Library camgirl busted

[PunkInDrublic]

Yes, camgirls are just normal citizens, we get that. But their is a little extra danger involved with having her personal details out there. A number of camgirls on this forum even have experienced stalkers, death threats, have had to get restraining orders, etc.

You would think that people who have such risks wouldn't put themselves in situations like this. And your comparisons are pretty silly but whatever.

Broadcast yourself committing crimes and then expect to be treated like special little snowflakes, brehs

 

[LilyMarie]

Also, what about the camgirls in TX where it's a misdemeanor to engage in homosexual behavior (g/g shows) or own more than 6 dildos.

Please tell me that's a joke. Though I'm guessing it's probably not

 

[Ann_Sulu]

Also, what about the camgirls in TX where it's a misdemeanor to engage in homosexual behavior (g/g shows) or own more than 6 dildos.

Please tell me that's a joke. Though I'm guessing it's probably not

Most states have at least one weird law like that about sex, especially the further south you get...sadly Google confirms, she's correct.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/05/politics/alcee-hastings-frozen-texas/

If you click one of the links there it'll actually lead to this page on odd sex-related laws.

http://www.lonestarq.com/fact-check-dildos-really-illegal-texas/

 

[mynameisbob84]

The only good thing to come out of this debacle is Cheviju going in to spin overdrive on Twitter, claiming to be happy that Katsumi wasn't banned from MFC because it (somehow) led to this girl being arrested (I guess by giving up on Katsumi, they had more time to devote to complaining about public shows like this one and I think they're somehow taking credit for her arrest, thus making the world a safer place or something). I lol'd.

 

[PunkInDrublic]

Someone should do a quick write up on this Juju person. I keep seeing people here talking about her, seems pretty out there, but not sure when and why she seems to be doing whatever it is she is doing.

 

[mynameisbob84]

Someone should do a quick write up on this Juju person. I keep seeing people here talking about her, seems pretty out there, but not sure when and why she seems to be doing whatever it is she is doing.

Someone posted this on Twitter. It's pretty accurate.



After devoting fuck knows how many hours to digging up everything she could on Katsumi (reported her to the FBI for encouraging pedophilia, went on her local news station to talk about it, dug up years old blog posts that refer to lolicon to post as "evidence", scoured the internet for 10 second videos of her making reference to pedophilia, saw her drinking on cam so dug up her birth certificate, posted it online and reported her to her local sheriff's office for underage drinking, etc. etc.) she finally gave up on that pursuit (I'm guessing the Cease and Desist may have had something to do with it) and moved on to the more vague target of models performing shows in public, again posting videos and real names and locations and talking to the media. Maybe now there's been an arrest, she can kid herself into thinking she was responsible and she'll calm down a bit.

 

[SomeRandomDude]

Maybe now there's been an arrest, she can kid herself into thinking she was responsible and she'll calm down a bit.

In my experience, people of this particular breed do not tend to calm down; in fact they're more likely to calm *up* (I've been waiting for a chance to use that Stargate reference ).

Lmao at that Twitter post, seems accurate. That's some bad juju alright! :-D

Also, that Texas dildo thing just made my weekend! :lol: How can you people live in such a crazy country? At least most laws in Finland make *some* kind of sense, even if they tend to lean on the prudish side.


Imo, lil was bound to get caught at some point, Juju or no Juju (although she did manage to blow this out of all proportion). She wasn't exactly being *subtle* with 50 multiple-hour shows, most in the same library and with a minimum of 2,000 guys watching... That very recklessness kept both her and the tips coming (sorry for this... ). I must confess that when I learned the location of her library due to her carelessness, I myself thought of busting her out. Not for any moral indignation (last time my doctor checked, I had no moral bone in my body), but rather to appease my raging cock-demons, ahem. In the end I didn't do it because I couldn't be sure of the consequences (and I didn't want her to quit doing her shows). I only wanted to see her reaction when she's caught by the librarians. This type of life-mangling witchhunt was never on my agenda (even if it does turn me on, sadly). I guess this is for you lil, if you read this. So... I'm a fiend, but not as fiendish as I might. FWIW (I'm sure it's very little).

