I just wish to check the browsing history of the writer of this two dime blog, I wonder how many free loading times on tubes will be there, and in which categories...
Here's the writer's site: https://katefustich.com/Sigh...
I am AmberCutie. This forum is AmberCutie's Forum (ACF). Some day, people will learn how to credit that. You don't "go to ambercutie" to post stuff. You go to her damn forum.
Totally amateur writer, here.
"I was on AmberCutie the other day and read xyz". No, no you were not ON ME. Dammit it's such a pet peeve.
Am I the only one who thinks there wasn't much substance to that article?
"Camgirls get uncomfortable sometimes. Some of their members are pervs. Oh no!"
Okay. And what about it? The one person they talked to, Jessica, didn't honestly sound like she was comfy camming in general. Talking about the weather is creepy? I mean, I guess if I think they'll try to use that info to find my location but it's not creepy in and of itself. A little off topic maybe, but no creepy.
I'll be honest though. Everytime they referred to this as "AmberCutie" I giggled. That's just poor research right there.
It sounds like it was a "hit piece" to give the bible thumpers and the religious-right politicians something to whine about.
I don’t think it was trying to be scientific or like a research article or anything.I rolled my eyes so hard at this bullshit opinion based article. I had to quit reading.
1. I don't like that people are reporting on our work anyway. What is the purpose here other than to clickbait or cause controversy?
2. When they do, it's always grasping for straws trying to skew us in whatever opinion they have.
It's still slut shamey, which is fine. If you're going to do that, conduct a real experiment with real data though, please. When are we going to see serious psychology or sociology experiments that are released to the masses on facebook that are conducted in a true scientific fashion, with true randomization, and most importantly: ENOUGH SAMPLE SIZE!
@Aella needs to start working for buzzfeed or whatever other random company this is. Her surverys are not perfect by any means but her efforts are so much more apparent than any of these hopefully first year graduate 'reporters' writing this garbage based on this 'research'.
Why mention ACF if they didn't even run into Aella's surveys and results?
Real impressive, real impressive.
Folks, this is called BAD SCIENCE.
Naw looking at her twitter and skimming the rest of the stuff she has written, she is a good liberal, I'm sure she considers herself a feminist.
I was a waiter and a bartender for many years, there is a valid point in what you say.Because ya know, there's no other industry where front of house staff make less than the corporations.
Fuck, waitresses deal with as much shit as we do some days (been there,done that), at least we deal with it in an environment that is explicitly sexual on purpose.