re making here.
You’re not really talking about response speed, you’re questioning whether cases like this are being evaluated deeply enough- especially when you’re providing specific examples. That’s fair feedback, we appreciate it.
I can’t go into individual reports publicly, but I will take this back to the team so it can be reviewed from that angle.
If you’re open to it, feel free to DM me a couple of the examples you mentioned. That would really help us take a closer look at what you’re seeing and understand where the disconnect might be.
Appreciate you explaining it further. That context actually helps a lot.
Upvote
0
I appreciate your openness, but the reason I’m posting here is that the private support/appeal route has already failed multiple times. Despite providing technical evidence of synchronized, pre-recorded video sequences, the outcome was always a generic 'no violation'.
This points to a systemic issue regarding content integrity. I’ve even looked into your own 'Researcher Application' regarding the EU Digital Services Act (DSA), and it’s a bit ironic to read about 'transparency' and 'risk mitigation' when clear evidence of non-live content is being ignored in practice.
For me, this isn't about individual tickets anymore – t's about whether 'Live' is an honest product description or just a marketing term. I am currently structuring a comprehensive report on these patterns to better illustrate this 'disconnect' and might share key findings later.
By the way, as I'm looking for a broader community perspective on this, I kindly ask the admin to move this thread to the General Cam/Creator Chat
@AmberCutie please!
since I accidentally posted it here in the unofficial support section where reach is limited. Looking forward to hearing more from other users there!
Upvote
0
Just to give an example of such an account that streams the same videos again and again (for more than a year):
On the left a screenshot from the day I found that model, in the middle one from three weeks before (what I mentioned when I reported it!) and on the right an overlay of both photos to show that it's the exact same scene from the same video (just not the same frame).
Why does the Stripchat moderation team not detect such fraud?
On the left a screenshot from the day I found that model, in the middle one from three weeks before (what I mentioned when I reported it!) and on the right an overlay of both photos to show that it's the exact same scene from the same video (just not the same frame).
Why does the Stripchat moderation team not detect such fraud?
Upvote
0
Why don’t you just share the info with the SC rep as they requested? That way they can investigate further and hopefully fix any issues.
Then come back here and post your observations. Posting stuff on here isn’t going to get you anywhere.
Upvote
0
Maxi, that's what I already did – it never leads to anything. I just wanted to see, if other users have made similar experiences
Upvote
0
Maxi, that's what I already did – it never leads to anything. I just wanted to see, if other users have made similar experiences
I know, but all you’ve done is post two similar images claiming they were taken weeks apart that absolutely no one can verify.
A real, live SC rep has reached out ask for further info. Common sense says that’s the best route to take.
Upvote
0
I get your point, Maxi, and in a perfect world, that would be the best route. But the reality is: Stripchat has already received these exact images, timestamps, and full technical logs via their official channels multiple times.
The fact that identical videos on several accounts are still being sold as 'Live' despite being flagged isn't a lack of information – it’s a lack of action.
I’m not posting this to get a 'fix' for one specific account anymore. I’m sharing this to show that even with clear evidence, the current moderation system seems to hit a dead end. When 'Live' content is indistinguishable from a recording and the platform's response is a generic 'no violation,' it’s a conversation that belongs in the community, not just in a private DM.
The fact that identical videos on several accounts are still being sold as 'Live' despite being flagged isn't a lack of information – it’s a lack of action.
I’m not posting this to get a 'fix' for one specific account anymore. I’m sharing this to show that even with clear evidence, the current moderation system seems to hit a dead end. When 'Live' content is indistinguishable from a recording and the platform's response is a generic 'no violation,' it’s a conversation that belongs in the community, not just in a private DM.
Upvote
0
I won’t post specific model names here, as 'Naming & Shaming' is against the forum rules I guess and would only give the admin a reason to delete this entire discussion.
Besides, the issue isn't about me proving anything to you, Maxi. It’s about the fact that Stripchat already has these names, the logs, and the reports – and they chose to do nothing.
If you're a regular user, you've likely seen these '24/7 video streams' yourself. If you’re looking for 'proof,' just keep an eye on some 'Live' shows for a few days; the patterns of pre-recorded content are hard to miss once you stop looking away.
Upvote
0
It’s a bit convenient to call 'bullshit' just because I refuse to break forum rules by naming models publicly. My point was never to convince you personally, Maxi – it’s about highlighting a documented system failure.
This lack of integrity affects everyone: not only the paying users but also the many hard-working, truly 'live' models who have to compete against 24/7 pre-recorded videos.
If you choose to ignore these patterns, that's your prerogative, but it doesn't change the facts. Cheers.
Upvote
0
Then as suggested, send your 'facts' to the SC Reps here who have offered to look into it - example is reply #4 above.
Upvote
0
Maybe you didn't read the full thread? I'm interested in experiences of other users, not in trying to get into a reporting loop again. It's not about one specific account, it's many of them. The reporting system seems to be designed to discourage users from using it – in 95% of cases it is useless.
Upvote
0
I just wanted to jump in again and let you know I’m here to help with this.
I completely understand your concerns, and I’d really like to work through this with you. To move things forward, I’ll just need your help with the next steps I mentioned earlier.
If you’re open to that, feel free to share the details here or send me a DM and we can take a closer look together
I completely understand your concerns, and I’d really like to work through this with you. To move things forward, I’ll just need your help with the next steps I mentioned earlier.
If you’re open to that, feel free to share the details here or send me a DM and we can take a closer look together
Upvote
0
Maybe I did. The bigger picture here shouldn't be about creating a thread to encourage other users to pile on and agree with you, it should be about you passing on to the SC Reps here the specific examples that you believe had been reviewed after reporting, so that they can follow up. If the reports were reviewed and the outcome of that is then reconsidered, it can help the process get better and take appropriate action in more examples of the same acts.
Continuous improvement, not continuous complaining. Right?
Upvote
0
There's an alternative here. Stop reporting and concerning yourself with things the site itself has declared are not worth concern. Easy-peasy.
Upvote
0
It is disgusting to share nudes of someone especially in an open forum. No matter what they did imho this is illegal.
Upvote
0
To clarify: These are publicly available screenshots of a public broadcast used as evidence of a systemic technical issue, not 'private nudes.' If providing proof of fraud is seen as more 'disgusting' than the fraud itself, that says a lot about your priorities.
Upvote
0
Actually, 'easy-peasy' would be to just stop using the platform entirely. But that’s exactly the problem: it’s a loss for everyone involved – especially for the hard-working, truly 'live' models who lose out to these 24/7 videos.
If we just accept that 'Live' doesn't mean live anymore, the platform loses its core value. I don’t think ignoring systemic deception is a long-term solution for a healthy community.
Upvote
0
That doesn't work here, sorry:I just wanted to jump in again and let you know I’m here to help with this.
I completely understand your concerns, and I’d really like to work through this with you. To move things forward, I’ll just need your help with the next steps I mentioned earlier.
If you’re open to that, feel free to share the details here or send me a DM and we can take a closer look together
'You may not send a direct message to the following recipients: Elira_SC.'
Upvote
0
Similar threads
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Question