Btw, I've wondered this for a while: what exactly is MFC's relation to the site where lil's videos are still for sale? Most vids from most MFC girls can be found there. They're uploaded onto a site called Upstore, but accessed through a few different sites. If MFC in fact owns the vids, then do the models know of it and gain a percentage of sold vids? Or are they being sold without their knowledge or informed consent (how many people read the fine print of every contract they sign, even if they're important ones)? I'm pretty sure the vids are recorded by MFC, because it would be pretty hard for a third party to set up a system where they catch (almost) each and every show of every girl. If this is the case, I wonder why lil didn't ask for her vids to be deleted, in order to get rid of hot evidence? I know of at least one other girl who's done this, so it is in fact possible.

 

[PunkInDrublic]

While moral outrage and public disgrace (of other persons) gives me a tremendous hard-on

I must confess that when I learned the location of her library due to her carelessness, I myself thought of busting her out. Not for any moral indignation (last time my doctor checked, I had no moral bone in my body), but rather to appease my raging cock-demons, ahem.
.

^Why this dude keep talking about his dick tho? I mean, you do you and all but you might want to chill out on all that cock talk.

Juju sounds straight nuts. I don't like public shows either(have I mentioned this here before?) but what she is doing is just ridiculous. That Katsumi stuff is so dumb.

Some state laws are hilarious. I can almost understand the homosexual behavior law, Texas gonna Texas, but the dildo one is funny. Like how do you even decide or come to the conclusion that 6 dildos is the safe amount of dildos that one should own?

 

[Ann_Sulu]

Some state laws are hilarious. I can almost understand the homosexual behavior law, Texas gonna Texas, but the dildo one is funny. Like how do you even decide or come to the conclusion that 6 dildos is the safe amount of dildos that one should own?

Well, for any texans thinking it's bad, it could be worse. According to that map, Arizona is only allowed 2 dildos per household. :roll: :lol:

 

[zippypinhead]

Some state laws are hilarious. I can almost understand the homosexual behavior law, Texas gonna Texas, but the dildo one is funny. Like how do you even decide or come to the conclusion that 6 dildos is the safe amount of dildos that one should own?

Well, for any texans thinking it's bad, it could be worse. According to that map, Arizona is only allowed 2 dildos per household. :roll: :lol:

It would probably be best for everyone to just avoid Arizona. It's full of sun-baked septuagenarian sociopaths.

 

[SomeRandomDude]

^Why this dude keep talking about his dick tho? I mean, you do you and all but you might want to chill out on all that cock talk.

Isn't it obvious? I have a small cock (the rarest sentence in the English language ). Well -- it's not HUGE, ergo it's small. Case closed.

Also, 'you do you'? Having never heard that, I gave a gander to Urban Dictionary, and it has a single definition, from 2009(!). Get with the times, man -- and if this is becoming a thing again, please don't help it along. :hand:

 

[SaffronBurke]

Some state laws are hilarious. I can almost understand the homosexual behavior law, Texas gonna Texas, but the dildo one is funny. Like how do you even decide or come to the conclusion that 6 dildos is the safe amount of dildos that one should own?

Well, for any texans thinking it's bad, it could be worse. According to that map, Arizona is only allowed 2 dildos per household. :roll: :lol:

Note to self: avoid Arizona forever and for always.

Also, WTF, you're not even allowed to explain polygamy in Mississippi?

 

[SexySteph]

^Why this dude keep talking about his dick tho? I mean, you do you and all but you might want to chill out on all that cock talk.

Isn't it obvious? I have a small cock (the rarest sentence in the English language ). Well -- it's not HUGE, ergo it's small. Case closed.

Also, 'you do you'? Having never heard that, I gave a gander to Urban Dictionary, and it has a single definition, from 2009(!). Get with the times, man -- and if this is becoming a thing again, please don't help it along. :hand:

:?

 

[StrayObject]

I only wanted to see her reaction when she's caught by the librarians.

 

[PunkInDrublic]

^Why this dude keep talking about his dick tho? I mean, you do you and all but you might want to chill out on all that cock talk.

Isn't it obvious? I have a small cock (the rarest sentence in the English language ). Well -- it's not HUGE, ergo it's small. Case closed.

Also, 'you do you'? Having never heard that, I gave a gander to Urban Dictionary, and it has a single definition, from 2009(!). Get with the times, man -- and if this is becoming a thing again, please don't help it along. :hand:

 

[Sansa]

Some state laws are hilarious. I can almost understand the homosexual behavior law, Texas gonna Texas, but the dildo one is funny. Like how do you even decide or come to the conclusion that 6 dildos is the safe amount of dildos that one should own?

The dildo law is in effect so that people cannot legally sell them in Texas thus inhibiting the existence of sex shops in that state. And it's all based on archaic and ridiculous viewpoints that sex should only be for procreation, and the more people have access to toys that will prevent them from having sex, the less babies they make. Because you know, everyone who masturbates is a selfish loser who will never ever want to get laid or maybe someday have a family. :roll:

'Murica, home of the free, right?

 

[SomeRandomDude]

She's pleading 'not guilty' to one count of 'indecent act'... Could it be that under Canadian laws, only the person who actually caught her (the librarian) has a case against her? I mean, the rest never saw any *skin*, regardless of their suspicisions. Of course there might be additional charges down the line; the trial is set in April.

Anyway, I thought her act was pretty decent (I feel like this joke should be made in every one of these cases, so there, I've made it )...

 

[Chamaeleon]

Even if a girl just touches her pussy then the chair or table.. i dont wanna touch your pussy juices dammit. I dont care if it's a library, bus, train, or public park.

Sure, but realistically, for all of the reasons mentioned in this thread, I can't see it being particularly common for women to rub their bare pussies on random surfaces.

Like Carmita, I've only seen tease shows in libraries. I know some cam models go much further than that, but I really doubt that there's a widespread pussy-stain epidemic.

I meant a girl touching her pussy or ass and then her touching something else like the chair or table, or heck even the doors to leave the place. Her juices are now on her hand and she is spreading them around after that. Ive seen a lot more than tease shows in public or just boob flashes. The majority I have ever seen have gone below the belt type things. Either way though I dont wanna be in places where people are doing that. Just keep your pants on in public like you're supposed to. Again it's disrespectful to others who share the space with you. (General yous, not specifically you Alexandra.) There's really no arguing it is gross to be touching yourself in a public area then touching other things that other people are going to be touching next.

This, I have occasionally wondered... Don't women in short skirts have the potential to leave chairs a bit unhygienic also?

 

[LilyMarie]

Even if a girl just touches her pussy then the chair or table.. i dont wanna touch your pussy juices dammit. I dont care if it's a library, bus, train, or public park.

Sure, but realistically, for all of the reasons mentioned in this thread, I can't see it being particularly common for women to rub their bare pussies on random surfaces.

Like Carmita, I've only seen tease shows in libraries. I know some cam models go much further than that, but I really doubt that there's a widespread pussy-stain epidemic.

I meant a girl touching her pussy or ass and then her touching something else like the chair or table, or heck even the doors to leave the place. Her juices are now on her hand and she is spreading them around after that. Ive seen a lot more than tease shows in public or just boob flashes. The majority I have ever seen have gone below the belt type things. Either way though I dont wanna be in places where people are doing that. Just keep your pants on in public like you're supposed to. Again it's disrespectful to others who share the space with you. (General yous, not specifically you Alexandra.) There's really no arguing it is gross to be touching yourself in a public area then touching other things that other people are going to be touching next.

This, I have occasionally wondered... Don't women in short skirts have the potential to leave chairs a bit unhygienic also?

If your skirt is so short that your panties or pussy or ass can touch what you're sitting on when you sit down, that means you're not dressed to leave the house.
:twocents-02cents:

 

[AerynShade]

This, I have occasionally wondered... Don't women in short skirts have the potential to leave chairs a bit unhygienic also?

If your skirt is so short that your panties or pussy or ass can touch what you're sitting on when you sit down, that means you're not dressed to leave the house.
:twocents-02cents:

I am often dressed inappropriately to leave the house when going out with my boyfriend then. :lol:

 

[SexySteph]

Even if a girl just touches her pussy then the chair or table.. i dont wanna touch your pussy juices dammit. I dont care if it's a library, bus, train, or public park.

Sure, but realistically, for all of the reasons mentioned in this thread, I can't see it being particularly common for women to rub their bare pussies on random surfaces.

Like Carmita, I've only seen tease shows in libraries. I know some cam models go much further than that, but I really doubt that there's a widespread pussy-stain epidemic.

I meant a girl touching her pussy or ass and then her touching something else like the chair or table, or heck even the doors to leave the place. Her juices are now on her hand and she is spreading them around after that. Ive seen a lot more than tease shows in public or just boob flashes. The majority I have ever seen have gone below the belt type things. Either way though I dont wanna be in places where people are doing that. Just keep your pants on in public like you're supposed to. Again it's disrespectful to others who share the space with you. (General yous, not specifically you Alexandra.) There's really no arguing it is gross to be touching yourself in a public area then touching other things that other people are going to be touching next.

This, I have occasionally wondered... Don't women in short skirts have the potential to leave chairs a bit unhygienic also?

If your skirt is so short that your panties or pussy or ass can touch what you're sitting on when you sit down, that means you're not dressed to leave the house.
:twocents-02cents:

Most dresses and skirts I have are like this. Standing they're not inappropriate at all but just due to where they sit on my waist they tug up in the back a little when I sit.

 

[Teagan]

Sure, but realistically, for all of the reasons mentioned in this thread, I can't see it being particularly common for women to rub their bare pussies on random surfaces.

Like Carmita, I've only seen tease shows in libraries. I know some cam models go much further than that, but I really doubt that there's a widespread pussy-stain epidemic.

I meant a girl touching her pussy or ass and then her touching something else like the chair or table, or heck even the doors to leave the place. Her juices are now on her hand and she is spreading them around after that. Ive seen a lot more than tease shows in public or just boob flashes. The majority I have ever seen have gone below the belt type things. Either way though I dont wanna be in places where people are doing that. Just keep your pants on in public like you're supposed to. Again it's disrespectful to others who share the space with you. (General yous, not specifically you Alexandra.) There's really no arguing it is gross to be touching yourself in a public area then touching other things that other people are going to be touching next.

This, I have occasionally wondered... Don't women in short skirts have the potential to leave chairs a bit unhygienic also?

If your skirt is so short that your panties or pussy or ass can touch what you're sitting on when you sit down, that means you're not dressed to leave the house.
:twocents-02cents:

Most dresses and skirts I have are like this. Standing they're not inappropriate at all but just due to where they sit on my waist they tug up in the back a little when I sit.

I think it was more a cheeky comment. Not meant to be insulting to anyone. I have quiet a few dresses and skirts that flare out and when sitting down they do not cover the chair beneath me fully. I wear panties though to not have kitty touching the seat in those cases lol. No biggie then.

 

[SomeRandomDude]

Ah. It seems that this here is the bone of contention:

(From the Windsor Star article on the case; bold mine
"According to Section 173 of the Criminal Code of Canada, an indecent act charge applies to 'everyone who willfully does an indecent act in a public place in the presence of one or more persons, or in any place with intent to insult or offend any person.'"

It will be interesting to see what 'in the presence' is judged to mean here. Does 'out of sight, out of mind' apply here or not? Notably the charge says nothing about filming people against their consent. It could be that the law for this just hasn't been made yet... Laws always lag behind societal development, and filming porn in libraries is a fairly new phenomenon.

I was pretty surprised to find that if someone accuses her in person, she could face up to two years(!) in prison. :shock: Otherwise six months is the max sentence. But even then how likely is she to get it? I'd say not very; she didn't flash any people directly, even though her shows were extremely bold otherwise. If the judge is a male and she wears an open top to court, she'll get a slap on the, err, wrist (yeah, that's it). :naughty:

In other news, someone has registered the domain [herrealname].com. Either someone hoping to sell it to her for a good price, or she's reserved it herself for her new career. Smart move in any case. :thumbleft:

EDIT: From the Facbook comments on the article:

"Her parents must be so proud..."

I've always found this to be one of the most heinous phrases in any language. Imo, no one should give a damn about what their parents think about them. And as a parent, you shouldn't take pride in anything your child does, nor should you be embarrassed for any reason for something that *they* do. This is because no one asks to be born, and because we're all our own entities, with free will etc. The extent of one's pride should be in how well they judge themselves to have *raised* the child; if you know you did your best and your child chooses unwisely (to you that is), then oh well. If otoh you know you didn't do your best, then it's on you to some extent. But even then your kid might view the issue differently (such as in Kendra's case, where her parents disapprove of her becoming a millionaire on body image + notoriety, a thing that she herself relishes (rightly, imo)). In short, when you choose to have children, you waive all rights to complaints or shame about them. Pride too, since it is the opposite of shame and they cannot exist without each other. Pride or shame over other people's acts is a sickness, and the world is better off without it.

 

[LilyMarie]

I think it was more a cheeky comment. Not meant to be insulting to anyone. I have quiet a few dresses and skirts that flare out and when sitting down they do not cover the chair beneath me fully. I wear panties though to not have kitty touching the seat in those cases lol. No biggie then.

I was being half-serious, I guess. Definitely not meant to be insulting, but I stick with my opinion that your panties or bare genitals really shouldn't be touching a chair/bench/couch/whatever when you're at someone else's house, or at a public place. That's what the skirt is supposed to be for.
A walk in the park for example, where you know or assume that you're not going to sit down, is different.

 

[ramblin]

your panties or bare genitals really shouldn't be touching a chair/bench/couch/whatever when you're at someone else's house, or at a public place.

I've never been bothered by sitting around in my swim trunks, or in boxer briefs somewhere I'm spending the night, or in pants with no underwear if that's the way the day went. I don't see why panties should be any different. As for completely bare, I think there is (or should be) a general understanding that you at least put a towel down.

 

[Katie_Meow]

your panties or bare genitals really shouldn't be touching a chair/bench/couch/whatever when you're at someone else's house, or at a public place.

I've never been bothered by sitting around in my swim trunks, or in boxer briefs somewhere I'm spending the night, or in pants with no underwear if that's the way the day went. I don't see why panties should be any different. As for completely bare, I think there is (or should be) a general understanding that you at least put a towel down.

Well, there is such a thing as... discharge, that men don't have to deal with. It can sometimes mean you need another layer of protection between yourself and whatever you're sitting on.

 

[Sevrin]

Well, there is such a thing as... discharge, that men don't have to deal with. It can sometimes mean you need another layer of protection between yourself and whatever you're sitting on.

Guys have other issues.

 

[SoTxBob]

havent been here in awhile so catching up.... Saw this "Juju" woman on a youtube the other day... I was stunned to see how old she is and also that she's set up a ...wait for it ...... "camgirl mentoring site" to teach you how to be better camgirls ... :lol:

 

[LilyMarie]

Wow, someone's angry... :lol:
Apparently knowing how to dress in public outside of the camming world means I'm out of touch with my profession
Buddy/girl, there are camming clothes and then there are street clothes, ok? They're not the same.
I'm sorry your mom didn't love you so that you have to stalk my ACF posts and then leave messages on my wall or send me MFC mails, but I won't stop posting on ACF just because you don't like me. I think my ACF score says I should stay.

 

[SomeRandomDude]

Lol Juju is foaming at the mouth on Twitter... Woving to take down all the sexy nastiness! She's got her work cut out for her, hehe. :snooty: :violin:

In other news, the video of lilsecrett that got almost 600,000 views has been taken down. Either by her request or for violating site rules, which prohibit showing criminal activities.
Also, lilsecrett.com now shows a blank page instead of a sales contact box, indicating that she's acquired it. Minimum price was $799; I wonder how high it went in the end?

It's funny. Everyone's getting something out of this case.

a) Even if lil didn't plan for it (I don't think she did), she might yet cash in on her fame big-time
b) The press had a field-day with the clickety-clicks
c) Her star lawyer gets some nice advertizing
d) MFC gets many more hits (if also more troubles)
e) Even Juju got her hate-rocks off (although if lil makes it big with a slap on the wrist, you can rest assured she'll spontaneously combust over it! :lol: )

So... The system works, I guess. The only ones who didn't benefit might be lil's friends and relatives, being haunded by the press for a little while. But the scandal seems to be dying down now, and as anyone who founds one should already know, families get the short end of the stick all the time anyway.

Anyway, Juju wovs for more public outings, so we shan't want for entertainment (nor outrage, if that's your brand of syringe). I wonder about one particularly prominent model from the Southern US. There's many screens and vids of her doing public shows at the local Uni libraries. If it's so easy, I wonder why Juju hasn't outed her yet? Friends in high places? It helps to have the dean as your top tipper!